DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial mind controlFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThe New York Times on May 23, 2021 had a front-page story about the world facing its first long slide in population because fertility rates are plunging. To what extent is this due to environmental insults from electromagnetic frequencies and exposure to chemicals?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda354 views0 answers0 votesA series of motion pictures, A Civil Action, Erin Brockovich, and Dark Waters all trace real-life events where dedicated whistleblowers and lawyers exposed major chemical companies that contaminated area groundwater with toxic waste chemicals, and then covered up growing health problems of employees and neighboring citizens. That is always depicted as corporate greed and selfishness, and is blamed on capitalism by the media. Is there a deeper and darker reason that companies repeat the same folly generating so-called “forever chemicals” that make the environment a perpetual threat?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda338 views0 answers0 votesA recent paper in the International Journal of Oncology (51:405-413, 12017) traces conflicts of interest in the governing bodies of the World Health Organization, which have been slow to act in response to growing evidence of dangers from radiofrequency radiation. Is this an orchestration by the interlopers?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda301 views0 answers0 votesThe CDC recently posted a warning about the dangers of children using cell phones, because their skulls are a thin barrier and the risk of brain cancer from electromagnetic frequencies is enhanced. This begs the question about safety in adults, but even this warning was removed two weeks later, reportedly because of political pressure. Was this orchestrated by the interlopers?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda340 views0 answers0 votesYears ago, a person we know dated a woman he was highly attracted to. A very profoundly psychic friend at the time warned him that her higher self was evil. This evaluation was questionable then, and questionable now. What was he in fact sensing? Was he picking up on a dark spirit attachment, perhaps an especially powerful one, who was co-opting the role of higher self, and he understandably mistook that being for her actual higher self?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Higher Self371 views0 answers0 votesWas my client’s UFO sighting an extraterrestrial craft or perhaps a Secret Space Program vessel, and was it, in fact, monitoring the Black Lives Matter protest in Seattle that was breaking out at that time?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mercenary Army Program (SSP)356 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “I couldn’t really give my wife a good answer, since both speak about love, compassion, and the heavenly realms, yet both appear to be receiving unasked for inspiration telepathically. What is the Divine perspective on all this? What are reliable criteria to judge genuine Divine inspiration from clever manipulation done by imposters to bring us down?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls324 views0 answers0 votesHuman beings are social creatures. Being accepted by the people you respect is important for nearly everybody. Solitary confinement is widely regarded as one of the worst forms of punishment there is. Can Creator comment on this human need for acceptance, and how that works as a powerful, if not overwhelming, need to be part of a consensus?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society389 views0 answers0 votesDo the interlopers consider this need for peer acceptance a weakness?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society467 views0 answers0 votesPeople don’t have a need to simply be part of a consensus, but to be part of the “right” or “correct” consensus. A friend of a GetWisdom founder confessed recently that the recent election of a particularly controversial politician was one of the most stressful things that ever happened to him. This seems an extraordinary thing for a man in his mid-fifties to confess. Clearly, he wants to be a member of the “right” consensus, but when politics is split almost evenly down the middle, determining which consensus is the “correct” one, is no longer obvious. Is this an accurate way to try and understand his dilemma and angst?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society374 views0 answers0 votesHow much does past life trauma stemming from being a member of the wrong consensus, play into people’s current perceived need to be in the “right” one today? The right one being the “safest” one, perhaps?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society379 views0 answers0 votesOne of the most maddening things for independent thinkers to put up with is the widespread tendency for people to first vet the source of recommended information before deciding whether they will even look at the new information or not. This can get downright comical when people will refuse to click on a link to a “questionable” website, that is in fact a link to a story on another site they actually approve of, or appears to support something they believe. Can Creator share why this seems like “enlightened” behavior to these people?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society351 views0 answers0 votesAirplane pilots need to know which way the wind is blowing before attempting a takeoff. To do this, they will lick their finger and stick it into the air. This same kind of “check,” to see which way the “right consensus” is thinking, is observed almost everywhere. Another analogy would be to think of people walking around with a mini satellite dish on their head, that is connected 24-7 to their consensus database, like social media or a particular news outlet, so they’re never confused about what is “safe” information and what is “dangerous” information? What is Creator’s perspective of these analogies?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society385 views0 answers0 votesIt has been observed that many people genuinely fear information that has been deemed by their consensus to be dangerous, to the extent that they risk exile and banishment (or worse) if they even reveal that they know something they shouldn’t. Not unlike discovering that the car you’re driving is a stolen one, or that you are a carrier of a deadly virus. But the dilemma is, once you are exposed to information, it is very difficult to unsee it, and so people go to great lengths to avoid being exposed if they can help it. This creates some remarkable “gymnastics” at times. Can Creator comment?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society366 views0 answers0 votesPlacing one’s full allegiance with a consensus, and making consensus approval their top criterion for conducting their lives means that consensus acceptance can be more important than facts or truth—to the extreme extent of people not believing their own eyes, or ignoring fundamental standards of fairness and decency they learned at age five. Can Creator share the karmic hazards of living this way?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Problems in Society363 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola