DWQA Questions › Tag: divinity
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Shaming can be seen as an assault on another person’s belief system. The one doing the shaming is trying to demonstrate that the belief being challenged is false or deficient in some way. This can be where there is power in numbers, and the more people that can be enlisted in joining the one attempting to shame, the more profound the shame actually experienced by the recipient can be. It’s not an exaggeration that profound public shaming and embarrassment can lead to both suicide and homicide. And while psychopaths are said to lack a conscience, shaming one publicly might be the last thing you ever do. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
60 views0 answers0 votes
The topic of shame is a broad one, involving both feeling and action. In almost every instance there is a need for healing being demonstrated. Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the perfect tools for addressing shame, avoiding shame, and developing the wisdom to use shame sparingly and with the greatest effectiveness for the most desirable outcomes for all affected beings?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
58 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “If there are clearly karmic effects in this lifetime (physical, mental, emotional, relationships, finances, etc.) is it wise to “wait” for LHP sessions to heal karmic underpinnings in other timelines, or “should” we try to overcome it as best we can in this lifetime, even though using the conscious mind and memory will be very limited in their effectiveness? Will ignorance and inaction compound the issue? Or will human action provide more intention-power to amplify healing speed? Given the limited effectiveness of medical science and psychological therapies it seems unclear what to do.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
71 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Fate often represents a fixed outcome; destiny is a sense of purpose that individuals actively work towards, influencing their choices and actions. To what degree is karma deterministic and the outcomes inevitable? For example, if someone has lung disease, and that has been created by the Law of Karma to rebalance wounds done to us by others in other lives, what is the difference karmically between passive acceptance of that illness in this lifetime as a rebalancing (fate) versus seeking the best medical and spiritual treatment for the condition (destiny)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
62 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What did Jesus Christ mean about the “kingdom of heaven” when he used that phrase? Especially the following from the Bible Book of Matthew 6:33, where Jesus says, “But rather seek ye first the kingdom of heaven and its righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.” Also, what kind of things is he referring to here? In another book, Luke 17:21, Jesus says, “The kingdom of heaven is within you.” Can Creator explain his meaning or what these words were intended to teach? What are we missing?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
103 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Please help me understand this: God says that most of our pain and suffering comes from the negative karma. However, when we feel it, we don’t know where it comes from because we cannot remember past lives, or go to the akashic records to see the cause of our pain (with the exception of some that can read akashic records). If the purpose of the Law of Karma is to be self-correcting, it seems that if someone CAUSES something, and later on sees the EFFECTS of that cause, it seems logical that the individual would want to know why and trace it back to that cause. Why has this setup NOT worked on the Anunnaki? Why do they NOT self-correct if they have the capability to see their akashic records?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
105 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Poets have often been regarded as having insight and intuition beyond most people’s reach. For example, the English poet Matthew Arnold (1822 –1888) finishes one of his poems: ‘Resolve to be thyself; and know that he, Who finds himself, loses his misery!’ This would seem to be what GetWisdom would call “coming into divine alignment and healing to a point of ascension.” To what extent can poetry, music, literature, and the arts generally achieve healing? Is their use hindered and discouraged by dark forces? Are the arts an overlooked method of healing in society compared to medical science?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
91 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “I’m writing to you today because I would love to get Creator’s feedback on a possible healing of someone I’ve done many Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions for. You might not know him, he is an Italian [musician]. Two years ago I found out that he was suffering from a serious illness, which he didn’t specify exactly but stated that it has attacked him very aggressively and that he was in constant pain from it. He then went radio-silent for a couple of years and apparently stopped his music production as well as any public appearances completely. Ever since I saw this I’ve been doing many LHP sessions for him and with a quite high level of intention because I’m a big fan of his music and was suspecting also that he might be targeted by the darkness for having brought many people joy over the years. So, imagine my surprise when yesterday I did a spontaneous Google search and found out that not only is he back and feeling much better but he will even perform at a festival next month… I’d like to ask Creator if this was mainly possible due to the LHP and also whether his dilemma was entirely karmic in origin or if it was some kind of punishment by the darkness.” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
91 views0 answers0 votes
He also asks: “Is he in need of further LHPs for this particular problem.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
90 views0 answers0 votes
Arriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
123 views0 answers0 votes
We know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
106 views0 answers0 votes
The Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
89 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
We know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
118 views0 answers0 votes
We know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
123…5Next »