DWQA Questions › Tag: conscious mindFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA practitioner asks: “Can the psychic intentions of some people’s dreams influence other people mentally? Is there a potential karmic danger there, even if they don’t realize what their dreams are doing?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness180 views0 answers0 votesTo what extent do post-hypnotic suggestions get stored in cellular memory as opposed to short-term or long-term memory?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind193 views0 answers0 votesTo what extent are post-hypnotic suggestions embraced by the deep subconscious, to be acted on?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind207 views0 answers0 votesIs the relative weakness of post-hypnotic suggestions also due to the fact that they do not necessarily become beliefs, or actually conflict with previously held beliefs and get discarded?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind148 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “I was impulsed to reach out to you and ask you what you feel about providing some type of direction for those that are starting to ramp up their dreaming without proper direction. People can “steer” their presence in the dreamscape, and this is never talked about at GetWisdom. Not really. Not the type of detail that could be not only instructional but incredibly beneficial. It occurred to me that if we’re going to go down that rabbit hole of asking the subconscious to work with dreams, the dreamer, in my opinion, should have some type of direction as to how to steer and navigate the dreams that are starting to manifest. Yes, that said, Creator knows best, and perhaps I’m reaching too far?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness164 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “My wish is that, at some point, people will be able to do their own Deep Subconscious Channeling with Holographic Memory Resolution (DSC-HMR), with intent, while dreaming. We have seen that this is doable, right?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Channeling203 views0 answers0 votesWhen reading material written by skeptics denying the existence of an afterlife, spirits, etc., their biggest agenda seems to be, “Do whatever it takes to avoid having to settle on a paranormal explanation for ANYTHING.” Why do these people have such a deep-seated aversion to the very notion of the paranormal? It’s almost as if the paranormal traumatizes them. Is that a valid insight? Could these people actually benefit from Deep Subconscious Trauma Resolution?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness246 views0 answers0 votesIncluded in a skeptical article in the collection, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, was this VERY interesting reference, “Another recent study compared Theravada Buddhist Monks with lay novices … The authors found far more (brain) activity in the practiced monks than the novices during meditation, noting that the monks were able to dramatically self-regulate the activity of their frontoparietal and left insular areas.” This one statement dramatically undercuts the assertion that the brain controls ALL mental activity and not the other way around. Yet, it was nonchalantly included in an article whose agenda was to (quote) “Argue that the mind is located in the brain in such a way that there is no mental life after brain death … Our conclusion is overwhelmingly supported by neuroscientific evidence.” Yet they inexplicably include a neuroscientific case study that dramatically undercuts that conclusion. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness262 views0 answers0 votesIn an earlier show, Creator agreed with the statement, “You will learn more about reality by studying the extraordinary, than the ordinary.” Yet the ordinary is the focus of the skeptics in their attempts to prove that the paranormal is make-believe. In fact, skeptics have elevated this proclivity to have the force of law. In the volume, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, behavioral geneticist Jene Mercer writes, “The law of parsimony, a guiding rule for scientists for hundreds of years, states that given two equally well-supported explanations for a phenomena, we are best advised to choose the simpler one rather than multiplying entities unnecessarily.” Skeptics routinely “choose the simpler” by ignoring and throwing out exceptions and outliers in their data, all the while congratulating themselves for being scientific. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness206 views0 answers0 votesActress Marilu Henner is one of less than a hundred people in the world with Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory. She can literally remember every detail of her life. But she doesn’t appear to “remember” the way most do. Her son once asked her after testing her memory, “You’ve never explained how you do that?” Her reply was, “I don’t DO it, I just SEE it.” Others equated it to having Google in your brain. Is her deep subconscious pulling everything out of the akashic records on demand, and presenting it to her visually? Is this ability granted as a “mission life” to simply be a non-threatening billboard for what’s possible? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness248 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, Tesla: Man Out of Time, by Margaret Cheney, she quoted Nikola Tesla, who talked about having, “A peculiar affliction due to the appearance of images, often accompanied by strong flashes of light, which marred the sight of real objects and interfered with my thought and action. They were pictures of things and scenes which I had really seen, never of those I imagined. When a word was spoken to me, the image of the object it designated would present itself vividly to my vision and sometimes I was quite unable to distinguish whether what I saw was tangible or not.” Cheney continues, “In the stillness of the night, the vivid picture of a funeral he had seen or some other disturbing scene would thrust itself before his eyes, so that even if he jabbed his hand through it, it would remain fixed in space.” What can Creator tell us about this ability of Tesla’s? Does Marilu Henner see her memories in a similar fashion?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness259 views0 answers0 votesCheney quotes Tesla about his amazing visualization ability, “My method is different … I do not rush into actual work. When I get an idea I start at once building it up in my imagination. I change the construction, make improvements and operate the device in my mind. It is absolutely immaterial to me whether I run my turbine in my thought or test it in my shop. I even note if it is out of balance.” Cheney writes, “He claimed he was able to perfect a conception without touching anything. Only when all the faults had been corrected in his brain, did he put the device into concrete form.” Most people cannot begin to relate to this kind of ability. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness224 views0 answers0 votesBrian made it through law school without taking notes. Not because he had a photographic memory, but because he couldn’t remember what the professor said long enough to write it down. Yet he made it through and passed the bar exam on his ability to intuit the law. He just seemed to grasp what the law was, correctly, for nearly any fact set presented. In his case, an unusual handicap was offset by an equally unusual analytical ability. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness240 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that Karl was Allan Kardec in a past life. In that life, he was a scholar of ordinary abilities, who studied extraordinary phenomena. In his current life, he retains all the skills of Kardec, but now is a medium himself instead of having to rely on others. Can Creator explain in more detail how Karl’s abilities are an upgrade from Kardec’s, and what was involved in bringing that about?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness311 views0 answers0 votesCheney wrote of Tesla, “The optic screen in his mind stored entire logarithmic tables to be called on as needed.” Brian struggled mightily with math, and failed to become a mechanical engineer himself, largely due to his excessively poor memory for detail—in contrast to Tesla’s optic screen. Brian tries to be philosophical and a good sport about this kind of disparity, but sometimes can’t help feeling a bit of chagrin about how UNFAIR it all seems at times. Most people have two hands and two feet. Why do most people NOT have an optic screen like Tesla? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness273 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola