DWQA Questions › Tag: divine
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “The following questions are something I have been pondering for quite some time. When I heard the channeling of Josef Mengele, approximately at the 2:00:00 time mark, talking about Santa Claus, it triggered this question again. Here is the quote from the channeling: “…We can tell you there is a Santa Claus in the Divine that does more than bring gifts but it requires belief.” I can tell you unabashedly that I never stopped believing in Santa Claus. My belief has only matured and expanded as I have gotten older. My daughters just turned 7 and 10, respectively, in September. They both still believe in Santa. I know at some point in the near future the topic of Santa Claus being real will come up. I do not like to lie to my children. I would love some clarity on this subject so as I can be as honest and truthful with my children as appropriate. From my research, there seems to have been a Santa Claus or a Saint Nicholas in the past. Can you tell me if there ever was a Santa Claus in the physical and what their purpose or life mission was/is?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 hours ago • 
1 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Can you please elaborate and expand on the quote from the Josef Mengele channeling where they were quoted saying that, “We can tell you there is a Santa Claus in the Divine that does more than bring gifts but it requires belief.” What more does Santa do besides bring gifts? And what sort of gifts does he provide?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 hours ago • 
3 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Some people have stated that Santa is an allegory for God. While I can see the similarities, I feel that in this case, Santa is his own person and not just an allegory. What is the truth? What is the divine perspective and important to know?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 hours ago • 
1 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “I am looking for inspiration in how I can approach this topic with my children when the time approaches. I hope that these answers will help bring clarity and benefit to others in parallel. I know this may seem silly to you but it is important to me. I’m taking a leap of faith reaching out to you on this subject but I feel it will be most beneficial for all and a surprise for many others. Integrity is important to me and I don’t want to mislead my children or promote falsehoods.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 hours ago • 
1 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “If there are clearly karmic effects in this lifetime (physical, mental, emotional, relationships, finances, etc.) is it wise to “wait” for LHP sessions to heal karmic underpinnings in other timelines, or “should” we try to overcome it as best we can in this lifetime, even though using the conscious mind and memory will be very limited in their effectiveness? Will ignorance and inaction compound the issue? Or will human action provide more intention-power to amplify healing speed? Given the limited effectiveness of medical science and psychological therapies it seems unclear what to do.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
75 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Fate often represents a fixed outcome; destiny is a sense of purpose that individuals actively work towards, influencing their choices and actions. To what degree is karma deterministic and the outcomes inevitable? For example, if someone has lung disease, and that has been created by the Law of Karma to rebalance wounds done to us by others in other lives, what is the difference karmically between passive acceptance of that illness in this lifetime as a rebalancing (fate) versus seeking the best medical and spiritual treatment for the condition (destiny)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Please help me understand this: God says that most of our pain and suffering comes from the negative karma. However, when we feel it, we don’t know where it comes from because we cannot remember past lives, or go to the akashic records to see the cause of our pain (with the exception of some that can read akashic records). If the purpose of the Law of Karma is to be self-correcting, it seems that if someone CAUSES something, and later on sees the EFFECTS of that cause, it seems logical that the individual would want to know why and trace it back to that cause. Why has this setup NOT worked on the Anunnaki? Why do they NOT self-correct if they have the capability to see their akashic records?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
107 views0 answers0 votes
Will code words grow in strength with reuse?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
157 views0 answers0 votes
Can a code word launching be added together with all other code word launches to gain further empowerment?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
Arriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
We know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
The Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
90 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
115 views0 answers0 votes
We know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
122 views0 answers0 votes
We know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
87 views0 answers0 votes
123…10Next »