DWQA Questions › Tag: group-think
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
How are the viruses causing dementia transmitted? Are dementia patients safe to be around?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
125 views0 answers0 votes
Are there any currently available antiviral drugs that could reverse virus-caused dementia, like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
How effective will regular application of the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset be in preventing dementia?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
110 views0 answers0 votes
Will preventing and/or removing bacterial transfer to the brain be an effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, and if not, is it actually caused by a virus?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
108 views0 answers0 votes
The Russian-speaking cybercriminal gang known as AlphV and Blackcat, claimed responsibility for the cyberattack against Change Healthcare and said on its darkweb site that it exfiltrated 6 TB of data. Observers saw a subsequent 22 million dollar Bitcoin payment to a blockchain ledger associated with that group of hackers, so it appears a ransom was paid. Were they the true culprits? Were the extraterrestrials even involved?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
132 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “My question concerns how fast humans might advance given the opportunities to do so. It seems to me that even if humanity is thrown into a more difficult situation before being given a reprieve from our perpetrators, we still might be able to move forward spiritually in a rapid manner. If given the chance would technologies like nuclear fusion and the ability to see interdimensional life through advanced telescopes that would be super cold… Allow us to have the energy and the new knowledge to understand that the spiritual and/or divine is a scientific reality? Which in turn could change humanity’s focus quite rapidly toward spiritual development, allowing for an ascension event to become a more realistic possibility?”
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
It was reported in the news that “the U.S. government has arbitrarily decided it will no longer conduct safety research on wireless radiation, abruptly halting the National Toxicology Project… Despite that 10-year, $30M project finding increases in cancer, heart damage and DNA damage from exposure to cell phone RF radiation at common levels.” You have cautioned us for years that these emissions cause cancer. Is this cancellation sinister in its origins to cover up the truth?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
141 views0 answers0 votes
We saw an announcement saying: “Change Healthcare, an affiliate of Optum and UnitedHealthcare, experienced a cyberattack last week. This is significant because Change operates the nation’s largest medical electronic data interchange (or EDI), a network that allows for the transmission of claims data back and forth between insurance companies and hospitals, pharmacies, doctors’ offices and other healthcare providers seeking payment for their services. Among the types of transactions processed daily through Change are patient eligibility verification, clinical pre-authorizations, claims submissions, and payments to providers for services rendered. Change is a vital link between providers and insurers, processing more than 15 billion healthcare transactions annually. In 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice noted that over 50% of all U.S. medical claims pass through or touch Change’s EDI clearinghouse, and we suspect that number has only increased since then.” Is this just a human malicious attack, or is it related to the plan of the interlopers to weaken us by disrupting our technology?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
96 views0 answers0 votes
The cofounder of Wikipedia has revealed a bombshell concerning long-running suspicions of US intelligence interference and manipulation of the world’s most well-known collaborative online encyclopedia. The site’s cocreator, Larry Sanger, spoke to journalist Glenn Greenwald on his “System Update” podcast, and outlined the known “information warfare” efforts of US intelligence, which have to some extent made Wikipedia a tool of “control” by the left-liberal Washington deep state. Sanger explained that the intelligence agencies “pay off the most influential people to push their agendas, which they’re already mostly in line with, or they just develop their own talent within the community, learn the Wikipedia game, and then push what they want to say with their own people.” “A great part of intelligence and information warfare is conducted online,” he added, and then specified: “on websites like Wikipedia.” For that reason along with others explored in the interview, Sanger calls it “the most biased encyclopedia” in history. He described that US intelligence manipulation of the immensely large platform and repository of information had been going on for more than a decade (Wikipedia was founded and appeared online in 2001).
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
181 views0 answers0 votes
Is it true that cancer, functionally speaking, is a metabolic disorder and not a genetic one in terms of its cause?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
598 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…345
Ask Question