DWQA Questions › Tag: divine disconnection
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
In the Bible, Romans chapter 16, verses 17 to 19, the Apostle Paul says: “I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people. Everyone has heard about your obedience, so I rejoice because of you; but I want you to be wise about what is good, and innocent about what is evil.” This passage, because it uses the word “appetite” is widely regarded by Biblical scholars as referencing “wolves in sheep’s clothing.” What does it say about the imperative to seek wisdom and overcome naiveté, especially regarding consensus narratives shaped and maintained by politicians, the media, and even the clergy?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
334 views0 answers0 votes
The wolf in sheep’s clothing implies the presence and manipulation of the “evil genius,” difficult to not only spot, but just as difficult, if not more so, to warn the fellow sheep about the wolf in their midst, leading them astray. If one only takes things at face value, they will never see beyond the costume and discern the wolf inside. What does the metaphor of the wolf in sheep’s clothing tell us about not trusting the obvious?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
316 views0 answers0 votes
In praying for discernment, we are, perhaps sometimes unwittingly, asking to see the unpleasant more than the pleasant, and for help identifying the wolves in sheep’s clothing in our midst. Can Creator share how prayer for discernment and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help us develop the capacity and the needed strength to both see the wolves in our midst and do something truly effective about them?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
430 views0 answers0 votes
Star Trek’s “Mr. Spock” is arguably one of the most memorable, intriguing, and even endearing figures in all of science fiction. Spock, the first officer of the Starship Enterprise in the Star Trek television series of the late 1960s, was depicted as a half human/half Vulcan humanoid with pointy ears, from the planet Vulcan in a star system many light-years from Earth. Vulcan philosophy centered around the concept of logic. The highest objective of a traditional Vulcan was to control or suppress all emotion, establishing a purely logical being. Having learned that many science fiction characters have their origin in divine inspiration, we ask Creator, was Mr. Spock also a product of divine inspiration?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
334 views0 answers0 votes
As we have learned that outside the Milky Way Galaxy all beings have a direct connection to Creator, the possibility of an actual civilization like Vulcan where the highest objective was suppression or control of emotion, can only exist in the Milky Way Galaxy. Does the Vulcan culture as depicted in Star Trek actually exist in one or more civilizations in the Milky Way Galaxy?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
371 views0 answers0 votes
Assuming that Creator is not going to endorse the suppression of emotion as love is emotion, and love is life force energy which all beings need, what about the SELF CONTROL of emotion?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
346 views0 answers0 votes
While the character of Mr. Spock endeavored to be always logical, he was nevertheless depicted as a good person. The meta-message was that being a good, helpful, and even generous person was logical. What is Creator’s perspective on goodness being logical?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
311 views0 answers0 votes
The Vulcans were depicted as highly telepathic beings and they were also portrayed as believing in the continuation of consciousness beyond the death of the body. Non-local consciousness is widely depicted as a product of “run-away imagination and emotion” rather than “rational logic” among today’s secularists. Yet the Vulcans had pronounced non-local consciousness abilities, and complex mystical religious traditions while being logical in the extreme. This is a strange mix that runs counter to the current atheistic outlook on logic. Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
322 views0 answers0 votes
The cousins of the Vulcans were the “Romulans” depicted as descending from the same ancestral species. Unlike the Vulcans, the Romulans EMBRACED their aggressive nature and allowed their lives to be ruled by passion. The result being that such passions led inevitably, to depravity and evil. We know the interlopers are both aggressive and atheist. Which depicts the interlopers better, the Vulcans or the Romulans? And if the answer is the Romulans, what does that say about the advocacy of controlling one’s passions as the Vulcans strive to do?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
299 views0 answers0 votes
We know that all humans are subject to interloper mind control manipulation. And that such manipulation takes advantage of anxiety and passion for much if not most of its emotive power. So it seems the Vulcan pursuit of emotional control was an attempt to gain mastery of the very features of the self that the interlopers take full advantage of in humans, essentially depriving the interlopers of this influence over the individual. How much does mastery of one’s emotional nature and passions, and the ability to successfully cope with and neutralize traumas, protect or even make one immune to mind control manipulation?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
326 views0 answers0 votes
The desire to be rid of all emotion can only have its genesis in deep trauma—trauma so deep and pronounced that even love is suspect and untrusted to the extent it is thought best to dispense with it altogether. Obviously, this is a trap, and while Vulcans are depicted as good and generous, we know lovelessness can only lead to depravity. So as appealing to logic as this logic may seem, the abandonment of love can only be regarded as the highest of follies and the gravest of errors. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
316 views0 answers0 votes
What is Creator’s perspective on the phrase “disciplining the mind?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
349 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator share how it is not logic but LOVE that is the highest pursuit and attainment, and how prayer work and Lightworker Healing Protocol are, indeed, the most logical pursuit there is?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
338 views0 answers0 votes
Loneliness is distress and sadness over being alone because one has no friends or company. People can become friendless and companionless for many reasons. Some of those reasons can be a result of choices made, and others a result of circumstances. Still, the consensus seems to be, that no one has a real excuse to be lonely. That if you’re lonely it’s somehow your fault because you made poor choices, you didn’t become someone people want to be around, you’re not interesting, or fun, etc. Some may even see it as a symptom of selfishness or even narcissism—too much focus on the needs and desires of the self, and not enough focus on the needs and desires of others. What is the divine perspective on loneliness and how much responsibility does the self have for this dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
374 views0 answers0 votes
How much is loneliness a result of people isolating themselves as a result of fear of rejection? A more tolerable form of suffering than being overtly rejected when one reaches out to others for desired human contact and affection?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
328 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…4546474849…56Next »