DWQA Questions › Tag: belief quotientFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThe remaining roles would be researcher, typical occupations being anything scholarly. One source said something to the effect, that only the “researcher” type of person could spend an entire lifetime studying the mating habits of an African beetle. A helper type would never be able to do that without going crazy. The remaining three types are the orator type, with journalist being a principal occupation, the spiritual type, with anything involving religious and/or inspirational leadership and devout following being center stage, and finally the “chief” type. The “chiefs” are souls that are always focused on the BIG picture and gravitate to roles and occupations that impact large numbers of people. It is assumed that chiefs make up the smallest percentage, as low as 2% of all humanity. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Human Potential162 views0 answers0 votesSo if we were to assume that each human is typically and primarily one of those roles, that would narrow the expected behavior of such a person substantially. So while it would certainly not be impossible for a helper type to become President of the United States, you wouldn’t expect it. Nor would you expect an orator type to pursue mechanical engineering as an occupation. If they did, you would likely find them becoming the editor of an engineering periodical, rather than burying themselves all day in blueprints. So while these primary attributes don’t create HARD boundaries that prevent individuals from doing anything they want, they do, in fact, help mold and define those very WANTS to begin with. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Human Potential109 views0 answers0 votesThis is a mere introduction to the topic of soul attributes, and we will explore soul attribute expressions in a future episode. Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, and Deep Subconscious Memory Reset Protocol along with Divine Life Support are the means by which Soul Attribute problems and negative issues of all kinds are best resolved?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Human Potential109 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Is there perhaps a tension between initiating LHP healing sessions that allow the divine realm to heal things so that life can become more fulfilling with reduced karmic hindrances and obstacles, versus taking action despite karmic burdens to improve one’s life? What is the wisest balance?”ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma121 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “I remember you saying that you have a dog. I have a dog and my dog has been receiving LHP for four years now and also the recent DSMR protocol. My dog seems to have allergies, licking paws, butt, and legs, scooting his butt, ear itching. I can’t seem to get rid of it. My last option now is to put him on a human made diet, but it seems time consuming to have to go buy food and prepare it at home etc. It’s a very common problem for dogs, I was wondering if you have any information on why so many dogs have these issues. I didn’t see anything in the database on this issue that’s why I’m asking, I was thinking perhaps your dog has this problem. I don’t know. I’m going to try the home made diet. It’s organ meat (chicken liver and hearts) sweet potatoes, pumpkin, carrots and quinoa and see how it goes. Not sure if that will help, because I’m assuming it’s karmic otherwise, it would be gone by now with the LHP and DSMR. If you know of anything that could help like supplements, or specific diets, please let me know. Thank you.” What is most important to know about this and how can we help?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Animal Issues152 views0 answers0 votesPlease clarify the channeled answer you gave us about the overall healing achieved by the group of channelers attempting to emulate their leader who has an uncommon ability to launch LHP sessions with a code word. We asked, “How effective, on average, are members of this group in getting healing equivalent to live sessions?” And you told us: “We would say that the effectiveness, on average, is about 50% of what would be achieved were all those sessions done live…” Did this really mean to indicate that their code word sessions are still half as effective as live sessions, so that given they can launch hundreds of code words they accomplish far more than doing live sessions only? Or was the answer meant to convey that their total effort, the total healing output for the time expended, even though they might launch hundreds of code word sessions, ended up getting only 50% of what they could have accomplished just doing what live sessions they could for the same amount of time spent?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol173 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner writes: “This question is about souls being lost to oblivion or “recycled” if they are beings who are caught in the trap of evil and eventually their soul dies. My theory is this: That if humanity ascends or at some point some event like that occurs, whether it is with humanity now or a new universe trillions of years in the future, either way, it is likely to occur at some point, then that means a greater healing of the galaxy and universe can begin to take place, like the healing of humanity’s perpetrators, for instance. So when this kind of broader healing begins to happen it not only heals in the Now but heals through all of time. To humans time is linear, but in reality time is spherical. So when this greater healing starts to occur, healing in the past occurs as well, meaning that souls who were lost to oblivion can be healed in the past where they still exist, thus preventing the death of their souls. The underlying theme being that “All that has been done can be undone,” and that “There are truly no problems.” That being said, it does not take away from the gravity of the situation we all face, but it does show that because time can be healed, that all wrongs can and will be righted. Source Creator, does this concept hold water?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Healing245 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Would it be prudent for there to be a version of the LHP that only a few select people among the practitioner community are privy to, based on leadership role and dedication to the cause? I am asking this for two reasons: 1) security and 2) the recent blackout forecasting experience has demonstrated that some practitioners are of questionable faith and understanding, and might not be steadfast to the project long-term. Would keeping more exotic maneuverers away from all eyes be prudent and more effective for the greater good? Could this “limited” version be merged with the rest of the practitioner prayer pool by divine realm, so that other practitioners fuel the exotic maneuvers but without directly knowing about them? I’m thinking it would be sort of like when we harness all future protocol updates in the present, and send current updates into the past. Or does every part of the LHP have to be requested by all practitioners with full understanding of all tactics, in order for all requests to be effective and the protocol itself to work properly?”ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol131 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I was playing paddle this morning. I forgot to say my prayers but try to every morning. Paddle is very intense because the ball is very hard. I always am concerned about being hit in the face and typically pray for protection when playing. The ball was driven to me this morning and ricocheted off my paddle into my right eye. Fortunately my eye is ok. Just a black eye. I thought later how much worse it could have been and wondered if I was being protected despite the injury. Just curious. Maybe it was just luck. Maybe something else.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Prayer142 views0 answers0 votesArriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma173 views0 answers0 votesWe know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma131 views0 answers0 votesThe Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma119 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma154 views0 answers0 votesWe know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma166 views0 answers0 votesWe know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma106 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola