DWQA Questions › Tag: atheism
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “Poets have often been regarded as having insight and intuition beyond most people’s reach. For example, the English poet Matthew Arnold (1822 –1888) finishes one of his poems: ‘Resolve to be thyself; and know that he, Who finds himself, loses his misery!’ This would seem to be what GetWisdom would call “coming into divine alignment and healing to a point of ascension.” To what extent can poetry, music, literature, and the arts generally achieve healing? Is their use hindered and discouraged by dark forces? Are the arts an overlooked method of healing in society compared to medical science?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
One of the problems atheists have with the entire notion of creation is the apparent unfairness of it all. Why does Mozart get to be Mozart, while a clumsy and inept scullery maid can barely make herself useful? This gets at the whole notion of “Gifts from God.” What could be more fundamentally unfair than God seemingly handing out gifts of wildly differing value, arbitrarily, and some would argue capriciously? Even if we accept the reality of reincarnation, in light of these attribute revelations, most of us will NEVER be Mozart. Instead of “gift” would it be helpful to think in terms of attributes being “assignments” and not so much for the benefit of the individual, but for the fundamental and diverse requirements of humanity and its necessary functioning as a physical species? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • 
129 views0 answers0 votes
The human need for helpers is almost inexhaustible. The daily grind of life necessitates that countless mundane roles and jobs get done in order for society to function at all. The family, as a microcosm of society, has the same non-negotiable needs that are not glamorous or exciting. Humanity NEEDS a significant cadre, a significant large percentage of its population to be engaged in meeting these needs at all times. If no one could ever find satisfaction and fulfillment in meeting these drab but all-important requirements, society could simply not function at all. It appears the advent of the helper type was dictated by imperative need. As a result, there are likely more helpers than any other role. It appears nearly one-third of all humanity are helpers. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • 
74 views0 answers0 votes
The role of mother is more akin to the role of helper than any other attribute type. Though all souls will experience motherhood, frequently and profoundly, the nurturing role of mother is particularly suited to the helper type. Therefore it would make sense that helpers would prefer to be female more often than not. This would help to explain perhaps why the female gender, as a whole, so closely resembles the helper type as a whole. The two roles are profoundly reinforcing of each other. If the majority (or significant percentage) of women are helpers, and the majority (or significant percentage) of helpers are women, that would really help to make sense of what seems to be readily observable. It seems helpers would make awesome grandmothers. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • 
75 views0 answers0 votes
It was mentioned in the last show on soul attributes, that it’s not the attribute itself that is problematic, but how it is expressed. In evaluating the helper, it’s easy to see how their focus on the welfare of those around them can manifest in a positive way. But how can it manifest negatively? How can a helper be corrupted and even engage in and become “evil,” perhaps by imposing their more conservative standards and risk-aversion on others forcefully, such as the overbearing mother who limits the freedom of her children to a stultifying degree, to keep them safe, or perhaps in trying to manipulate others by performing unrequested and unneeded tasks in order to ingratiate, and then claiming “they had no choice” when confronted? Is the helper prone to being a martyr, working themselves to death, and then complaining about it incessantly? Were helpers more often than not the dreaded snitches in World War II sending “dangerous enemies” to the government for help? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • 
80 views0 answers0 votes
Is there truth to the speculation that problems blamed on viruses are not really due to viruses at all, but some other kind of alien technology?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
132 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer writes: “This is a video showing that no one has EVER proved the existence of ANY virus. There are many MDs who are having the same doubts. I believe that the ETs are poisoning us with something, but it is not viruses. https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/no-virus-is-international/.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
130 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer says: “If no one has EVER proved the existence of ANY virus, consequently, there are no vaccines for “viruses” that can be beneficial. I believe that all vaccines are sinister inventions, possibly inadvertent, but nonetheless sinister.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
122 views0 answers0 votes
Arriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
We know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
The Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
90 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
115 views0 answers0 votes
We know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
122 views0 answers0 votes
We know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
87 views0 answers0 votes
There is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123456…35Next »