DWQA Questions › Tag: divide and conquerFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThere are actually young adults today, especially in the United States, who don’t even know when World War II was fought, who fought in it, and how the outcome shaped the world they live in. This seems a two-fold problem. The first being the absence of such instruction in today’s education curriculums, and the incredible lack of curiosity about the past, especially an important one less than a century old on the part of the students themselves. Can Creator comment?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Potential265 views0 answers0 votesIn spite of the confusion and jumbled and contradictory narratives about our past, it seems one of the more revelatory means to witness the presence and influence of the divine and also help in building one’s belief quotient, would indeed be the study of history. In surveying the history of warfare, in particular, the presence of divine intervention can be found in lopsided contests where the disadvantaged party wins a shocking and almost inexplicable victory in a short timeframe and with a minimum of death and destruction to both sides. The Battle of Midway in World War II is one example that comes to mind. What is Creator’s perspective on this observation?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Potential257 views0 answers0 votesIn contrast to the Battle of Midway, can Creator comment on the turning point that was the Battle of Stalingrad in World War II? Unlike Midway, which was decided in less than a week, Stalingrad was a brutal bloodbath that ground on for months in the most horrific of conditions, both natural and manmade. Russian soldiers, in particular, feared their own leadership as much as the enemy in many cases. Stalingrad was called a “moonscape,” bombed into oblivion and utterly unrecognizable. Where was the divine in this contest? And what contrast would Creator make between the Battle of Midway and the Battle of Stalingrad?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Potential298 views0 answers0 votesOne of the most enigmatic events in modern world history is the Battle of Waterloo. It remains enigmatic right down to the characterization of the forces involved. Some regard Napoleon Bonaparte as just another Hitler, while others view him as a failed George Washington. Figuring out who the “good guys” and the “bad guys” in this contest were is by no means an easy exercise. Both sides were heavily populated with Christians, many of whom certainly prayed for protection and divine intervention in order to achieve victory for their side. In the grand scheme of things, was Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo a divine setback, or a divine victory? If it was a setback, what was lost? And if a victory, what was achieved in the way of divine support for humanity in the bigger contest with the interlopers?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Potential333 views0 answers0 votesWe learned in a recent radio show, about the astounding level of divine protection granted to keep French Marshal Michel Ney alive, and eventually allow his escape to America where he lived out his life in peace, if not in contentment. Many, if not most, historians actually blame Ney himself for Napoleon’s French loss at Waterloo. Were there in fact decisions Ney made that could have changed the outcome of Waterloo, and arguably the course of world history, and if so, why did the divine not inspire him appropriately, while at the same time protecting his life in the most astonishing ways?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Potential257 views0 answers0 votesFrom the divine perspective, did Ney “blow it,” and make one of the biggest military mistakes in the history of warfare? If so, what are the karmic ramifications of doing your best, but still failing with some of the highest stakes imaginable?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Potential256 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that time travel can indeed alter history, and the Mandela effect is one of the more visible ways this can occur, with some older generations remembering Nelson Mandela dying in prison, while today of course, we know he eventually was released and went on to become the President of South Africa. There is a saying that “the past is prologue,” yet we further learn it is hardly etched in stone. Can Creator comment?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Potential563 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can change the entire history of mankind and even the universe, both the future and the past?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Potential304 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Do you have any objection to my contacting people from the disclosure community about your work?” Is this something that would be dangerous for her or me, and would a possible benefit to others outweigh these risks?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Guidance254 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “The book, Inconvenient Facts, by Gregory Wrightstone gives information that differs greatly from mainstream science. Is the information in the book about the periodic climate changes and the decline in CO2 concentration reliable?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions292 views0 answers0 votesRarely is justice swift, and when it is, it is often unjust itself. This puts the victim in a kind of limbo waiting for closure that may be long in coming. This leaves the victim, as well as onlookers, feeling powerless. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma400 views0 answers0 votesThis whole notion of closure seems less than ideal. It is regarded as of the utmost importance to achieve, and yet, in the end, how much does it actually change? The victim has no role to play but to sit and wait for something outside of themselves to happen. Can Creator comment on this notion of achieving closure, as something that must be done for the victim, rather than by the victim?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma363 views0 answers0 votesVictimhood is widely equated with powerlessness. We expect victims to be powerless, fragile, distraught, and in need of protection and isolation. This seems counterintuitive if the goal is to empower victims to heal themselves to the greatest extent possible. The thinking seems to be, if we just leave victims alone, somehow their suffering will slowly evaporate and they’ll bounce back when they are ready. Once again, waiting for something to happen to them rather than making something happen themselves. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma363 views0 answers0 votesVictims are often thought of as “damaged goods.” This has been especially true in regard to the crime of rape, to such an extreme that some cultures have even blamed the victims themselves, and had them put to death along with the perpetrator, or even instead of the perpetrator. There is truth to the notion that emotional trauma can be crippling, and transform a once happy and gregarious person into someone almost unrecognizable. Some victims are so conscious of this fact, that they go out of their way to say, “It was no big deal.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma351 views0 answers0 votesIn all these questions we have been exploring the idea of the innocent victim who has no duty, and to whom everything is owed by agents and circumstances outside of themselves, that victims are special, but even so, may be regarded as undesirable damaged goods by some, or even many. In contrast, Creator said this in last week’s radio show: “As the guardian of your own soul, you are responsible even for healing what is done to you by others.” This seems to be quite a departure from the notion of the helpless victim, powerless to remedy their own situation. Can Creator comment further?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma360 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola