DWQA Questions › Tag: egoFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesWikipedia defines the Dunning-Kruger effect as follows: “The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a certain type of a task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge.” This effect seems common, and when encountered, almost completely resistant to challenge or debate. What is Creator’s perspective on the Dunning-Kruger effect? How much can be attributed to subconscious programming, and how much to the simple immaturity of the incarnated human?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votesA person with Dunning-Kruger might say something like, “… of course, I don’t know. I don’t NEED to know. I have COMMON SENSE.” And then expects their opinion to carry equal (or even greater) weight in a given debate. Can Creator share just how a person comes to think this way?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption211 views0 answers0 votesAnother behavior related to Dunning-Kruger would be a tendency to appeal to some kind of superior credential, even and especially if it is completely unrelated to the given debate at hand. Such a credential would be physical age: “Well young man, I am twenty years your senior, I think I know a thing or two.” Or, “You’re talking to a decorated veteran, show some respect!” Or, “I’ve lived a good life, had a lucrative career, raised three upstanding children, and am a grandparent to boot! I think my opinion should matter!” This tendency to take shelter in some kind of superior, if wholly unrelated and even irrelevant credential, is widespread and sometimes very problematic. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votesCreator described the ego in a previous GetWisdom LIVE program as follows: “The ego is a limited vessel, a limited capability that puts the self, first. As such, it is kind of like having a suit of armor that is self-protective. It might be awkward to wear, inconvenient, even drag you down from the sheer weight and inconvenience of suiting up before you make an excursion where you are at risk, but a potential lifesaver if you are attacked and would otherwise be vulnerable and perish. The suit of armor gives you a fighting chance at least. The ego, in the same way, is more like a weapon in being quite focused on your supremacy. In a sense, it is your last refuge to maintain an advantage and hold your ground to stand up to those who would bully you or intimidate, and provide a wherewithal to weather the storm.” The Dunning-Kruger effect appears to be the ego fulfilling this very function in a crude, imprecise, but very forceful and compelling manner. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votesCreator has previously discussed five principal selves that make up the human being—the deep subconscious, subconscious, cellular consciousness, primary or conscious self, and the higher self. What about the ego? Can it be, should it be, characterized as a “sixth self?” And if not, why not?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption231 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that some skills, muscle memory, and other proclivities we call natural talent, can be recorded in the akashic records, and re-introduced into the cellular consciousness of a new body in a new incarnation. This is how natural talent can be carried over from lifetime to lifetime. What about the ego? Is it also recorded in the akashic records and re-introduced in some fashion to a new incarnation? Is it, like karma and physical talent, left behind when one becomes a light being but re acquired upon a new incarnation (so the incarnating soul can essentially pick up where they left off)? Is the ego truly left behind when the departing consciousness enters the light and is it one of the big reasons there is more wisdom and clarity as light beings? Or is the ego of a particular lifetime utterly lost upon transition, and new incarnations start off with an essentially blank ego?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption198 views0 answers0 votesCreator has said that the angels have egos. It would be assumed then that light beings also have egos of some sort. Is there a difference between the ego of a physical incarnation, and the ego of a light being?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption214 views0 answers0 votesThe ego does not appear to be brain-dependent, as lost soul spirits, when encountered by human victims and healers and psychics, seem to display lots of functioning ego characteristics. Can Creator comment on the ego’s reliance or lack of reliance on the physical brain?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption197 views0 answers0 votesAt what age does the ego really take hold in a new incarnation? What can parents and caregivers do to help foster the healthy development of their child’s ego?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption203 views0 answers0 votesOver-inflated egos and the Dunning-Kruger effect seem to represent pressing healing needs for much of humanity. Can Creator share how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the best tools for bringing about the highest and best form of healing?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption183 views0 answers0 votesWe learned earlier from Creator that as many as one-third of humans today had lives as Anunnaki in the distant past. How did those individuals escape the karmic round robin of that existence to become humans? Even though the society itself continues to devolve, did some individuals still manage to evolve and ultimately escape incarnating there? Was escape an individual achievement, or a divine intervention, maybe both, depending on the individual? Or was it an act of divine grace where the individuals said, “ENOUGH! I’m not going back!” similar to the decision that many Maya made in choosing not to reincarnate here again? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Karma291 views0 answers0 votesThe Cliff Palace of Mesa Verde, in the Four Corners Region of the United States, is one of the most mysterious structures in the world. Built by the Anasazi native peoples, it appears to be built solely for protection from some grave external threat. Can Creator tell us approximately when it was built? Why was it built? Who built it? Was it wholly of human conception, design, and construction? How long did it take to build? Did it succeed or fail in its purpose, and why?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers263 views0 answers0 votesLegends handed down to today’s Zuni and Navajo tribes, the descendants of the Anasazi, tell of a great holocaust at the hands of giants. The story is that the medicine men of the tribes, at the time, established some kind of interdimensional contact with a Reptilian entity who taught them sorcery. Following this, the people fell into depravity. Even to the point of performing child sacrifice and even ritual cannibalism. Then one day, as the story goes, they naively opened some kind of portal through which scores of giants came through and destroyed their civilization in a most brutal fashion. What actually happened? It seems reasonable to assume that the humans were duped into believing that they brought this on themselves when there is no logical way they could control such a portal. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers242 views0 answers0 votesWhen a modern Native American academic discussed these portals or “stargates,” he drew a spiral in the sand to illustrate it. These spirals appear carved into the rock in numerous places in the American Southwest, but they also appear carved in stone megalithic ruins in the United Kingdom. Can Creator share with us what these spirals mean and signify? It is said some of these portals or stargates are still operative today. Is this true?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers250 views0 answers0 votesThousands of mounds throughout the Eastern United States were excavated and removed during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Untold thousands of human bones, but a significant number of giant bones were mysteriously removed and presumed destroyed. Creator has shared that some of the giant bones were full blooded Anunnaki. Considering a full-blooded Anunnaki had at least the potential to live to be a million years old, it would seem dying on Earth under “any” circumstances would be regarded as a great personal failing. What were the top three causes of death of full-blooded Anunnaki on Earth?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers293 views0 answers0 votes