DWQA Questions › Tag: death rates
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A preprint by C. Alegria, et al. reports an investigation that tracked neoplasm deaths among 15 to 44-year-olds by evaluating crude data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). They found while the rate of neoplasm deaths declined from 2010 to 2019, there was a statistically significant uptick in 2021 and 2022, the years following introduction of the Covid-19 vaccine. Also, there was a highly significant increase in all-cause mortality, which never exceeded minus 5% to plus 5% from 2010 to 2019, but reached 20% in 2020, 34% in 2021, and 18% in 2022, all “abnormally high.” Were the increased neoplasm-associated deaths and also the excess all-cause mortality consequences, at least in part, due to contaminating viruses in the vaccines?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
115 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Our family is dealing with Covid infections right now. Persisting coughs and out of breath just walking to another room. Does Creator advise getting a booster at this time? I know previous vaccines 4 years ago eventually became laced with harmful nanotechnology.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
A recent published study showed the long-term chronic effects of COVID-19 can be significant. Studies have shown that six months after being diagnosed with COVID-19, the risk of developing an autoimmune disease is two to three times that of an uninfected person. That was true for 13 different autoimmune diseases. What is the mechanistic link behind this?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
155 views0 answers0 votes
Were the data showing a 2-3-fold higher incidence of autoimmune disease within 6 months of having a Covid-19 infection, possibly due to many patients having had the Covid-19 vax, which you have told us is now sometimes doctored with autoimmune disease viruses?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
158 views0 answers0 votes
Studies are showing more and more evidence of increased anxiety, depression, and suicide of children due to the Covid-19 lockdowns and having only remote learning, with social deprivation. Is there more to the story? Were they being mind-controlled to undermine them psychologically?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
223 views0 answers0 votes
A supporter asks: “A university researcher in the UK has analyzed information from the United States Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System showing that the COVID vaccine manufacturers providing vaccines to the United States have been releasing at somewhat regular intervals certain numbered vaccine batches that have resulted in remarkably high numbers of deaths, disabilities or other adverse reactions, in comparison to other batches which have resulted in very few or no deaths or serious reactions. Has any of this data or its analysis resulted from manipulations? Have the interlopers or their minions begun a program of “doctoring” some of the vaccine batches to make them more dangerous? What is the divine perspective on the accuracy and meaning of this data and its analysis?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
287 views0 answers0 votes
A supporter asks: “Are the vaccine-induced artificial spike proteins causing massive infertility because of the effects on women and girls’ reproductive systems?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
291 views0 answers0 votes
A new report from Johns Hopkins University researchers reviewing hundreds of publications, concluded that lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe, including school closings, workplace closings, and shelter-in-place strategies, had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19. The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by only about 0.2%. They concluded, “We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality.” On the other hand, there were global negative impacts: “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.” This seems to be a human vindication of Creator’s perspectives about the intent of the pandemic and its course. Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
250 views0 answers0 votes
Will the booster shot as a follow-up to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines be more toxic than the initial vaccination in causing a repeat exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, analogous to what you have warned will be more severe consequences with repeated actual infections with the virus?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
353 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about concerns raised by Dr. Peter McCullough, a top Cardiologist: “The problem with the vaccine is Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE). Animals under study did not have initial adverse responses to coronaviruses, but when later re-exposed to the same or similar viruses, they basically had an autoimmune response and died. We know SARS-CoV-2 is dangerous. So it stands to reason that a vaccine designed to prime the immune system will carry risks. Creator has been careful to say, that OVERALL, people are better off, and the risks to health, and perhaps even long-term health, are LESS with the vaccine, than with facing COVID without any protection. The problem is, people have NO IDEA that the vaccine has such dire risks associated with it. Risks for a “few” granted, but if you are one of the unlucky ones, the risks can be quite severe, up to and including death.” Is Antibody-dependent Enhancement a serious concern in human vaccine recipients?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
316 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “There are 14,000 deaths registered in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The swine flu vaccine was stopped after around 25 deaths. Just to put things in perspective.” Are vaccine-related deaths truly that large? Is the rate of deaths from the vaccine larger, and from a different cause, than infection with COVID-19 itself?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
354 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Some doctors were concerned about blood clots in the capillary system—too small to show up on X-rays. The only way to detect these clots, which I suspect is detecting NOT-normal blood coagulation activity and excessive clotting conditions, is a test called the D-dimer: https://labcorp.com/help/patient-test-info/d-dimer. The doctors concerned about this, believe the long-term health impacts are potentially grave. In fact, they are advising their patients to immediately get on prescription blood thinners to combat this condition. But here is the REALLY concerning piece of information. SIXTY-TWO PERCENT of all vaccine recipients who have taken the D-dimer test, test POSITIVE for excessive clotting conditions. What is Creator’s perspective? Is this anything to truly worry about? What are the implications if any? Or is it a temporary and mostly harmless response for the vast majority of vaccine recipients?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
288 views0 answers0 votes
Are any parts of this whistleblower report accurate: “In a startling revelation, the Chinese Communist Party has been found to have been low-balling the infection and death rates. Coronavirus infection rates are currently believed to be 4.5 million, with 1 million dead. A source I know inside the US Public Health Corps stated that they have received plans for emergency quarantine of Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Chicago, and immediate evacuations of New York City, Washington DC, and other major metropolitan areas, to resettlement camps being erected in South Dakota.”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
459 views0 answers0 votes
Ask Question