DWQA Questions › Tag: gasoline
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Writers have reported the Pogue Carburetor went into production and was sold openly. However, one of the crucial factors of these systems is the use of “white” gasoline, which contained no additives. It was at this time oil companies started adding lead to the fuel. Lead is an anti-catalyst that rendered Pogue’s carburetor as inefficient as a regular carb. His invention caused such shock waves through the stock market, that the US and Canadian governments both stepped in and applied pressure to stifle him. Was lead added [at that very moment] to gasoline to [stop Pogue and] prevent anyone else from building such a device, as lead leaves heavy deposits and clogs these types of units, rendering them ineffective due to the inability to transfer heat to the fuel? This is, in fact, all true. There was a rapid move made to render this advance moot by creating the very doctoring of gasoline described here. In fact, it was a dual win for the dark because it not only downgraded the performance of the more advanced carburetor that could make fuel use dramatically more efficient, the addition of lead contributes to dangerous pollution in the environment and this serves the Extraterrestrial Alliance because anything done to degrade humanity, even in small ways over long periods of time, they wish to promote, so this was doubly dark in the intention and has taken a toll accordingly. Pogue appears to have done the “practical thing” by selling out when compared to Meyer’s fate. What are the karmic implications of the two men’s different choices made in regards to the suppression of their technologies? What is the Divine “perspective” of Meyer’s martyrdom versus Pogue’s capitulation? What are the long-term implications for both?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
327 views0 answers0 votes
Henry Ford’s first engines used alcohol and it was reported that he was adamantly against using gasoline because of its volatility and explosion danger. It is claimed that he was literally FORCED by the bankers, J.P. Morgan and Rockefeller, to burn gasoline or face bankruptcy and ruin (or even “worse”). Is this true?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
342 views0 answers0 votes
Forty percent of a barrel of crude oil becomes gasoline upon distillation. David Rockefeller in his autobiography “bragged” how his grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, ingeniously turned this “waste product” that nobody knew how to dispose of, into a “profit center.” There have been reports of high mileage carburetors (such as the Pogue carburetor used in Sherman tanks during WWII) that got as much as 200 miles per gallon. When the war was over, these were all rounded up and destroyed. Is the reason why because of the need to burn off HUGE quantities of unwanted gasoline, and high mileage vehicles would work against that agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
330 views0 answers0 votes
If oil and gasoline are as plentiful, as suggested above, then the whole notion of an “energy crisis” is beyond laughable. Is this true? (Nobody talks about running out of oil today). What was the motive for telling such a lie?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
362 views0 answers0 votes
Why is the internal combustion engine still the primary power plant 100 years later? Is it the need to burn the unwanted gasoline that doesn’t have a good alternative?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
361 views0 answers0 votes
Is the use of food, in particular, corn, as a source of fuel a manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to foster misuse of farmland, raise costs, and reduce energy efficiency?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
385 views0 answers0 votes