DWQA Questions › Tag: free will paradigm
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
She asks: “Are there dark depraved spirits residing in my home? If so, can the spirit attached to my body and the spirit(s) living in my home be removed to keep me safe from further harm?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
167 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Finally, would God like me to do anything to assist with the removal of the long-standing evil that pervades my life?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
210 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner writes: “I think one of the things that helps make a prayer effective is that there’s a distinction between the idea of faith versus assumption of result. If you put air in a tire the assumption-of-result is it will fill up with air. If it doesn’t fill up with air then the natural thing would be to check for leaks then fill it up again, and the assumption is that if you do that enough it will definitely work at some point. When I looked back in the sky, I was not wondering about the idea of strength of faith but just checking as a matter of practicality if I need to repeat the prayer. I wonder if, because time is nonlinear, the success of the original prayer is determined, at least in part, by the mindset when the person looks at the result. If the mindset is about the idea of testing to see if the prayer caused the divine to act, then it is less effective since that is tied to the idea of the requester trying to train the divine which is backwards. On the other hand, if the mindset is checking to see if the requester needs to fill in gaps or add more of their own contribution, then the original prayer is more effective. In that case, the requester is checking their own performance and not on the divine’s performance. This gives the green light to go back in time and make the prayer work instantly, or perhaps shift timelines, or however it works.” Is this an accurate analysis? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
188 views0 answers0 votes
A client asks: “I am writing about my brother. He does not show any change outwardly since the sessions using Deep Subconscious Channeling with Trauma Resolution. That does not rule out inward progress. I call him about twice a week, and also discuss with family members in contact with him. They do not perceive any change. I am wondering about what to do next. Options might be 1) nothing, 2) wait and see, 3) do another round of deep subconscious sessions.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
202 views0 answers0 votes
When people seek medical treatment, which almost always provides just symptomatic relief that is not curative, what percent of the time might that backfire in thwarting the karmic forces giving rise to the illness, to cause a new and different problem experienced as symptom displacement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
187 views0 answers0 votes
If symptom displacement happens, can that lead to a more serious and intractable malady, or will the Law of Karma ensure it is only something of comparable severity?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
179 views0 answers0 votes
A noted scientist exploring the idea that God is discoverable via science asked, “Can Science Take Us to God?” And not merely theoretically, but experimentally as well? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
This same scientist, in an obvious attempt to discuss God, but somehow remain “scientific,” invented the term “G.O.D.” which he used to suggest a Guiding, Organizing, Designing process. His thinking was clearly that characterizing God in this way would make Creator more “palatable” to the overwhelmingly atheist scientific community. What does Creator think of this descriptive construct? Helpful or harmful? What does Creator think of being labeled “a process?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
211 views0 answers0 votes
This same scientist was contacted by Chris Robinson, a man who claimed to get prophetic dreams after a near-death experience ten years earlier. Over the years, evidence obtained through his dreams had helped put many criminals behind bars. Murderers who thought they had escaped were caught. Given this means of uncovering evidence, there truly cannot be such a thing as a “perfect crime.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
207 views0 answers0 votes
The scientist mentioned in the previous questions put together a scientific experiment to test Chris Robinson’s prophetic dreaming ability, which he called “The Ten Days in Arizona Experiment.” Before falling asleep, Chris Robinson would ask the universe, in his head, to be shown in his dreams, where he would be taken the next day. In the morning he would write down the details of his dream. Meanwhile, the scientist preselected ten unusual local locations and placed them in envelopes that were to be shuffled before one was selected as the day’s destination. To make a long story short, Chris Robinson was shockingly correct for all ten locations, including one that was substituted unintentionally because of unanticipated obstacles. What can Creator tell us about Chris Robinson’s ability?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
208 views0 answers0 votes
The above experiment proposes a number of intriguing, and some might regard disquieting questions. We are told the future is not preordained. Yet this experiment seems to propose otherwise. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
187 views0 answers0 votes
Was Chris Robinson’s ability a result of time travel on the part of his deep subconscious and other participants such as his higher self and even Creator, and simply relaying to him in the dream state what was discovered?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
181 views0 answers0 votes
Assuming there are always multiple timelines, was it just coincidence that all ten timelines were successfully dreamed of? What if the experiment was run for 100 days, or 1000? Would he still be 100% accurate? Because the dream was always about the next day, and not the next week or next month, or next year, was the timeline more certain, more “crystalized?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
188 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Milton Erickson had a patient who became inexplicably hostile toward her best friend and sought his assistance in trying to discover why. During the combined psychoanalytic and hypnotic investigation, she also revealed hostility toward her father. It turned out that her father and best friend were having an affair, and were both shocked that their efforts at keeping it secret met such profound failure. Did this patient either witness something directly that she repressed away from her conscious awareness, or was she in fact unconsciously, intuitively, aware of both her best friend’s and father’s betrayal of her mother, and her anger and hostility were manifestations of that subconscious intuitive awareness? What does this tell us about trying to get away with something as hurtful as adultery, or any clandestine potentially hurtful behavior?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
200 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Milton Erickson conducted a number of experiments in his career where he was able to use hypnosis to project the subject into a patient-created fantasized future with a positive therapeutic outcome. Usually, the future would be a common realistically achievable goal, such as having a good time at a friend’s wedding or getting a promotion. It’s amazing how often the future would manifest almost precisely as the patient would visualize it—in great detail. Was Erickson simply helping the patient to choose a valid timeline they were unable to choose on their own without his assistance? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
243 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…1920212223…64Next »