DWQA Questions › Tag: conscious awarenessFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesErickson treated a couple of patients with an affective (wholly psychological) writing disorder. Neither could write but could do any number of other complex hand tasks like using tools or knitting. He was unable to treat one of the patients, but with the other, he used hypnosis to “transfer” the handicap to the other non writing hand. This finally enabled this patient to resume writing successfully, but with the effect that the other hand would go numb, every time they went to write something. So while this is difficult to label a “healing,” it is a creative workaround to the problem and was a great help to the patient. What was really happening here, why was Erickson successful with one, but not the other patient, and what is truly needed to heal such disorders?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind195 views0 answers0 votesErickson mentioned a little-known phenomenon to folks who don’t work in extremely loud industrial settings. For old-timers in these settings, it is not uncommon for two acclimated workers to be able to carry on a “normal” conversation, at normal volume levels, when outsiders can’t hear each other even when shouting in close proximity. How is this even possible? This appears to be a phenomenon almost akin to telepathy. It certainly seems to defy our understanding of hearing biology. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind214 views0 answers0 votesOne reason that science appears to eschew hypnosis is because the phenomenon is not 100% reproducible on demand. There is no such thing as a hypnotic induction technique that will work with every subject, every time. Erickson found that even with well-experienced subjects, he would sometimes have to alter his induction approach because they had developed what he called a ‘mind-set’ or intimate awareness of it, such that it was no longer effective. This was especially a problem with highly intelligent subjects. Ordinary science appears to have no patience for any of this. It appears to be more “art” than “science.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind202 views0 answers0 votesErickson never believed that some people cannot be hypnotized, and spent his life attempting to prove that. One student, in particular, required over 300 one-hour working sessions before he could develop a somnambulistic trance. Once that was achieved, he turned out to be an outstanding subject. Erickson also noted that most engineers are difficult to hypnotize. Something peculiar about engineers seems to make them exceedingly impatient with anyone even attempting to hypnotize them. The result was that during many of his studies, it was always the engineers that would quit on him, often en masse. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind254 views0 answers0 votesKarl began his healing career as a hypnotist. And it was certainly the mixed results he got with it that helped motivate him to explore subconscious healing beyond hypnosis—eventually resulting in the revelations of Empowered Prayer and The Lightworker Healing Protocol. Can Creator share with us the importance of that journey and its achievements?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind240 views0 answers0 votesTo what extent do post-hypnotic suggestions get stored in cellular memory as opposed to short-term or long-term memory?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind188 views0 answers0 votesTo what extent are post-hypnotic suggestions embraced by the deep subconscious, to be acted on?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind200 views0 answers0 votesIs the relative weakness of post-hypnotic suggestions also due to the fact that they do not necessarily become beliefs, or actually conflict with previously held beliefs and get discarded?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Mind143 views0 answers0 votesIs it possible to do healing work via subconscious channeling on Anunnaki, Reptilian, or Arcturian extraterrestrials without their conscious awareness, or is that capability unique for humans because of the deep subconscious disconnect imposed by Anunnaki tinkering with the human genome long ago?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Subconscious Channeling210 views0 answers0 votesIs Zecharia Sitchin largely wrong about what he claims about Anunnaki and their origins, and if so, was this a disinformation campaign?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers190 views0 answers0 votesIn a state of insanity where there is a fixation on particular delusions, does this utilize a mechanism similar to that behind mind control programming as done by psychic means to manipulate a person’s thoughts and actions?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control184 views0 answers0 votesArthur Guirdham wrote, “She (Mrs. Smith) said, that if she started remembering too much she ran a high temperature and developed a severe headache. I do not know about the high temperature but the headache is interesting and perfectly in order. A proportion of cases of migraine are attributable to psychic factors.” What can Creator tell us about this?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Reincarnation211 views0 answers0 votesArthur Guirdham wrote, “Certainly Catharism must have largely spread by example and emanation, but this is not really the whole story. How did it come that a creed that which seems, to many modern students, to have been austere and pessimistic spread with such rapidity? … One factor is, I think, consistently overlooked. In the Middle Ages, people were dominated by the fear of Hell. Catharism to some extent dissipated this fear … If this world is the worst Hell one has to put up with, it must have been, even at its lowest, vastly preferable to perpetual damnation of the Orthodox Christians of the epoch.” What can Creator tell us about the rapid spread and popularity of Catharism?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Reincarnation211 views0 answers0 votesArthur Guirdham wrote, “The inquisitors regarded the purity of the Parfaits (Cathar priests) as something to be used against them, believing that, because it was associated with heresy, it must necessarily be classified with hypocrisy. Evidence for the corruption of the Roman Church at the time is adequately provided by Pope Innocent III, who instigated the Great Crusade against the Albigensians but had no illusions about the failure of his own priests.” Then there is the irony of a pope with the name “Innocent” single-handedly being directly responsible for more overt and severe human suffering than arguably any other pope in the history of the Catholic Church—as evidenced by the unhealed trauma of Mrs. Smith eight centuries later. What can Creator tell us about the irony of his chosen name and the sincerity of his belief that God was truly on his side in announcing his horrific edict?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Reincarnation215 views0 answers0 votesPope Innocent III did some good things in life as pope. For instance, he granted Francis of Assisi permission to found his order. There is a story that on the day Pope Innocent III died he appeared to St. Lutgardis in Belgium. St. Lutgardis is considered to have been one of the great mystics of the 13th century. When Pope Innocent appeared to her, he thanked her for her prayers during his lifetime but explained that he was in trouble: He had not gone straight to heaven but was in purgatory, suffering its purifying fire for three specific faults he had committed during his life. He made a desperate plea for help: “Alas! It is terrible; and will last for centuries if you do not come to my assistance. In the name of Mary, who has obtained for me the favor of appealing to you, help me!” Then he vanished. With a sense of urgency, St. Lutgardis quickly told her fellow religious sisters what she had seen and prayed for his soul. Was Innocent successfully rescued? What can Creator tell us about this remarkable story?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Reincarnation222 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola