DWQA Questions › Tag: evil
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Machu Picchu is an Inca citadel located in the Eastern Cordillera of Southern Peru on an eight-thousand-foot mountain ridge. Hiram Bingham roamed South America in the early 1900s and is credited with rediscovering Machu Picchu in 1911. He relates the following: “The modern Peruvians are very fond of speculating as to the method which the Incas employed to make their stones fit so perfectly. One of the favorite stories is that the Incas knew of a plant whose juices rendered the surface of a block so soft that the marvelous fitting was accomplished by rubbing the stones together for a few moments with this magical plant juice!” Can Creator tell us approximately when it was built (hundreds or thousands of years ago), what was its purpose, and who built and used it? Was it simply a make-work project to create a labor-intensive structure in such an inhospitable place?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
277 views0 answers0 votes
Moai, meaning “statue” in Rapa Nui, the language of the native inhabitants, are monolithic humanoid figures on Easter Island, in Eastern Polynesia, 2,182 miles off the West Coast of Chile. Can Creator tell us approximately when these were built, what was their purpose, and who built them? Was Easter Island as isolated then as it is now? Was human slave labor involved? Was it overseen and managed by Extraterrestrials directly, and/or were ET/human hybrids (the Nephilim) involved? Was this simply a make-work project for the amusement of the Extraterrestrial Alliance?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
301 views0 answers0 votes
The Ancient Aliens TV show has detailed many megalithic ruins in promoting the thesis that extraterrestrials have visited Earth and left their mark. This would seem to be a very narrow focus, given the abundant evidence the ETs are still here, and perhaps have never left. If so, doesn’t the fact the extraterrestrials have never come forward to help us show they are not benevolent? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
291 views0 answers0 votes
Buffalo Bill Cody wrote in his autobiography, “While we were in the sand hills, scouting the Niobrara country, the Pawnee Indians brought into camp some very large bones, one of which the surgeon of the expedition pronounced to be the thigh bone of a human being. The Indians said the bones were those of a race of people who long ago had lived in that country. They said these people were three times the size of a man of the present day, that they were so swift and strong that they could run by the side of a buffalo, and, taking the animal in one arm, could tear off a leg and eat it as they ran. These giants, said the Indians, denied the existence of a Great Spirit. When they heard the thunder or saw the lightning, they laughed and declared that they were greater than either.” Is this solid testimonial evidence, that the Anunnaki indeed are atheists, just as Creator has told us many, many times? Could these giants really run with the buffalo as depicted? What more can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
280 views0 answers0 votes
In Southern Illinois, across the Mississippi River from St. Louis, Missouri, are many enigmatic megalithic earthworks in Cahokia, Illinois. According to the website, cahokiamounds.org, Cahokia was once one of the greatest cities in the entire world, once boasting a population larger than the City of London in AD 1250. The site contains the enigmatic “Monks Mound” earthwork which is a mammoth earth platform ten stories high. If this was built with slave labor carrying baskets of material, it would have taken decades or even hundreds of years to complete. Most Americans have never heard of Cahokia, and even many, if not most people, living in Illinois have never heard of it, even though it is literally in their backyard, so to speak. These mounds often contain, or had nearby, burials of giant skeletons. Were these giants the sole inhabitants, or were they the rulers? Were these Nephilim (Anunnaki/human hybrids) who, while ostensibly higher on the importance totem pole, nevertheless were never allowed to fully join Anunnaki society, and so were relegated to live low-tech lives in the same geographical regions as humans, and having to live off the land and by their wits as humans did throughout history?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
286 views0 answers0 votes
The fact humanity has so much history utterly lost to most of us, suggests something sinister is responsible. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol will bring about the healing needed to resolve the “real problem” behind our lost and forgotten history, and perhaps eventually even restore knowledge of that history in great detail?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
394 views0 answers0 votes
Creator said angels do not have a subconscious, and further told us: “They have one integrated way of perceiving things and are able to see a wider array of sources of information; they have a much larger knowledge base. The problem they have is that their beliefs become distorted through time because of conflicts they have with wanting to satisfy desires of the soul that might not be appropriate in the moment.” Is the angel the entirety of its soul or a soul extension, like with human beings? Does an angel experience desires of the soul as something originating outside of their ego, the way a human might, something they have but whose true origin remains a mystery?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
206 views0 answers0 votes
The late Psychiatrist Dr. M. Scott Peck M.D., bestselling author of The Road Less Traveled and who many regard as one of the important pioneers of the “self-help” genre, also wrote an important book titled The People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil from which the questions for this show are derived. Dr. Peck wrote: “… for the past three hundred years there has been a profound separation between religion and science. This divorce – sometimes acrimonious, more often remarkably amicable – has decreed that the problem of evil should remain in the custody of religious thinkers. With few exceptions, scientists have not even sought visitation rights. If for no other reason than the fact that science is supposed to be value-free. The very word ‘evil’ requires an a priori value judgment. Hence it is not even permissible for a strictly value-free science to deal with the subject.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
215 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote: “Science has also steered clear of the problem of evil because of the immensity of the mystery involved. … (Scientists) prefer little mysteries to big ones.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
211 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote: “Evil is in opposition to life. It is that which opposes the life force. It has, in short, to do with killing … Murder is not abstract … Evil is also what kills spirit. There are various essential attributes to life – particularly human life – such as sentience, mobility, growth, autonomy, will. It is possible to kill or attempt to kill one of these attributes without actually destroying the body. Thus we may ‘break’ a horse or even a child. … Evil, then … is that force, residing either inside or outside of human beings, that seeks to kill life or liveliness. And goodness is its opposite.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck had a teenage patient suffering from depression. His older brother had committed suicide with a 22 rifle a year earlier. For Christmas, his parents gave the patient the rifle his brother killed himself with. When Dr. Peck challenged the parents about the inappropriateness of the gift, the parents refused to acknowledge there was any problem with such a gift, claiming they were just simple, working people who can’t be expected to think like the doctor. They were not willing to examine and find fault with themselves at all. As a result, Dr. Peck diagnosed the boy’s depression as being the fault of the parents and threatened to call social services to get the boy to go live for an extended time with his aunt. He concluded the boy’s depression was actually healthy in this situation, and that the boy needed protection from his parents’ evil more than anything. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
200 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “Raised without love, children come to believe themselves unlovable. We may express this as a general law of child development: ‘Whenever there is a major deficit in parental love, the child will, in all likelihood, respond to that deficit by assuming itself to be the cause of the deficit, thereby developing an unrealistically negative self-image.’ … When a child is grossly confronted by significant evil in its parents, it will most likely misinterpret the situation and believe the evil resides in itself.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
201 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… evil people, refusing to acknowledge their own failures, actually desire to project their evil onto others.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
178 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… the sicker the patients – the more dishonest in their behavior and distorted in their thinking – the less able we are to help them with any degree of success. When they are very distorted and dishonest, it seems impossible.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
177 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “The feeling that a healthy person often experiences in a relationship with an evil one is revulsion. … The feeling of revulsion can be extremely useful to a therapist. It can be a diagnostic tool par excellence. … Evil is revolting because it is dangerous. The revulsion countertransference is an instinctive or, if you will, God-given and saving early warning radar system.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
183 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…910111213…39Next »