DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial genetic manipulationsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesSutphen came up with five basic categories of Karma. 1. Balancing Karma, which is mechanical cause and effect, such as not being able to conceive a child because of child neglect in a past life. 2. Physical Karma, which is the misuse of a body in one life, so the appropriate affliction is created in a later life, such as being overweight because of starvation in a previous life. 3. False Fear Karma is from a traumatic past-life incident that generates fear that is no longer valid in the current context of your current life. 4. False Guilt Karma from taking on responsibility or blame for a past-life incident for which you are truly blameless. 5. Developed Ability or Awareness Karma, such as musical talent. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Karma205 views0 answers0 votesSutphen was convinced there was a Universal Law: The Law of Fearful Confrontation, “If you fear doing something, and yet have the courage to do it anyway, you will soon do a mental flip-flop and may even become addicted to doing it.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Karma225 views0 answers0 votesSutphen wrote about hypnotizing a woman with fibromyalgia which caused constant physical pain. He directed her back to the real cause of her pain. She began to describe her hard life as a Christian nun. She resided in a tiny cell and suffered physically. She said, “Christ suffered for us, so we must suffer for him as well.” She then said under hypnosis, “The physical pain began about the time I decided to devote my current hypnosis practice to Christ Consciousness work.” Sutphen explains, “Somehow her unconscious mind ‘connected’ the past-life suffering for Christ to a need to suffer doing similar work today.” Sutphen directed her to release the pain and she was fully recovered upon awakening. Can Creator comment on this?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Karma224 views0 answers0 votesA friend of mine in the 1980s told me she had learned that Sutphen was kidnapped by federal authorities and flown to an east coast facility for interrogation. They asked him what he thought he was doing, and he said, “Teaching people how to think.” They told him to stop if he knew what was good for him. “We think for them,” he was reputedly told. In his last book, Sutphen said this only, “My heroes were all willing to speak out and act in response to what they believed. They have certainly influenced the way I communicate. They got me into trouble with the establishment on many occasions.” Was he hinting about what my friend shared with me? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Karma197 views0 answers0 votesSutphen’s last book, his memoir of 80 years, was in fact a summation of every important lesson that he learned in his highly adventurous and creative life. He helped millions of people and certainly earned more good karma than bad. That said, the one thing notably missing from his impressive collection of “lessons learned,” was the concept of “partnership with the divine and Creator.” There were hints here and there of prayer practice, but it appeared more hit and miss, and certainly did not rise to any kind of prominence in his many decades as a noted spiritual teacher and role model. How could he, and so many other advanced souls like him, have not been able to embrace this most important insight?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Karma185 views0 answers0 votesBoth Sutphen and his good friend, Richard Bach, author of the 1970s surprise bestseller, Jonathan Livingston Seagull, had their life savings and even copyrights on all their intellectual property stolen from them. The two thefts were not otherwise related. Both were left absolutely destitute. Bach’s manager stole his, and in 2011 some hacker drained Sutphen’s bank accounts, transferred his copyrights, and wiped out all the master copies of his life’s work. It took three years of lawsuits just to get his copyrights back, but everything else was gone. Can Creator share if Empowered Prayer and/or the Lightworker Healing Protocol could have prevented these evil attacks and tragedy that neither man fully recovered from?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Karma198 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “I was impulsed to reach out to you and ask you what you feel about providing some type of direction for those that are starting to ramp up their dreaming without proper direction. People can “steer” their presence in the dreamscape, and this is never talked about at GetWisdom. Not really. Not the type of detail that could be not only instructional but incredibly beneficial. It occurred to me that if we’re going to go down that rabbit hole of asking the subconscious to work with dreams, the dreamer, in my opinion, should have some type of direction as to how to steer and navigate the dreams that are starting to manifest. Yes, that said, Creator knows best, and perhaps I’m reaching too far?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness163 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “My wish is that, at some point, people will be able to do their own Deep Subconscious Channeling with Holographic Memory Resolution (DSC-HMR), with intent, while dreaming. We have seen that this is doable, right?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Channeling202 views0 answers0 votesIs the current plan to take over human society by putting people under the complete domination and control of the alien Greys to be done through mind control manipulation to keep us complacent, control of us by force, or a gradual replacement of all human pregnancies with an extraterrestrial hybrid being that will be raised by the human parents as their own and humans being phased out?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control219 views0 answers0 votesIs it possible to do healing work via subconscious channeling on Anunnaki, Reptilian, or Arcturian extraterrestrials without their conscious awareness, or is that capability unique for humans because of the deep subconscious disconnect imposed by Anunnaki tinkering with the human genome long ago?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Channeling214 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Would it be wrong to ask Creator that, in pregnancies where the fetus has been stolen by extraterrestrials and replaced by a soul-less hybrid or clone, that those interloping interjections into the woman’s body without her consent be removed or ended in some way so that the pregnancy will not continue to term? My rationale is that since these implants pretending to be human fetuses do not have souls, would this not be much different from removing another kind of alien implant from a human’s body?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Abductions234 views0 answers0 votesWith so many human pregnancies consisting of extraterrestrial hybrid implants, are these being removed as a consequence of the Lightworker Healing Protocol request for removal of alien implants? If not, would this be appropriate to ask for explicitly in the Protocol?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Abductions184 views0 answers0 votesIs the strategy of reducing human fertility also coupled with the plan to implant human/alien Grey hybrids, to be raised within human families as an infiltration into our society so they can attack from within?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Genetic Manipulations199 views0 answers0 votesWhen reading material written by skeptics denying the existence of an afterlife, spirits, etc., their biggest agenda seems to be, “Do whatever it takes to avoid having to settle on a paranormal explanation for ANYTHING.” Why do these people have such a deep-seated aversion to the very notion of the paranormal? It’s almost as if the paranormal traumatizes them. Is that a valid insight? Could these people actually benefit from Deep Subconscious Trauma Resolution?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness246 views0 answers0 votesIncluded in a skeptical article in the collection, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, was this VERY interesting reference, “Another recent study compared Theravada Buddhist Monks with lay novices … The authors found far more (brain) activity in the practiced monks than the novices during meditation, noting that the monks were able to dramatically self-regulate the activity of their frontoparietal and left insular areas.” This one statement dramatically undercuts the assertion that the brain controls ALL mental activity and not the other way around. Yet, it was nonchalantly included in an article whose agenda was to (quote) “Argue that the mind is located in the brain in such a way that there is no mental life after brain death … Our conclusion is overwhelmingly supported by neuroscientific evidence.” Yet they inexplicably include a neuroscientific case study that dramatically undercuts that conclusion. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness262 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola