DWQA Questions › Tag: DSMR
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
To minimize costs, is it advantageous to rely on divine augmentation while taking doses of the CBDNorth Full-Spectrum CBD Oil or the CBDMagic supplement only every fourth day, or twice a week for simplicity, especially if it is being done for prophylactic benefit? Is that a good recommendation to follow? Is there a minimum dose requirement for this to be effective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
92 views0 answers0 votes
For individuals who have a symptomatic virus-caused malady, would taking daily doses of the CBDNorth Full-Spectrum CBD Oil or the CBDMagic supplement rather than relying on divine augmentation to save money be advisable, if it can be afforded?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
91 views0 answers0 votes
The CBDMagic supplement is in capsule form, while the CBDNorth supplement is an oil extract. Is the latter more unpleasant to ingest?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
CannaComplete has 40 mg of hemp extract per capsule. Is their extract comparable to 40 mg of the extract in CBDMagic capsules? If so, CannaComplete at 40 mg/capsule would be in between the CBDMagic in the 1000 and 2000 mg total amounts per bottle, having 33 and 67 mg/capsule, respectively. Is this an inappropriate way to compare these products? Is it the activity in the extract, not the bulk amount which matters?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
You told us that Cannabitol 5000 is comparable to CannaComplete in effectiveness. What about their newer version, Cannabitol ECS5, which has an added proprietary blend in addition to the Cannabitol 5000 base? Is that just equal, or is it superior in efficacy as an antiviral and cardioprotective adjunct?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
90 views0 answers0 votes
Something like milk that is ingested orally seems an unlikely vector for biowarfare. The role of gastric juice as an antimicrobial defense is widely assumed because of its hydrochloric acid content. However, a 2005 review article summarized the literature about viruses, saying, “The role of gastric HCl in the defence against viral infection is not known.” (Tom C. Martinsen, et al., Gastric Juice: A Barrier Against Infectious Diseases, Basic and Clin. Pharmacol. and Toxicol., 96: 94-102, 2005.) Are the viruses causing the wide array of chronic illnesses in humans, resistant to degradation during transit through the stomach?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
Is widespread adoption of Holographic Memory Resolution alone, able to prepare humanity for Ascension in time, before the aliens return to carry out their planned annihilation of humanity?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
131 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Is it right to assume our current life bodies are a representation of a combination of other lifetimes of things we are here to work on? If so, our current body is informing us of the issues we need to work on from past/parallel lives, right? We know the majority of things are karmic and the divine is working behind the scenes in parallel timelines to bring about shifts, but to what extent are direct, current-life memories/traumas resolved through LHP-DSMR? It seems to me it could be a very low amount. That suggests the LHP-DSMR will typically not touch current-life memories and issues. How often is LHP-DSMR healing/resolving current-life memories/situations to bring relief to the person?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
134 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “It seems like that would almost be leading the person, so it is up to their conscious free will to still engage with their current-life traumas because that is still in their memory and their lesson to learn and grow from. Is this true? Perhaps there is divine grace in this arena for some? So is it really left up to the conscious being to have some sort of personal, conscious healing application to resolve what is in their current-life memory, almost no matter how much LHP-DSMR work is done?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
102 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “I worked with an LHP practitioner who has done thousands of sessions. Yet we get into an HMR session and horrible abuse memories from childhood are still intact and needing resolution, and perhaps why they haven’t gained total relief. What gives here? So how much current-life conscious healing work are we mandated to do regardless of how much divine healing or LHP-DSMRs are done?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
108 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “I guess I am just wishing to bring more relief quicker to more people, and especially LHP practitioners who we need on their A game, who don’t seem to engage often in other healing work, and I think that’s a travesty. Perhaps if they spent a small fraction of their time spent in LHP-DSMR but rather doing current-life, conscious, live therapies, and trauma resolution, they would improve and heal much faster, and their LHP-DSMRs would become subsequently stronger, making this a win-win and the ideal healing strategy, especially for LHP practitioners.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
107 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks about a hypothetical current life trauma and the healing journey undertaken with Holographic Memory Resolution: “For example, say you come in with a karmic imprint of sexual abuse. You are abused by your father growing up. You do hundreds of LHP-DSMRs for this issue of sexual abuse. However, when going into a live-HMR session, the memory is still intact. How often does this happen? Is there an imperative for the current life being to go through conscious trauma resolution practices, like HMR, to reframe and resolve the memory of the abuse? Does the divine not lead, per se, in reframing memories of one’s current life, but is able to do so in past lives since we are disconnected and most can’t consciously reach those root burdens to heal?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
103 views0 answers0 votes
Looking at the history of the dairy industry, it is clear that the U.S. government was instrumental in promoting milk consumption by children in public schools, universally. Similar actions occurred in the UK, Australia, etc. While there were powerful commercial vested interests in supporting these policies, is there a deeper, sinister influence behind making cow’s milk such a nutritional cornerstone?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
The scientific literature seems mixed in reflecting limited negative health associations with milk consumption. For example, there are studies suggesting an increase in prostate cancer, but not other cancers. Nutritional studies are notoriously complicated and prone to errors of interpretation because of the wide array of foodstuffs that can be positive or negative factors, and the long-term nature of such influences in likely producing a downside. But if milk is a major vector for harmful chronic viruses causing cancer, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular illness, diabetes, and dementia, among others, why hasn’t this been seen and pursued vigorously by researchers?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
Can you tell the wife of a recent suicide victim, why her husband took his life by shooting himself in the next room while she slept? Was there anything she could have done to prevent this tragedy?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
125 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…1819202122…57Next »