DWQA Questions › Tag: angry GodFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesTiahuanaco, on Lake Titicaca in Bolivia, is a village known throughout the world for its mysterious Gate of the Sun, ruins of temples, and its pyramid. It also contains mysterious “H” stones with a mysterious organic-mineral geopolymer matrix. From Wikipedia, “The giant blocks of red sandstone raise another problem. Sandstone is a sedimentary rock composed of quartz grains and a clay binder. There are several possible geological sources but none correspond to the stones of the archaeological monuments. No known quarry is able to provide massive blocks of 10 meters long. In addition, the local stone is friable and small in size. Scientists have discovered under the electron microscope that the red sandstone of Pumapunku cannot come from the region because it contains elements, such as sodium carbonate, not found in the local geology.” Can Creator tell us approximately when Tiahuanaco was built (Pre-flood or Post-flood?), what was its purpose, and who built and used it? Why was it eventually abandoned?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers290 views0 answers0 votesThe Nazca Lines are a group of geoglyphs made in the soil of the Nazca Desert in Southern Peru. Most lines run straight across the landscape, but there are also figurative designs of animals and plants. The combined length of all the lines is over 1,300 km (800 mi), and the group covers an area of about 50 km. The figures vary in complexity. Hundreds are simple lines and geometric shapes; more than 70 are zoomorphic designs, including a hummingbird, spider, fish, condor, heron, monkey, lizard, dog, cat, and human. Other shapes include trees and flowers. Scholars differ in interpreting the purpose of the designs, but in general they ascribe religious significance to them. Can Creator tell us approximately when these were built, what were their purpose, and who built them? Are these perhaps a more permanent type of “crop circle?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers431 views0 answers0 votesMachu Picchu is an Inca citadel located in the Eastern Cordillera of Southern Peru on an eight-thousand-foot mountain ridge. Hiram Bingham roamed South America in the early 1900s and is credited with rediscovering Machu Picchu in 1911. He relates the following: “The modern Peruvians are very fond of speculating as to the method which the Incas employed to make their stones fit so perfectly. One of the favorite stories is that the Incas knew of a plant whose juices rendered the surface of a block so soft that the marvelous fitting was accomplished by rubbing the stones together for a few moments with this magical plant juice!” Can Creator tell us approximately when it was built (hundreds or thousands of years ago), what was its purpose, and who built and used it? Was it simply a make-work project to create a labor-intensive structure in such an inhospitable place?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers277 views0 answers0 votesMoai, meaning “statue” in Rapa Nui, the language of the native inhabitants, are monolithic humanoid figures on Easter Island, in Eastern Polynesia, 2,182 miles off the West Coast of Chile. Can Creator tell us approximately when these were built, what was their purpose, and who built them? Was Easter Island as isolated then as it is now? Was human slave labor involved? Was it overseen and managed by Extraterrestrials directly, and/or were ET/human hybrids (the Nephilim) involved? Was this simply a make-work project for the amusement of the Extraterrestrial Alliance?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers301 views0 answers0 votesThe Ancient Aliens TV show has detailed many megalithic ruins in promoting the thesis that extraterrestrials have visited Earth and left their mark. This would seem to be a very narrow focus, given the abundant evidence the ETs are still here, and perhaps have never left. If so, doesn’t the fact the extraterrestrials have never come forward to help us show they are not benevolent? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers291 views0 answers0 votesBuffalo Bill Cody wrote in his autobiography, “While we were in the sand hills, scouting the Niobrara country, the Pawnee Indians brought into camp some very large bones, one of which the surgeon of the expedition pronounced to be the thigh bone of a human being. The Indians said the bones were those of a race of people who long ago had lived in that country. They said these people were three times the size of a man of the present day, that they were so swift and strong that they could run by the side of a buffalo, and, taking the animal in one arm, could tear off a leg and eat it as they ran. These giants, said the Indians, denied the existence of a Great Spirit. When they heard the thunder or saw the lightning, they laughed and declared that they were greater than either.” Is this solid testimonial evidence, that the Anunnaki indeed are atheists, just as Creator has told us many, many times? Could these giants really run with the buffalo as depicted? What more can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers282 views0 answers0 votesIn Southern Illinois, across the Mississippi River from St. Louis, Missouri, are many enigmatic megalithic earthworks in Cahokia, Illinois. According to the website, cahokiamounds.org, Cahokia was once one of the greatest cities in the entire world, once boasting a population larger than the City of London in AD 1250. The site contains the enigmatic “Monks Mound” earthwork which is a mammoth earth platform ten stories high. If this was built with slave labor carrying baskets of material, it would have taken decades or even hundreds of years to complete. Most Americans have never heard of Cahokia, and even many, if not most people, living in Illinois have never heard of it, even though it is literally in their backyard, so to speak. These mounds often contain, or had nearby, burials of giant skeletons. Were these giants the sole inhabitants, or were they the rulers? Were these Nephilim (Anunnaki/human hybrids) who, while ostensibly higher on the importance totem pole, nevertheless were never allowed to fully join Anunnaki society, and so were relegated to live low-tech lives in the same geographical regions as humans, and having to live off the land and by their wits as humans did throughout history?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers286 views0 answers0 votesThe fact humanity has so much history utterly lost to most of us, suggests something sinister is responsible. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol will bring about the healing needed to resolve the “real problem” behind our lost and forgotten history, and perhaps eventually even restore knowledge of that history in great detail?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers394 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “The story of the Book of Exodus said that Moses stretched out his hand across the Red Sea and the Lord sent a wind to part it into a wall on either side to allow the people of Israel to pass through. It goes on to say that the Lord allowed them to pass through on dry land, but then that Moses should pass his hand again so that the Egyptians would be consumed by the sea. Is this really what happened, and if so, was it you, Creator, who performed this miracle? I don’t understand the wrath involved here being from a loving God.”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Religions486 views0 answers0 votesWe think of inner corruption as being impairment of moral principle, virtue, or values. Since it is assumed that no being is created “corrupt,” then inner corruption is somehow an acquired state of existence. Can Creator weigh in on this definition, as well as address the concept of “original sin” in terms of our spiritual origins as beings?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption530 views0 answers0 votesWhile it is assumed no being is created in a state of corruption, clearly some individual beings or souls appear more susceptible to inner mental corruption than others. Because who and what we are as newly created consciousness at the birth of our souls is endowed and not chosen, it seems unfair that some would have greater vulnerability than others. Is there any truth to this supposition, or are all equally vulnerable to inner corruption?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption390 views0 answers0 votesRare is the human mind that is not chaotic and stressful, at least some of the time. There is an assumption that one’s mind is one’s own, but if we’ve learned anything in this project, it’s that the human mind is anything but isolated and subject only to influences arriving from the five senses. People may think that is the case, but the reality is dramatically different. Can Creator comment on this notion of the mind being one’s own and how much of it shaped from influences other than the five senses?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption392 views0 answers0 votesOne of the hallmark traits of the corrupted soul is the enigmatic belief in their entitlement, that Creator, the universe, or the poor soul they are manipulating owes them something, if only as a proxy to the truly responsible party causing them harm. Can Creator comment on where in Hades they got this idea?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption412 views0 answers0 votesAnother seeming belief that the corrupted possess is the idea that their suffering is somehow license or currency that excuses their abuse of others. The flaw in their thinking is that in the real world, currency has universal value to everyone, but NO ONE wants someone else’s suffering in trade for anything. Where does this completely illogical notion come from?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption348 views0 answers0 votesAnother false belief of many corrupted souls is that they are already damned and irredeemable. They appear to honestly believe they have no future, or a desirable future in any sense, so their motto seems to become “eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die.” They seem to believe that one can only become damned once, and having crossed that threshold, they have nothing more to lose, and may find it oddly liberating. Can Creator comment on whether this is not only wrong, but a tragically foolhardy notion?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption337 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola