DWQA Questions › Tag: egoFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesIn last week’s show on the ego, Creator had this to say about fear: “Many things will compete and constrain the flow of love. The worst by far, in terms of predominance throughout humanity, is harboring fear. It is fear that is a great barrier and limitation in achieving a vibrational state of being in alignment with the divine … In choosing fear, you are essentially saying ‘no’ to divine love because the two are opposites and incompatible.” Most people are of the impression that the opposite of love is hate, but Creator is saying it is FEAR that is opposite and incompatible with love. Hate is certainly a problem, but most people are not hate filled. They are much, much more fear-filled. Is Creator asserting that fear is the biggest problem sentient beings everywhere have?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption211 views0 answers0 votesIs depression a fear-based and fear-driven emotion? Depression is certainly a form of suffering, but is it also a means by which the being attempts to cope with fear and uncertainty? A depressed person is essentially a risk-averse person, and so the feeling of depression can lead an individual to avoid risky behavior that could lead to even greater suffering or even demise. So, ironically, it confers a measure of protection and safety to the afflicted individual, but at the cost of personal happiness. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption226 views0 answers0 votesOne word that Creator has not commented on at length is “acclimation.” A walk in soul with a long history of fearlessness, suddenly found itself in a 22 year old body riddled with anxiety, stress, and depression. Creator has shared that the walk-in does not inherit the deep subconscious of the departing individual, but it does appear to inherit the previous inhabitant’s cellular memory. It took 20 years for the feelings of depression, stress, and anxiety to gradually wither and cease altogether. During the entire time, the walk-in internally labeled these emotions illegitimate and simply ignored them and struggled to live life, often in complete opposition to them. Why did it take 20 years, and what lessons can be learned from this walk-in’s experience?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption240 views0 answers0 votesDid the above walk-in soul choose the walk-in incarnation experience over a natural birth in order to remind itself what fear, anxiety, and stress actually felt like again, as one of the motives? When one becomes fearless (relatively so) it can be very difficult to empathize with the overwhelming majority of humanity who deal with such emotions almost continuously. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption287 views0 answers0 votesDivine healing is certainly one way to clean up the traumatic energy in the akashic records that alarms and triggers the deep subconscious that is always looking for threats and hazards. But isn’t that a kind of an “end-around” to the karmic design of the system? It certainly seems like an intervention into a process and dynamic that should normally be more self-maintaining and automatic. Does suffering “bravely borne” slowly bleed away some of this built-up trauma recorded in the akashic record? Like a drip, drip, drip that eventually empties the pool if persisted long enough?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption191 views0 answers0 votesCreator said this in the last radio show: “The way human beings work is that you have multiple and separate levels of the mind, each with resident beliefs and expectations accordingly, and all are connected to the body in a way that will produce emotions in reaction to what is being perceived.” This seems to imply that the ego is a “separate level of mind, … with (its own) beliefs and expectations.” Is that true? If so, can the ego be channeled in the same way the deep subconscious is channeled? Can trauma resolution be used on the ego itself? Can belief replacement be used? And if not, why not?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption221 views0 answers0 votesCould another name for an interloper be a “run-away ego?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption227 views0 answers0 votes“Don’t feed the ego” is a common refrain. This implies that the ego is also hungry and actively prompts the self to be fed. Can divine intervention be used to make a client’s ego less hungry? Could divine intervention even go so far as to turn hunger into revulsion, such as people experience when they encounter a food they don’t like, or perhaps experienced food poisoning from?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption173 views0 answers0 votesWe know the interlopers, from the fallen angelics to the extraterrestrials, and even some humans, have an almost insatiable bloodlust. The bloodlust seems to be a distorted hunger of the ego. In the same way that the Lightworker Healing Protocol asks that negative energy be transformed from malevolent to benevolent, can bloodlust be similarly transformed upon request? Can the craving be divinely altered? If such cravings were reduced or transformed, would the silent voice of the long-ignored conscience have a chance to re-emerge?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption178 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the best means for tackling the problem of fear and run-away egos?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption217 views0 answers0 votesDo the conscious, cellular, subconscious, and deep subconscious levels of the mind each have an associated ego or a sub-part serving in that capacity?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind233 views0 answers0 votesThe word “ego” is one of those words that is difficult to define, difficult to frame, difficult to put boundaries around, and difficult to get consensus on. Google, for instance, defines ego as “a person’s sense of self-esteem or self-importance,” whereas dictionary.com defines it as “the ‘I’ or self of any person; a person as thinking, feeling, and willing, and distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from objects of its thought.” It is so open-ended that one quickly despairs of ever getting a truly precise definition. With that said, it’s high time to add Creator’s take on the word’s meaning! How would Creator define the word “ego?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption192 views0 answers0 votesIs ego a feature of all sentient consciousness? Sentient meaning consciousness that possesses self-awareness and the capacity for abstract thought. It is assumed that sentience is variable, that there are degrees of sentience. For instance, apes have demonstrated some sentience, but minuscule in comparison to humans. It is also assumed that sentience is not brain-dependent and that angels, of course, have sentience. The question is, where there is sentience, is there also an ego, or the potential for ego? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption184 views0 answers0 votesDoes Creator have an ego?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption290 views0 answers0 votesDictionary.com defined ego as “a person as thinking, feeling, and willing.” “Feeling” is another one of those “slippery” words that can be tough to place boundaries on. The question is, are feelings something the ego or self experiences or creates, or both? Or are the origins of feelings, all feelings, external to the ego? Clearly, the conscious self experiences feelings, but more importantly has the capacity to judge those feelings, as appropriate or inappropriate, based on beliefs that are also often largely resident and originating in the subconscious. Feelings can influence choices of will, but cannot dictate what choices the ego will make. Can Creator help us sort out the reality and flow of feelings or emotion, and what the ego’s role is in experiencing them, judging them, and acting upon them?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption197 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola