DWQA Questions › Tag: consciousnessFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesCan the potential complexity of treating viruses as clients more like people, to better define dialog for the LHP and DSMR protocols needed to reckon with and negotiate a withdrawal as predators, be avoided by simply including “viruses and other predatory organisms infecting people” on the list of clients to be worked on with the protocols. That way, the entire protocols and all their requests could be utilized or adapted as needed by the divine realm to best address these sources of outside consciousness acting as a scourge, without our having to learn how to describe talking to such organisms to gain their cooperation. Would listing them along with the other types of beings to be worked on, bring all the power needed for the divine realm to do their utmost in dealing with chronic viruses and parasitic organisms?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol71 views0 answers0 votesIs there more needed, to be added or changed, in the protocols to further strengthen their effectiveness in dealing with viruses and other similar scourges?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol73 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “What positive purpose do innocent bugs like crickets, who fill the evenings with a cacophony of calls, serve in our world? I recall this phenomenon in the country around my old pond on the farm but have noticed it in the city as well. I had thought it was all frogs but in the city it has to be crickets. I suspect they are a marvel for us to enjoy rather than the contrary.” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Physical Universe95 views0 answers0 votesGiven the large and growing list of chronic human diseases you have confirmed are actually viral in origin, it is shocking to see this must encompass a huge number of unhealthy people, given that the list includes so many of the most common maladies. Can you help us put in perspective this huge dilemma that is still completely unappreciated by medical science? What percent of all cases of chronic illness are actually viral in origin and what does that say about the history and current practice of medicine?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers84 views0 answers0 votesTaken together, what percent of cases of asthma are viral in origin and would be helped by taking our Antiviral Regimen?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers68 views0 answers0 votesWhat percent of childhood asthma and adult-onset asthma cases are viral in origin and would be helped by taking our Antiviral Regimen?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers62 views0 answers0 votesWhat percent of cases of intermittent asthma are viral in origin and would be helped by taking our Antiviral Regimen?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers69 views0 answers0 votesWhat percent of cases of persistent asthma are viral in origin and would be helped by taking our Antiviral Regimen?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers54 views0 answers0 votesWhat percent of cases of allergic asthma are viral in origin and would be helped by taking our Antiviral Regimen?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers61 views0 answers0 votesWhat percent of cases of non-allergic asthma are viral in origin and would be helped by taking our Antiviral Regimen?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers54 views0 answers0 votesIs exercise-induced asthma strictly karmic in origin? What kinds of past trauma would cause it?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Karma65 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Can you ask Creator about my asthma that disappeared? Is it fully cured or just improved, and if cured, am I good to go for the rest of my days here?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Karma56 views0 answers0 votes“Shame on you!” We’ve all heard it, and we’ve all said it. The Oxford Dictionary defines shame as both a feeling and an action, “a painful feeling of humiliation or distress caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behavior,” as well as, to “make (someone) feel ashamed.” Shame is a feeling nearly everyone everywhere tries to avoid, with the irony being that those most vulnerable to criticism are the ones most prone to overindulge in attempting to elicit that feeling in others. In some ways the dichotomy of shame is perhaps the most profound of hypocrisy litmus tests there is. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Limiting Beliefs135 views0 answers0 votesPavlov’s dog. If that term is unfamiliar to you, it is worth your time to get familiar with what it really means. Ivan Pavlov demonstrated a “conditioned response” in the dogs he used for experimentation. Some of these experiments were quite cruel and involved electric shocks to impair or elicit both involuntary physiological as well as behavioral responses. The act of shaming is actually a very similar paradigm, and it’s easy to imagine the one doing the shaming as having an electric shock button that they press to deliver a very uncomfortable at best, and excruciatingly painful at worst, emotional shock to the recipient’s consciousness. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Limiting Beliefs102 views0 answers0 votesShaming is not isolated to humans. An acquaintance has a five-year-old beagle who has an undesirable habit of urinating on the hardwood floor if not put outside on a timely basis. The dog has been trained entirely through rewards and only verbal shaming as punishment. But the effect of shaming can be quite profound. The dog knows that urinating inside the house is undesirable behavior and displeasing to the humans in the house, so the dog makes sure no one is watching when she goes. As an adult dog, she has never been caught in the act. One recent morning this acquaintance found the all too familiar puddle on the floor and turned to the dog right behind them, pointed to the puddle, and said, “No,” just, “No.” Not loud or even conveying much in the way of emotion, just enough to communicate displeasure. The response of the dog was rather extreme—tail between her legs and she wandered off to hide under the raised footrest of a recliner for a few minutes “until the coast was clear.” The acquaintance was a bit “taken aback” at the profound effect of a simple, “No.” This person does not shame the dog very often, and that may be one explanation for the exaggerated effect. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Limiting Beliefs149 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola