DWQA Questions › Tag: global pandemicFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesDr. Al Sears cited what he calls “a landmark study conducted by scientists at the Cleveland Clinic.” The researchers discovered that recipients of more than one dose of a Covid vaccine are more likely to contract the virus. According to the study, the more vaccine doses received, the greater the risk: 1.5 times higher for those with two doses; 1.95 times higher for those with three doses; and 2.5 times higher for those with more than three doses. Despite these findings, the CDC continues to recommend Covid vaccines for virtually everyone age 6 months and older. The Cleveland researchers concluded that while the vaccines offer some short-term protection, they also likely increase the risk of future infection. The problem appears to be that taking multiple vaccine doses leads to “antibody-dependent enhancement.” In other words, the immune system’s response becomes skewed towards older virus strains, making it less effective against newer strains. In past channelings, you have defended the Covid-19 vax as necessary to prevent deaths overall during the pandemic, despite the risk of side effects. How would you answer these new criticisms of those advising against further vaccination? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Coronavirus COVID-1966 views0 answers0 votesIn Dr. Anthony Fauci’s autobiography, he describes a grilling by Senator Rand Paul as the latter’s misunderstanding that gain of function research on viruses is not the same as “gain of function research of concern,” because only the latter includes potentially dangerous manipulations to increase pathogenicity and transmissibility of infectious viruses. Fauci explained what the U.S. funded in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was work on bat viruses that were non-infectious in humans, to simply study their properties. Secondly, he points out that the “molecular makeup of the bat viruses studied at the WIV under the NIAID/EHA grant was genetically so different from SARS-CoV-2 that they could not possibly be the source of SARS-CoV-2.” Is that an accurate description by Fauci and not a minimization or deceptive misstatement of fact?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control42 views0 answers0 votesWas the condemnation and inflammatory attack on Fauci by Senator Rand Paul orchestrated through mind control manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to provide a false narrative, and was that picked up and reported many times by Fox News commentators without careful review and analysis because of mind control manipulation to create a cover story for appearance of what is actually an extraterrestrial viral creation?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control49 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 1. “Schools should be fully reopened because COVID was not a serious threat to children and they did not transmit the virus efficiently even if they got infected.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control51 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 2. “COVID would run its course no matter what actions were taken.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control45 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 3. “Only the symptomatic should be tested.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control36 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 4. “It was the vulnerable in nursing homes and other high-risk places who needed protection.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control42 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 5. “Masks were overrated and that most people should be allowed to go about their lives normally because public health restrictions were upending the economy and exacting an exorbitant social cost.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control44 views0 answers0 votesOverall, were these views of Dr. Atlas or Dr. Fauci on public health measures promoted by extraterrestrial mind control?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control49 views0 answers0 votesFauci also criticized the similar Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter of October 2020 signed by many epidemiologists and public health professionals, only saying that some of the signatures were later found to be fraudulent. Was that true?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control45 views0 answers0 votesWas the Great Barrington Declaration ginned up by mind control manipulation, perhaps to sow discord in the scientific community? Was Fauci’s dismissal of its perspectives a mind control manipulation?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control44 views0 answers0 votesHuman papillomavirus vaccination has been linked to occurrence of an autoimmune brain disorder, anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis, and that form of encephalitis has been observed to occur shortly after Covid-19 vaccination as well. Are these outbreaks of unusual autoimmune symptoms actually being produced by a contaminating virus inserted into vaccines surreptitiously?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers96 views0 answers0 votesA recent study released as a preprint by S. Zhang and W. El-Deiry showed that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein inhibits tumor suppressor gene p53. The media is promoting the speculation this may explain a rise in cancer starting a year after the beginning of the pandemic, when vaccines based on mRNA spike protein production in the body became available. Is this a significant downside of the vaccines?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Coronavirus COVID-19112 views0 answers0 votesA preprint by C. Alegria, et al. reports an investigation that tracked neoplasm deaths among 15 to 44-year-olds by evaluating crude data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). They found while the rate of neoplasm deaths declined from 2010 to 2019, there was a statistically significant uptick in 2021 and 2022, the years following introduction of the Covid-19 vaccine. Also, there was a highly significant increase in all-cause mortality, which never exceeded minus 5% to plus 5% from 2010 to 2019, but reached 20% in 2020, 34% in 2021, and 18% in 2022, all “abnormally high.” Were the increased neoplasm-associated deaths and also the excess all-cause mortality consequences, at least in part, due to contaminating viruses in the vaccines?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Coronavirus COVID-19103 views0 answers0 votesDr. Osborne has stated, “In the past four years, there has been a 200% surge in diagnostic rates for early-onset Alzheimer’s among women aged 30 to 64.” Is that statement an accurate reflection of an increased incidence of illness, and if so, what is the cause?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers131 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola