DWQA Questions › Tag: free will paradigmFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThe tendency for wealth and the ownership of resources to concentrate in fewer and fewer hands under laissez-faire capitalism presents perhaps the same concern that communism does—slavery of the worker and lower classes of society by a tiny elite class of individuals. Instead of the government, the company is the fully controlling entity. The excesses of company housing and the infamous company store are legion, and one of the realities that contributed to the popularity of Marxism. What is Creator’s perspective on the dangers of concentrated wealth?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society409 views0 answers0 votesSome have asserted that a fascist government, is one that has been co-opted by corporate elites, such that whole governments become de facto extensions of corporate empires, and serve the interest of the corporations over those of the people. Many fear that this is the precise fate that awaits the United States (and perhaps the world). What is Creator’s perspective on this?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society387 views0 answers0 votesSince extreme concentration of wealth and political power seems to be a common theme with the rise of monopolies and corporate fascism, as well as socialism and communism as extreme responses that only seem to end up with precisely the same reality of the few exercising control of the many, what is Creator’s advice on the best way to cope and maybe regulate this propensity? Understanding that healing and mass enlightenment are the ultimate answers, what would Creator suggest as a more interim divinely aligned strategy?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society379 views0 answers0 votesA company, by definition, has a number of contributors, and while arguably the creator and innovator of a company deserves the lion’s share of the rewards, a question some have pondered is whether there should be some kind of limit or sunset on how long this should be allowed to go on? So long as descendants of the founders can manage the corporate empire, the empire could exist indefinitely, along with the stark and extreme apportionment of the profits to the owners and owners’ descendants. What is Creator’s perspective on this observation?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society381 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the true solutions to creating future collective prosperity, rather than anything involving direct societal planning, organization, and especially coercion of desired behaviors?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society417 views0 answers0 votesTocqueville said: “What good does it do me, after all, if an ever-watchful authority keeps an eye out to ensure that my pleasures will be tranquil and races ahead of me to ward off all danger, sparing me the need even to think about such things, if that authority, even as it removes the smallest thorns from my path, is also absolute master of my liberty and my life; if it monopolizes vitality and existence to such a degree that when it languishes, everything around it must also languish; when it sleeps, everything must also sleep; and when it dies, everything must also perish?” This sounds a bit like life in the rest of the universe outside of the Milky Way Galaxy. Was Tocqueville discerning the motive for the divine free will experiment?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions323 views0 answers0 votesTocqueville said: “I cannot help fearing that men may reach a point where they look on every new theory as a danger, every innovation as a toilsome trouble, every social advance as a first step toward revolution, and that they may absolutely refuse to move at all.” Tocqueville seems to be seeing the dangers of complacency almost 200 years ago. What is the divine perspective on this statement?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions309 views0 answers0 votesTocqueville said: “It’s not an endlessly expanding list of rights—the right to education, the right to health care, the right to food and housing. That’s not freedom, that’s dependency. Those aren’t rights, those are the rations of slavery—hay and a barn for human cattle.” This comment on the expanding list of rights sounds like a lot of today’s political talking points. Can Creator comment?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions325 views0 answers0 votesTocqueville said: “Men will not accept truth at the hands of their enemies, and truth is seldom offered to them by their friends.” This statement seems to be both an observation on reality, as well as advice on spreading truth. What is Creator’s perspective on this statement?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions309 views0 answers0 votesTocqueville said: “A man’s admiration for absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him.” What is the divine perspective of that statement?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions315 views0 answers0 votesTocqueville said: “He who does anything because it is the custom, makes no choice. He gains no practice either in discerning or in desiring what is best. The mental and moral, like the muscular powers, are improved only by being used. The faculties are called into no exercise by doing a thing merely because others do it, no more than by believing a thing only because others believe it.” This seems to be Tocqueville advocating the intentional and focused pursuit of personal wisdom. What is the divine perspective on this statement?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions301 views0 answers0 votesDemocracy is only as noble as the voters. Can Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can heal and elevate the majority to aspire to and vote for solutions that more succinctly benefit “all” rather than simply the majority?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions345 views0 answers0 votesThere is a popular saying known to be at least 360 years old “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” What is Creator’s perspective on that saying?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Higher Self385 views0 answers0 votesIt’s amazing how many truly dysfunctional and unsuccessful people have blind trust or faith in their capacity to trust and distrust accurately. And no amount of evidence to the contrary seems to shake the strength of their conviction in their ability to trust and distrust. Can Creator comment on this widely shared blind spot?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Higher Self349 views0 answers0 votesMany people regard trust and distrust as something that happens to them, rather than something they themselves consciously participate in. And therefore, they must obey these feelings as if they had no say or participation in the matter. What is Creator’s perspective on this?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Higher Self351 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola