DWQA Questions › Tag: healing request
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
If we make an addition to the following request in the Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Invite all humans currently in the light, all extraterrestrials currently in the light, all the fallen angelics who are in rehabilitation, all the angels, archangels, and Creator, as well as all animals, elementals, Gaia, the sun and solar system, and all portions of their souls, who want the healing of humanity and its perpetrators, to add their intentions to ours…etc.” will that be effective in recruiting the maximum possible resources connected to these beings to aid our healing and rescue of the divine human project?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
401 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In addition to the notable shrinking population of mosquitoes outside my house, there was a sudden and mysterious disappearance of all the large red ants who wreaked havoc in my garden and devastated my plants. Was it a response to my prayers requests to the Divine to remove all scourges from Planet Earth which I added to all my sessions?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
359 views0 answers0 votes
Is it of benefit for the Lightworker Healing Protocol to include as clients, all beneficial microorganisms (e.g. Healthy gut bacteria), before the listing: insects, animals, and plants…?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
333 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Can we expand all our previous sessions on individuals or groups by including new members to them in a similar fashion as we do with each Lightworker Healing Protocol version by doing a session on all our previous clients?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
309 views0 answers0 votes
I have as a request in the current Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Carry out these sessions in perpetuity throughout the current life as well as all past, present and future parallel lifetimes, their future extensions, and all future incarnations, commencing with their return to the womb.” Is the phrase, “all future incarnations,” actually redundant? I was thinking it might be needed in case a new incarnation was started by another projection of the soul.
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
293 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner wonders: Our current Lightworker Healing Protocol reads, “Source Creator, invite the higher self of my clients to assist Creator in doing a Quantum Healing to bring in new instructions for the cells of the body from a future time of youthful health and wellbeing, apply it to all parallel past, current, and future lives and their future extensions, keeping it going with momentum, as a new reservoir of healing instructions that is available on an ongoing basis and redelivered in any new window of opportunity.” Should a clear distinction be made between the terms current and present? As in “the current life” (i.e. the one we are experiencing here and now) and “parallel present lives (more than one ongoing incarnation of our soul extension at the present time perhaps?)?” If so, should the wording above be changed to “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
284 views0 answers0 votes
Perhaps for the benefit of the understanding of our practitioners, would it be best to add, after the revision stated above, the phrase, “undertaken by portions of the soul?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
297 views0 answers0 votes
Similarly, in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, would it be advantageous to use the wording “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions” to all the steps for the Quantum Healing, sending love to unborn selves, requesting a Soul Reawakening, and sending Divine Ultimate Protection?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
286 views0 answers0 votes
In the Lightworker Healing Protocol, we currently ask for healing of all light beings with the following request: “Carry out retroactive healing sessions on their behalf with the Protocol prior to their departure and transition to the light, and include them in all future healing sessions described by this Protocol.” Will it be advantageous to expand the request for retroactive healing of all current light beings to say: “Carry out retroactive healing sessions on their behalf with the Protocol throughout all parallel past and future lives and their future extensions, commencing with return to the womb and continuing until their successful transition to the light, and include them in all future healing sessions described by this Protocol?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
336 views0 answers0 votes
Do we need to specify the Nephilim as clients in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, or are they automatically included as we already specified both humans and extraterrestrials be included?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
310 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks about the Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Is it of value when asking for “release of all vows, oaths, contracts, agreements, allegiances, and promises made between my clients and any spirit attachment, dark spirit, alien, extragalactic, or interdimensional intruders and other attacking entities, alternate realities, and dimensions they have encountered” to also include THEMSELVES in the list of potential attackers?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
330 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner wonders about asking in the Lightworker Healing Protocol for removal of all sources of negativity from food and beverages…but why not water, air, medications, toiletries such as makeup, toothpaste and mouthwash, alcohol, marijuana, and other recreational drugs? Would it be best, instead of “food and beverages” for all the above, to say “removal of all sources of negativity from anything inhaled, ingested, or absorbed by the body?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
357 views0 answers0 votes
Our client writes: “I am a nurse who works with children and dogs (therapy dogs) to help build a child’s self-confidence, self-worth, after struggles with bullying, abuse…would it be okay to use the Lightworker Healing Protocol with children even if the parents don’t know?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
359 views0 answers0 votes
Given the dangers of ultrasound, do we need to specifically mention all human embryos and fetuses in the LHP client list or are these developing human bodies already covered as part of humanity? To what extent does the embryo and/or fetus need protection, independently of and before the human soul becomes more fully connected to its developing future body?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
390 views0 answers0 votes
My client with dementia has still not transitioned. Will another session of subconscious channeling help her to see the wisdom in this? What else can be done?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
326 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…2122232425…30Next »
Ask Question