DWQA Questions › Tag: disinformationFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “Can you check with Creator to see if the channeler I learned about would be suitable to support GetWisdom and the Deep Subconscious Channeling work you are doing?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls267 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “The book, Inconvenient Facts, by Gregory Wrightstone gives information that differs greatly from mainstream science. Is the information in the book about the periodic climate changes and the decline in CO2 concentration reliable?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions283 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “A friend wrote this, ‘The Arcturians are still trying to get the message through to us that there are ‘dark’ beings trying to interfere with us. I think the only reason they are so insistent on this is because we are so resistant to wanting to see that truth, because it’s been suppressed for so long…'” What is behind this message?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Caution375 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “I saw a video made by a prominent channeler with a huge following. She posted a video yesterday and it already has 6,000 likes! Different in tone from her usual expansiveness, rather somber, she’s addressing the topic of having to be aware of the dark. Her guides told her that millions of humans will die in the coming time and she has to tell her followers that they are here to transmute evil and have to learn to see it, not look away, keep their hearts open, be courageous, stand steady, etc. And not insist on love and light all the time.” Is she corrupted?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Caution401 views0 answers0 votesHow much does past life trauma stemming from being a member of the wrong consensus, play into people’s current perceived need to be in the “right” one today? The right one being the “safest” one, perhaps?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Problems in Society360 views0 answers0 votesOne of the most maddening things for independent thinkers to put up with is the widespread tendency for people to first vet the source of recommended information before deciding whether they will even look at the new information or not. This can get downright comical when people will refuse to click on a link to a “questionable” website, that is in fact a link to a story on another site they actually approve of, or appears to support something they believe. Can Creator share why this seems like “enlightened” behavior to these people?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Problems in Society333 views0 answers0 votesA client asks: “Is the book I mentioned by a channeler, based on disinformation or are the prophecies accurate? Who are the little monks who give her information? Are they a corrupted source?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls268 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I was outside this weekend and was looking up at a perfectly blue sky with the moon showing clearly and noticed three objects really high in the sky. I thought it might be birds flying very high but they seemed to shimmer at times and were flying perfectly spaced the entire time and very smoothly. Were these extraterrestrial craft or just some regular objects?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Caution424 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “In regard to the disclosure agenda the Extraterrestrial Alliance are potentially planning, how do we reject their assistance? Seeing as how the major political leaders and organizations have been corrupted and may have either hybrids or Reptilians at the top, how do we tell them to leave us and not interfere without causing a backlash from them that would cause mass chaos and death? If the majority of people don’t accept them as potential leaders, will that be enough to start an ascension process of some kind? I can’t see that they would just accept our lack of support for them and leave us alone. I feel like they would continue subjugating us in some way. What can the average person do? Is this information sharing, such as the teachings at GetWisdom, what will potentially open our minds and help us save ourselves at that time?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Divine Caution575 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “In your videos, you mention that it is easy for channelers to be lured by imposters. We have been following a woman for some time who is channeling her son, who has passed. I wonder if you can confirm whether those channelings are trustworthy?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Spirits391 views0 answers0 votesIs the hypothesis of the scientist I read in his article, an accurate prediction of a major downside from using spike protein mRNA vaccines?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19409 views0 answers0 votesThere have been prominent announcements from the FDA about the inadvisability and dangers of people using ivermectin to treat COVID-19. Caution about taking pill formulations intended for large animals by humans is understandable, but this seems to have the same feel as the trashing of hydroxychloroquine early and often by the medical establishment exaggeration of possible side effects and even alteration of the data in clinical trials to make it falsely look both ineffective and highly toxic. Is that planned or underway to deliberately undercut further studies of ivermectin?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19343 views0 answers0 votesWill further clinical studies of fluvoxamine in patients with COVID-19 be suppressed by the US medical establishment as they have done for hydroxychloroquine?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19297 views0 answers0 votesIn a preliminary study of adult outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19, patients treated with fluvoxamine, compared with placebo, had a lower likelihood of clinical deterioration. There was clinical deterioration in 0 of 80 patients in the fluvoxamine group and in 6 of 72 patients in the placebo group (absolute difference, 8.7% [95% CI, 1.8%-16.4%] from survival analysis; log-rank P = .009). The fluvoxamine group had 1 serious adverse event and 11 other adverse events, whereas the placebo group had 6 serious adverse events and 12 other adverse events. Is this a worthwhile agent for COVID-19 management? How would it compare with hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19297 views0 answers0 votesAn osteopathic physician and frequent spokesperson on the Internet says there are at least 10 ways that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines can cause serious side effects in human recipients. Is this the case, or an exaggeration? Why is she beating this drum?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19520 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola