DWQA Questions › Tag: consciousnessFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesCreator said angels do not have a subconscious, and further told us: “They have one integrated way of perceiving things and are able to see a wider array of sources of information; they have a much larger knowledge base. The problem they have is that their beliefs become distorted through time because of conflicts they have with wanting to satisfy desires of the soul that might not be appropriate in the moment.” Is the angel the entirety of its soul or a soul extension, like with human beings? Does an angel experience desires of the soul as something originating outside of their ego, the way a human might, something they have but whose true origin remains a mystery?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Corruption206 views0 answers0 votesHow are people’s minds commandeered by extraterrestrials to give them an experience of being on an alien craft and other manipulations?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control254 views0 answers0 votesIs there something sinister in the abandonment of the Asperger’s diagnostic category by the psychologists?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Genetic Manipulations264 views0 answers0 votesDid the channeler [name withheld] actually talk with the deceased Las Vegas accused perpetrator, Stephen Paddock, in spirit form as well as other victims?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls174 views0 answers0 votesWas Stephen Paddock an undercover FBI agent involved in arms sales to ISIS here in the U.S? Was ISIS responsible for the Vegas attack?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control184 views0 answers0 votesBecause the plan appears to be that humanity is going to be turned over to the control of the alien Greys, is there some form of karmically acceptable tool we could use to create a weakening of the ability of the alien Greys to prey on us? What is their “kryptonite,” so to speak?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda249 views0 answers0 votesWon’t the unusual anatomical composition of alien Grey/human hybrids and human clones be revealed if an autopsy is conducted? If so, how will the Extraterrestrial Alliance deal with this?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Genetic Manipulations217 views0 answers0 votesIncluded in a skeptical article in the collection, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, was this VERY interesting reference, “Another recent study compared Theravada Buddhist Monks with lay novices … The authors found far more (brain) activity in the practiced monks than the novices during meditation, noting that the monks were able to dramatically self-regulate the activity of their frontoparietal and left insular areas.” This one statement dramatically undercuts the assertion that the brain controls ALL mental activity and not the other way around. Yet, it was nonchalantly included in an article whose agenda was to (quote) “Argue that the mind is located in the brain in such a way that there is no mental life after brain death … Our conclusion is overwhelmingly supported by neuroscientific evidence.” Yet they inexplicably include a neuroscientific case study that dramatically undercuts that conclusion. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness262 views0 answers0 votesIn an earlier show, Creator agreed with the statement, “You will learn more about reality by studying the extraordinary, than the ordinary.” Yet the ordinary is the focus of the skeptics in their attempts to prove that the paranormal is make-believe. In fact, skeptics have elevated this proclivity to have the force of law. In the volume, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, behavioral geneticist Jene Mercer writes, “The law of parsimony, a guiding rule for scientists for hundreds of years, states that given two equally well-supported explanations for a phenomena, we are best advised to choose the simpler one rather than multiplying entities unnecessarily.” Skeptics routinely “choose the simpler” by ignoring and throwing out exceptions and outliers in their data, all the while congratulating themselves for being scientific. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness206 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Cotard’s syndrome, or the delusional belief that you are dead, that you don’t exist, or that you have lost your organs or blood, results from damage to the channels of interaction between the fusiform face area and the limbic system.” What can Creator tell us about this? Are the researchers over-attributing causality to the brain damage alone? Would the same symptoms and delusions inevitably result in any person that suffered similar brain damage?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs215 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Research shows remarkable relationships between brain tumors and brain chemistry, on the one hand, and bizarre thoughts or behaviors, on the other. In one patient the onset of hypersexuality, obsession with pornography, and pedophilia paralleled the growth of a tumor in his right orbitofrontal lobe. When the tumor was removed, his urges lapsed. When the tumor grew back, his pedophilia returned.” What can Creator tell us about this tumor-to-behavior relationship?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs244 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Patients with no history of gambling find themselves overwhelmed with the urge to gamble when their dosages (of Parkinson’s drug pramipexole) cross a particular threshold, sometimes leading them to gamble away their life savings. But when the dosage is reduced, the urge vanishes.” Can Creator tell us what is REALLY going on here?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs231 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Even something as common as the effects of a cup of espresso show that those elements of consciousness alleged to survive biological death depend directly upon the brain.” This seems like missing the forest for the trees. Stimulus effects are conditions that arouse the “decision-maker” within, but they do not decide for her or him! Otherwise, it would be impossible to resist ANYTHING. And life calls for a great deal of discerning resistance! Is it safe to say that DECISION is a spiritual function, not a biological function? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs217 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Even rats are responsive to the pain of others, refusing to eat when their eating inflicts electric shocks on other rats.” He used this to argue that even morality is a product of evolution. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs257 views0 answers0 votesAtheist evolutionists have a tendency to showcase theory as fact. Matt McCormick wrote, “(Experts)… have now converged on the view that evolution favored hyperactive agency detection devices (HADD). The basic idea is there is survival benefit to detecting or attributing agency or intentionality to many things in our environment. ‘It is better to mistake a boulder for a bear, than a bear for a boulder.’ Mistaking too many things as conscious agents is a helpful error since detecting too few of them can be deadly.” McCormick speculates that this is why we are so quick to believe in brainless consciousness. We can’t help it. McCormick writes, “The prevailing view is that seeing manifestations of God’s conscious will, desires, and goals in the world is a byproduct of HADD.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs243 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola