DWQA Questions › Tag: code words
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “The LHP asks for Creator to invite Gaia, the Sun, the solar system, and the rest of the free will galaxy to add their healing intentions to the LHP. Is there benefit to adding specificity in the form of requesting healing intentions from the consciousness of all Milky Way solar systems’ stars, black holes, dark matter, and sentient beings?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
84 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Can the healing intentions of the estimated 100 billion other galaxies also be requested and used for healing work?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
80 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us not to encourage use of code words to launch an LHP session. Yet, rare individuals may be preconfigured in the light to enable this. Is it acceptable to tell practitioners it is okay to set up a code word to launch both the LHP and DSMR, knowing that only in rare instances will the LHP get done? Where is the harm, assuming they are not wasting significant time and energy to try augmenting their spiritual reach?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
82 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner writes: “One of the downsides of the code word approach according to Creator was that it freezes in place the current level of competence through belief quotient and level of intention summoned during that pilot session, because that becomes the energy on record to be repurposed each and every time going forward. To counter this limitation, I devised a workaround by adding to our boilerplate the following request: ‘Link all my iterations of this prayer in all time domains to my code-word I designate as ________, so that each time I say this code-word, the entire prayer requests are made including their indefinite repetitions.'” Will it work for him as he describes, because he was pre-configured in the light to have such wherewithal?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
He writes: “So every live session we do will automatically charge our code word LHP boilerplate with fresh intentions to ensure our code word LHP will be up to date with our live sessions going onward as the practitioner grows and evolves with his/her depth of understanding, knowledge, and heartfelt intentions. From the get go our small group members were able to launch code word LHP sessions. At that time they had less experience than they have now. Furthermore, all their live sessions automatically charge their pilot sessions with fresh intentions.” Is he correct? Have the practitioners following his method been successful linking the intentions from all their sessions to code words?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
Please clarify the channeled answer you gave us about the overall healing achieved by the group of channelers attempting to emulate their leader who has an uncommon ability to launch LHP sessions with a code word. We asked, “How effective, on average, are members of this group in getting healing equivalent to live sessions?” And you told us: “We would say that the effectiveness, on average, is about 50% of what would be achieved were all those sessions done live…” Did this really mean to indicate that their code word sessions are still half as effective as live sessions, so that given they can launch hundreds of code words they accomplish far more than doing live sessions only? Or was the answer meant to convey that their total effort, the total healing output for the time expended, even though they might launch hundreds of code word sessions, ended up getting only 50% of what they could have accomplished just doing what live sessions they could for the same amount of time spent?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
136 views0 answers0 votes
Will code words grow in strength with reuse?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
157 views0 answers0 votes
Can a code word launching be added together with all other code word launches to gain further empowerment?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Would it be prudent for there to be a version of the LHP that only a few select people among the practitioner community are privy to, based on leadership role and dedication to the cause? I am asking this for two reasons: 1) security and 2) the recent blackout forecasting experience has demonstrated that some practitioners are of questionable faith and understanding, and might not be steadfast to the project long-term. Would keeping more exotic maneuverers away from all eyes be prudent and more effective for the greater good? Could this “limited” version be merged with the rest of the practitioner prayer pool by divine realm, so that other practitioners fuel the exotic maneuvers but without directly knowing about them? I’m thinking it would be sort of like when we harness all future protocol updates in the present, and send current updates into the past. Or does every part of the LHP have to be requested by all practitioners with full understanding of all tactics, in order for all requests to be effective and the protocol itself to work properly?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner made this recommendation: “Instead of fighting to squeeze in 90 minute chunks 1 to 3 times a week, completing 1 to 3 LHP/DSMRs, I now almost every morning carve out 30 minutes at least to start an LHP/DSMR session. Sometimes I’m able to finish, sometimes I wait until night, and sometimes I just have to resume next morning. I am able to get 3 to 6 sessions done this way a week versus fighting to find full time for 1 to 3 sessions. The way I do it is when I’m feeling I need to stop or am pressed for time, I’ll make note of my stop time, ask Creator to hold and link my next session, stop and ground with white light, and when I resume I again say the protection prayer, requesting, “Creator, link this session to my previous one,” and then begin where I left off. What is Creator’s perspective? Will this be just as effective? Are there any precautions you would recommend or reservations to note?”
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
266 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “I usually finger test to see if anyone from the obituary section of the paper needs help transitioning to the light. For over a week now, there hasn’t been anyone needing help transitioning. Since 30% of people who have died need help transitioning, Creator, can you tell me what is going on?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
177 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “I walk my dog on long walks every day in the forest preserve. I was wondering if I could listen to the LHP and DSMR protocols on my walk and if that would be as effective?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “After the LHP intention pool is repurposed does it drain away and need topping up?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “If client targets are worked on by subgroups, how do we eventually reach the entire intended target? This is in relation to the LHP, ‘Conduct all these sessions on subgroups of these targets as appropriate, considering their level of need, to stay within my energetic reach.'” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
177 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “What are Creator’s thoughts on those who have the means taking an “LHP vacation,” to get away for a few days or weeks and take a break from daily obligations, and focus on being more present and in a high vibration state to do sessions?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
171 views0 answers0 votes
123Next »