DWQA Questions › Tag: Dr. Richard Fleming
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer writes: “Dr. Richard Fleming is a Physicist and Nuclear Cardiologist. He first presented in 1994 a theory to the American Heart Association why people with the SARS-CoV-2 virus could manifest an inflammo-thrombotic disease – we now know as COVID-19. This theory of inflammation and heart disease accounts for why people with comorbidities were dying of COVID-19 – because they weren’t being treated for these known effects.” Is this the case, or only part of the story?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
325 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “He said this is not a naturally occurring virus (we know) and he followed the trails leading to the Gain-of-Function work, where the money came from, who funded it, etc. The spike protein contains human genome sequences inserted into the spike protein, and that this spike protein is doing EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO, which is to increase infection and create inflammation and blood clots.” Is this all true?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
391 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “He said the vaccines actually have components in them to DISSOLVE blood clots, indicating that this was a known effect.” Is this true?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
361 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “When the coronavirus was simply being transmitted person to person, it was only people with increased vulnerability due to comorbidities, such as diabetes and heart disease, that were having issues with inflammation and blood clots, which they were NOT being treated for. Now with the vaccine, the body is being turned into a spike protein-producing factory, and so people with otherwise healthy immune systems are now having inflammo-thrombotic issues. This is why we’re seeing the deaths he says.” Is this true? Are the vaccines causing deaths through this mechanism? If so, what is the incidence?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
386 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “He studied the FDA’s own EUA documents, and using THEIR data submitted to them by the vaccine-making pharmaceutical companies, he concluded that THERE WAS NO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE that any of the vaccines slow the spread of COVID-19. This was not HIS data, but EUA data provided by the vaccine manufacturers to the FDA. NO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE that these vaccines slowed the spread of infection. The media is saying there is 96% “efficacy.” But really what they’re saying, he says, is that 96% won’t have immediate side effects from the vaccines!!! That’s what the mainstream media is pushing as efficacy!” Is this correct?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
344 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “When you ask the question, BUT DOES THE VACCINE “**PROTECT**” ME??? He says the answer is NO. And their own data demonstrates this. The infection RATE of both the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations after two weeks to 28 days SHOW NO STATISTICAL DIFFERENCE, and again, that conclusion is based on data provided by the vaccine manufacturers themselves.” Is this correct?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
357 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “Now, this is where it gets important. The spike protein is not natural, it is GAIN-OF-FUNCTION artificially produced. IT IS CROSSING THE BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER. In animals, especially humanized mice, they develop spongiform encephalopathy, which is MAD COW DISEASE. In the rhesus macaque models, that about two weeks afterwards, they developed Lewy bodies in the brain that cause Alzheimer’s and other neurologic disorders. AND THOSE NUMBERS TRANSLATE INTO ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF FOR HUMAN BEINGS TO SEE THOSE SAME CONSEQUENCES.” What is the divine perspective on Dr. Fleming’s revelations?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
332 views0 answers0 votes