DWQA Questions › Tag: divide and conquerFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThis same scientist, in an obvious attempt to discuss God, but somehow remain “scientific,” invented the term “G.O.D.” which he used to suggest a Guiding, Organizing, Designing process. His thinking was clearly that characterizing God in this way would make Creator more “palatable” to the overwhelmingly atheist scientific community. What does Creator think of this descriptive construct? Helpful or harmful? What does Creator think of being labeled “a process?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness211 views0 answers0 votesThis same scientist was contacted by Chris Robinson, a man who claimed to get prophetic dreams after a near-death experience ten years earlier. Over the years, evidence obtained through his dreams had helped put many criminals behind bars. Murderers who thought they had escaped were caught. Given this means of uncovering evidence, there truly cannot be such a thing as a “perfect crime.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness209 views0 answers0 votesThe scientist mentioned in the previous questions put together a scientific experiment to test Chris Robinson’s prophetic dreaming ability, which he called “The Ten Days in Arizona Experiment.” Before falling asleep, Chris Robinson would ask the universe, in his head, to be shown in his dreams, where he would be taken the next day. In the morning he would write down the details of his dream. Meanwhile, the scientist preselected ten unusual local locations and placed them in envelopes that were to be shuffled before one was selected as the day’s destination. To make a long story short, Chris Robinson was shockingly correct for all ten locations, including one that was substituted unintentionally because of unanticipated obstacles. What can Creator tell us about Chris Robinson’s ability?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness209 views0 answers0 votesThe above experiment proposes a number of intriguing, and some might regard disquieting questions. We are told the future is not preordained. Yet this experiment seems to propose otherwise. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness187 views0 answers0 votesWas Chris Robinson’s ability a result of time travel on the part of his deep subconscious and other participants such as his higher self and even Creator, and simply relaying to him in the dream state what was discovered?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness182 views0 answers0 votesAssuming there are always multiple timelines, was it just coincidence that all ten timelines were successfully dreamed of? What if the experiment was run for 100 days, or 1000? Would he still be 100% accurate? Because the dream was always about the next day, and not the next week or next month, or next year, was the timeline more certain, more “crystalized?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness188 views0 answers0 votesDr. Milton Erickson had a patient who became inexplicably hostile toward her best friend and sought his assistance in trying to discover why. During the combined psychoanalytic and hypnotic investigation, she also revealed hostility toward her father. It turned out that her father and best friend were having an affair, and were both shocked that their efforts at keeping it secret met such profound failure. Did this patient either witness something directly that she repressed away from her conscious awareness, or was she in fact unconsciously, intuitively, aware of both her best friend’s and father’s betrayal of her mother, and her anger and hostility were manifestations of that subconscious intuitive awareness? What does this tell us about trying to get away with something as hurtful as adultery, or any clandestine potentially hurtful behavior?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness200 views0 answers0 votesDr. Milton Erickson conducted a number of experiments in his career where he was able to use hypnosis to project the subject into a patient-created fantasized future with a positive therapeutic outcome. Usually, the future would be a common realistically achievable goal, such as having a good time at a friend’s wedding or getting a promotion. It’s amazing how often the future would manifest almost precisely as the patient would visualize it—in great detail. Was Erickson simply helping the patient to choose a valid timeline they were unable to choose on their own without his assistance? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness243 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the best means for responding to negative feelings and forebodings?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness308 views0 answers0 votesIn a recent radio show on Academic Gatekeeping, Creator shared this, “The reality is the biggest part of the mind is unreachable to conscious awareness or even ordinary hypnotic trance procedures.” Can Creator expand on the use of the word “ordinary” in this context? Dr. Milton H. Erickson was no “ordinary” hypnotist. Did ANY of his techniques and methodologies reach and/or influence the deep subconscious, even though he certainly had no complete appreciation of the true reality and nature of what it was he was interacting with?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind200 views0 answers0 votesMilton Erickson spent a day in 1950 at the home of Aldous Huxley. Huxley is the celebrated author of A Brave New World. Huxley did a form of self-hypnosis he called “Deep Reflection.” On that day Erickson and Huxley did some remarkable consciousness explorations. The two men had agreed to jointly publish a collaborative work on their findings. A decade passed, and Erickson was looking to bring the collaborative project to fruition when disaster struck. Huxley lost his home and all his notes and manuscripts in the great Bel-Air, California fire of 1961. Afterward, Huxley informed Erickson that he would not resume their collaboration—the loss was too great. What’s the story behind this disaster, and was Huxley specifically targeted with a backlash for his life’s work?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind214 views0 answers0 votesThe word “somnambulist” is the label for sleepwalkers. Erickson and other hypnotists use the word to also describe a person who enters a trance state from which they emerge with full amnesia (a total forgetting) of the trance, and everything that occurred during it, just like sleepwalkers when they awaken. Can Creator share with us what’s behind sleepwalking and why it affects some people but not others?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind219 views0 answers0 votesSome people even go into a somnambulistic trance when driving and report that hours can pass by without their conscious awareness or any recollection of the drive itself. Yet they safely reach their destination, as if by “magic.” The other day, Brian was driving his daughter home and engaged in a conversation with her. Suddenly he found himself on a familiar street going in a direction away from his destination. Brian realized he had no recollection of making the necessary right-hand turn to get on that street. He had a full amnesia of it. This was the first time in his entire life, that he vividly experienced this phenomenon with full recognition of the implications. Was this orchestrated to happen? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind207 views0 answers0 votesIt appears the conscious or “awake” mind can focus on only one task at a time. For instance, the conscious mind cannot read a book and do a counting exercise at the same time. Yet when hypnotized to the somnambulistic level (the level that results in amnesia upon awakening), this ability to multitask has been readily demonstrated. Can Creator explain why this is so, and what levels of the mind are participating?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind200 views0 answers0 votesErickson treated a couple of patients with an affective (wholly psychological) writing disorder. Neither could write but could do any number of other complex hand tasks like using tools or knitting. He was unable to treat one of the patients, but with the other, he used hypnosis to “transfer” the handicap to the other non writing hand. This finally enabled this patient to resume writing successfully, but with the effect that the other hand would go numb, every time they went to write something. So while this is difficult to label a “healing,” it is a creative workaround to the problem and was a great help to the patient. What was really happening here, why was Erickson successful with one, but not the other patient, and what is truly needed to heal such disorders?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind200 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola