DWQA Questions › Tag: bioweaponFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “With so much conflicting information about COVID and vaccinations, I’ve become so unsure how to recognize what is truth and what is misinformation. Is it beneficial to my health to take the vaccine or will it create greater health or societal problems in the future? Is the risk of not receiving the COVID vaccination greater or more problematic than the risks of getting it?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19473 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “Dr. Richard Fleming is a Physicist and Nuclear Cardiologist. He first presented in 1994 a theory to the American Heart Association why people with the SARS-CoV-2 virus could manifest an inflammo-thrombotic disease – we now know as COVID-19. This theory of inflammation and heart disease accounts for why people with comorbidities were dying of COVID-19 – because they weren’t being treated for these known effects.” Is this the case, or only part of the story?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19326 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “He said this is not a naturally occurring virus (we know) and he followed the trails leading to the Gain-of-Function work, where the money came from, who funded it, etc. The spike protein contains human genome sequences inserted into the spike protein, and that this spike protein is doing EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO, which is to increase infection and create inflammation and blood clots.” Is this all true?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19391 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “He said the vaccines actually have components in them to DISSOLVE blood clots, indicating that this was a known effect.” Is this true?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19362 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “When the coronavirus was simply being transmitted person to person, it was only people with increased vulnerability due to comorbidities, such as diabetes and heart disease, that were having issues with inflammation and blood clots, which they were NOT being treated for. Now with the vaccine, the body is being turned into a spike protein-producing factory, and so people with otherwise healthy immune systems are now having inflammo-thrombotic issues. This is why we’re seeing the deaths he says.” Is this true? Are the vaccines causing deaths through this mechanism? If so, what is the incidence?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19387 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “He studied the FDA’s own EUA documents, and using THEIR data submitted to them by the vaccine-making pharmaceutical companies, he concluded that THERE WAS NO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE that any of the vaccines slow the spread of COVID-19. This was not HIS data, but EUA data provided by the vaccine manufacturers to the FDA. NO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE that these vaccines slowed the spread of infection. The media is saying there is 96% “efficacy.” But really what they’re saying, he says, is that 96% won’t have immediate side effects from the vaccines!!! That’s what the mainstream media is pushing as efficacy!” Is this correct?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19345 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “When you ask the question, BUT DOES THE VACCINE “**PROTECT**” ME??? He says the answer is NO. And their own data demonstrates this. The infection RATE of both the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations after two weeks to 28 days SHOW NO STATISTICAL DIFFERENCE, and again, that conclusion is based on data provided by the vaccine manufacturers themselves.” Is this correct?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19358 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “Now, this is where it gets important. The spike protein is not natural, it is GAIN-OF-FUNCTION artificially produced. IT IS CROSSING THE BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER. In animals, especially humanized mice, they develop spongiform encephalopathy, which is MAD COW DISEASE. In the rhesus macaque models, that about two weeks afterwards, they developed Lewy bodies in the brain that cause Alzheimer’s and other neurologic disorders. AND THOSE NUMBERS TRANSLATE INTO ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF FOR HUMAN BEINGS TO SEE THOSE SAME CONSEQUENCES.” What is the divine perspective on Dr. Fleming’s revelations?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19333 views0 answers0 votesWill enhancement of general NK cell antiviral activity be a superior approach to protection from coronaviruses and their variants?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19309 views0 answers0 votesBarbara Marciniak channelings of the Pleiadians have been predicting for 3 years now that the REAL and extremely deadly pandemic hits humanity in 2022. Is that still planned? Will it be because of the use of inappropriate vaccines to cause propagation of super-potent viral mutants?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19583 views0 answers0 votesThere have been prominent announcements from the FDA about the inadvisability and dangers of people using ivermectin to treat COVID-19. Caution about taking pill formulations intended for large animals by humans is understandable, but this seems to have the same feel as the trashing of hydroxychloroquine early and often by the medical establishment exaggeration of possible side effects and even alteration of the data in clinical trials to make it falsely look both ineffective and highly toxic. Is that planned or underway to deliberately undercut further studies of ivermectin?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19339 views0 answers0 votesWill further clinical studies of fluvoxamine in patients with COVID-19 be suppressed by the US medical establishment as they have done for hydroxychloroquine?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19290 views0 answers0 votesIn a preliminary study of adult outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19, patients treated with fluvoxamine, compared with placebo, had a lower likelihood of clinical deterioration. There was clinical deterioration in 0 of 80 patients in the fluvoxamine group and in 6 of 72 patients in the placebo group (absolute difference, 8.7% [95% CI, 1.8%-16.4%] from survival analysis; log-rank P = .009). The fluvoxamine group had 1 serious adverse event and 11 other adverse events, whereas the placebo group had 6 serious adverse events and 12 other adverse events. Is this a worthwhile agent for COVID-19 management? How would it compare with hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19291 views0 answers0 votesAn osteopathic physician and frequent spokesperson on the Internet says there are at least 10 ways that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines can cause serious side effects in human recipients. Is this the case, or an exaggeration? Why is she beating this drum?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19500 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Can creator comment on the new Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine? This one does not use mRNA tech.” How safe and effective is this vaccine? Is it better to use this approach for reasons of better safety in not using the mRNA technology of other vaccines?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19563 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola