DWQA Questions › Tag: divine wisdomFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “The Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, said what is even more scary is that they may come on Earth again trying to control the masses through a personification of Jesus as his second coming and people will follow them blindly not questioning the increase of more and more control. Is this all true? What can we do as Christians to not fall in this false coming?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Religions454 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “About what the Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, said, where are the fallen angelics in all this? Are the Anunnaki the fallen angelics? The Pleiadians do not mention them.”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers357 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “The Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, do not mention any other ETs such as the Reptilians and Arcturians and their role and interest in controlling and manipulating humans. They also do not mention Creator’s Plan in all the history of the Anunnaki. What would be the Pleiadians intention in not analyzing all these?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers463 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “About what the Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, said, they also claim to be us from the future and came back to fix some things needed to be done a long time ago, but do not mention what exactly.” Can you help us understand this?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Benevolent Extraterrestrials623 views0 answers0 votesIt has been observed that atheists have a kind of “hunt and destroy” approach to anything outside their world views. So while the would-be evangelist is attempting to empty and refill the cup of the atheist, the atheist is actually attempting to do the very same thing, but in reverse. Unfortunately, atheists are often better prepared in these contests, which is one of the reasons that if one of the parties is likely to come away disillusioned, it’s the evangelist and not the atheist. Can Creator comment on the importance of knowing what you are getting into, and choosing your battles carefully and wisely?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs246 views0 answers0 votesOne of the apparent attractions of atheism is that it is widely embraced by the smart, accomplished and savvy, while belief in the divine is portrayed as primitive, dumb, gullible, and the desperate clinging of people who can’t think for themselves and who are afraid of their own shadows. This is a VERY significant presumption to have to counter and dispel. Can Creator share the best strategy for countering this outlook most effectively?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs292 views0 answers0 votesCreator has shared that humans are divine, but that atheism leads inexorably to depravity. Most atheists have a kind of utopian outlook for atheism that itself is a kind of fairy tale that doesn’t hold water when examined critically. Showing them that all atheistic outlooks eventually lead to depravity on a gargantuan scale, has been found to be an effective, but not pleasant approach to “raining on their parade.” This seems contrary to the preferred divine means of spreading love through positive reinforcements and messaging. Can Creator comment on the importance of “telling it like it is?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs340 views0 answers0 votesThe reality and nature of consciousness is one of the central topics of contention when conversing with atheists. Most do not believe in the existence of non-local consciousness in any form. Yet Creator has shared that everything is consciousness in actuality, and the interlopers would seem to have an outlook on non-local consciousness that is not as strict as that embraced by human atheists. What is the difference in outlook if any? Do the interlopers view the universe as primarily “dead,” as opposed to the divine reality of it all being ALIVE? Creator shared that the alien outlook is that non-local consciousness is a kind of “echo” that is a reflection of consciousness, but not ACTUALLY consciousness? Can Creator clarify whether or how true that is?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs288 views0 answers0 votesIt has been observed, that for most human atheists, the REAL bone of contention, isn’t the existence or non-existence of God, but rather the rejection of a tyrannical, hypocritical, arbitrary and capricious God who they view as “no friend of theirs.” In some ways, it appears like an ironic rejection of the Extraterrestrial Alliance who in fact are the ones who actually behave this way. Yet, it’s God who suffers the rejection. Can Creator comment on this perspective of atheists?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs301 views0 answers0 votesIt’s a long conversation to bring an atheist to the point where a discussion on the relative power and promise of prayer can even begin to be discussed. Atheists seem to want to avoid this particular topic more than any other. Can Creator share any insights on why this appears to be the case?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs326 views0 answers0 votesHow do prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol help the atheist to come around to actual REALITY? The reality of the divine?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs322 views0 answers0 votesHow would you make a case defending the reality of the divine to a group of atheists?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs342 views0 answers0 votesA would-be good samaritan wants to help the homeless, who truly need assistance. He was not interested in providing money for booze and cigarettes. A woman on the street was shrieking “HELP ME! I’M HUNGRY!” Our would-be good samaritan offered to take her right then and there and buy her a sandwich. She declined and asked for money instead. He said, “no” and repeated his offer. This went back and forth for a couple rounds, but he stuck to his offer and refused to give her money. Suddenly she just “blew up” at him, swearing at him and telling him where to go (in so many words). Who was wrong here? Both of them perhaps?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma340 views0 answers0 votesThere was a career panhandler in a big midwestern city that would hold a cup at the same spot every day and say “Help the HomeLESS!” He’d been doing this for years – even decades. A fixture almost as much as the light post he leaned against. Turned out, he wasn’t truly homeless at all, and shared a rather expensive apartment with another career panhandler. When asked about the apparent hypocrisy, he said simply that he rented rather than owned, so he wasn’t really lying. The problem is this individual and his partner help to reinforce the impression that many if not most homeless were not in the dire straits they appear to be in. What is the divine perspective on this type of career?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma324 views0 answers0 votesA man was portrayed on a 60 Minutes television episode back in the 1980s, who would dress like a bum and drive to his favorite spot in his own newer car, park the car out of sight, and work a freeway entrance ramp. He was observed by a reporter to leave the spot every couple of hours to make a call at a payphone. He was approached and asked who he was calling. Turned out it was his stockbroker. He confessed he made approximately $60,000 a year panhandling (in the 1980s when $60,000 was an above-average income) and had a very successful investment portfolio. When challenged, he failed to see any moral dilemma in what he was doing, but in managing a successful stock portfolio, he was clearly capable of performing successfully in a more traditional occupation. What are the karmic implications of that man’s occupational choice?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma317 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola