DWQA Questions › Tag: belief quotientFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA practitioner asks: “Is there perhaps a tension between initiating LHP healing sessions that allow the divine realm to heal things so that life can become more fulfilling with reduced karmic hindrances and obstacles, versus taking action despite karmic burdens to improve one’s life? What is the wisest balance?”ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma105 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “I remember you saying that you have a dog. I have a dog and my dog has been receiving LHP for four years now and also the recent DSMR protocol. My dog seems to have allergies, licking paws, butt, and legs, scooting his butt, ear itching. I can’t seem to get rid of it. My last option now is to put him on a human made diet, but it seems time consuming to have to go buy food and prepare it at home etc. It’s a very common problem for dogs, I was wondering if you have any information on why so many dogs have these issues. I didn’t see anything in the database on this issue that’s why I’m asking, I was thinking perhaps your dog has this problem. I don’t know. I’m going to try the home made diet. It’s organ meat (chicken liver and hearts) sweet potatoes, pumpkin, carrots and quinoa and see how it goes. Not sure if that will help, because I’m assuming it’s karmic otherwise, it would be gone by now with the LHP and DSMR. If you know of anything that could help like supplements, or specific diets, please let me know. Thank you.” What is most important to know about this and how can we help?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Animal Issues119 views0 answers0 votesPlease clarify the channeled answer you gave us about the overall healing achieved by the group of channelers attempting to emulate their leader who has an uncommon ability to launch LHP sessions with a code word. We asked, “How effective, on average, are members of this group in getting healing equivalent to live sessions?” And you told us: “We would say that the effectiveness, on average, is about 50% of what would be achieved were all those sessions done live…” Did this really mean to indicate that their code word sessions are still half as effective as live sessions, so that given they can launch hundreds of code words they accomplish far more than doing live sessions only? Or was the answer meant to convey that their total effort, the total healing output for the time expended, even though they might launch hundreds of code word sessions, ended up getting only 50% of what they could have accomplished just doing what live sessions they could for the same amount of time spent?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol137 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner writes: “This question is about souls being lost to oblivion or “recycled” if they are beings who are caught in the trap of evil and eventually their soul dies. My theory is this: That if humanity ascends or at some point some event like that occurs, whether it is with humanity now or a new universe trillions of years in the future, either way, it is likely to occur at some point, then that means a greater healing of the galaxy and universe can begin to take place, like the healing of humanity’s perpetrators, for instance. So when this kind of broader healing begins to happen it not only heals in the Now but heals through all of time. To humans time is linear, but in reality time is spherical. So when this greater healing starts to occur, healing in the past occurs as well, meaning that souls who were lost to oblivion can be healed in the past where they still exist, thus preventing the death of their souls. The underlying theme being that “All that has been done can be undone,” and that “There are truly no problems.” That being said, it does not take away from the gravity of the situation we all face, but it does show that because time can be healed, that all wrongs can and will be righted. Source Creator, does this concept hold water?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Healing180 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Would it be prudent for there to be a version of the LHP that only a few select people among the practitioner community are privy to, based on leadership role and dedication to the cause? I am asking this for two reasons: 1) security and 2) the recent blackout forecasting experience has demonstrated that some practitioners are of questionable faith and understanding, and might not be steadfast to the project long-term. Would keeping more exotic maneuverers away from all eyes be prudent and more effective for the greater good? Could this “limited” version be merged with the rest of the practitioner prayer pool by divine realm, so that other practitioners fuel the exotic maneuvers but without directly knowing about them? I’m thinking it would be sort of like when we harness all future protocol updates in the present, and send current updates into the past. Or does every part of the LHP have to be requested by all practitioners with full understanding of all tactics, in order for all requests to be effective and the protocol itself to work properly?”ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol113 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I was playing paddle this morning. I forgot to say my prayers but try to every morning. Paddle is very intense because the ball is very hard. I always am concerned about being hit in the face and typically pray for protection when playing. The ball was driven to me this morning and ricocheted off my paddle into my right eye. Fortunately my eye is ok. Just a black eye. I thought later how much worse it could have been and wondered if I was being protected despite the injury. Just curious. Maybe it was just luck. Maybe something else.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Prayer116 views0 answers0 votesArriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma127 views0 answers0 votesWe know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma113 views0 answers0 votesThe Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma93 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma121 views0 answers0 votesWe know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma128 views0 answers0 votesWe know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma90 views0 answers0 votesThere is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma67 views0 answers0 votesCreator is concerned with the spiritual growth of the individual (and even species) but karma looks geared to not be at all concerned with that agenda. Rather, it simply responds to energy perturbations in a literal tit-for-tat fashion. Karma is not concerned either, about a mission life underway; and if there is an opportunity to introduce a karmic response, it will simply do so in a kind of mechanical, automatic way. Does any cancellation or attenuation necessitate a divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma84 views0 answers0 votesThere is the karmic problem of returning a response to a perpetrator with a dramatically different makeup from the initial victim triggering the karmic debt. For instance, the same shove delivered to one individual is an annoyance but breaks the bones of someone frail. How would this debt be handled? Does karma wait for the perpetrator to be born frail? But even if frail, a psychopathic personality might absorb such a shove very differently than the initial victim, even if the broken bones are the same or similar. Then there is the dilemma of the first victim having a karmic recurrence of the shove themselves. So do we have both the perpetrator and victim getting the SAME karmic response? OR does the perpetrator simply return as another perpetrator and the victim as well, to again be a victim? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma75 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola