DWQA Questions › Tag: Emmanuel Mosely
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
He asks: “Emmanuel Mosely was one of three big free agent signings in the off season. One of the others was C.J. Gardner-Johnson who is now out for the season as a result of being targeted. Mosely was available for the Lions because he tore the ACL on his left knee last year and the 49ers let him go as a result. Because of this, he was a genuine bargain for the Lions if Mosely could come back from the injury. He was finally able to take the field yesterday for the first time, and on only the second play after his return, he ended up tearing the ACL in his *RIGHT* (other) knee! This is clearly an attempt on the part of the ETs to demoralize the Lions, but the Lions looked unphased by it and went on to win the game decisively. But for Emmanuel Mosely, this has to be simply devastating. Mosely was a primary client in more than one LHP. Was he playing a karmic role as a kind of sacrificial lamb? What can Creator tell us about what happened, and why, from a karmic perspective, if any?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
121 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “I just read that Moseley’s injury was a NON-CONTACT injury. In other words, he was moving around on the turf and his ACL just went “snap.” The Lions spent MILLIONS just a few months ago to get the very latest turf technology installed for their field. This new turf was supposed to cut down on just these types of injuries. Of course, that rests on an invalid assumption. If the ETs are using targeted energy weapons, then there is NOTHING anyone can do with turf, workouts, techniques, you name it, that can “prevent” these incidents. The NFL has OBSESSED over these injuries, which seem to be occurring more often than EVER, no matter how much money is spent, no matter what training is engaged, and no matter what turf is used. This is beyond insidious, but it’s also careless. The ETs are pressing the boundaries of credulity. Someday, when informed people go back and study all these injuries, they will find that most of these simply don’t “add up.” The assertion they were instead “targeted attack” victims, will not seem “far-fetched” at all.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
129 views0 answers0 votes