DWQA Questions › Tag: acceptance
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “I do find it very hard to determine whether my dog feels aggressive or not to another one because they are not showing much body language that I can discern, except interest. Then there will be either acceptance or sometimes aggression. It’s very hit and miss and I’m hoping there’s a better way.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
82 views0 answers0 votes
There is much talk about a group of a dozen or so people with bizarre suicides, for example, hanging themselves from doorknobs with neckties. Is this orchestrated to happen by the Extraterrestrial Alliance using mind control manipulation?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
166 views0 answers0 votes
Human beings are social creatures. Being accepted by the people you respect is important for nearly everybody. Solitary confinement is widely regarded as one of the worst forms of punishment there is. Can Creator comment on this human need for acceptance, and how that works as a powerful, if not overwhelming, need to be part of a consensus?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
375 views0 answers0 votes
Do the interlopers consider this need for peer acceptance a weakness?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
444 views0 answers0 votes
People don’t have a need to simply be part of a consensus, but to be part of the “right” or “correct” consensus. A friend of a GetWisdom founder confessed recently that the recent election of a particularly controversial politician was one of the most stressful things that ever happened to him. This seems an extraordinary thing for a man in his mid-fifties to confess. Clearly, he wants to be a member of the “right” consensus, but when politics is split almost evenly down the middle, determining which consensus is the “correct” one, is no longer obvious. Is this an accurate way to try and understand his dilemma and angst?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
356 views0 answers0 votes
How much does past life trauma stemming from being a member of the wrong consensus, play into people’s current perceived need to be in the “right” one today? The right one being the “safest” one, perhaps?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
361 views0 answers0 votes
One of the most maddening things for independent thinkers to put up with is the widespread tendency for people to first vet the source of recommended information before deciding whether they will even look at the new information or not. This can get downright comical when people will refuse to click on a link to a “questionable” website, that is in fact a link to a story on another site they actually approve of, or appears to support something they believe. Can Creator share why this seems like “enlightened” behavior to these people?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
333 views0 answers0 votes
Airplane pilots need to know which way the wind is blowing before attempting a takeoff. To do this, they will lick their finger and stick it into the air. This same kind of “check,” to see which way the “right consensus” is thinking, is observed almost everywhere. Another analogy would be to think of people walking around with a mini satellite dish on their head, that is connected 24-7 to their consensus database, like social media or a particular news outlet, so they’re never confused about what is “safe” information and what is “dangerous” information? What is Creator’s perspective of these analogies?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
361 views0 answers0 votes
It has been observed that many people genuinely fear information that has been deemed by their consensus to be dangerous, to the extent that they risk exile and banishment (or worse) if they even reveal that they know something they shouldn’t. Not unlike discovering that the car you’re driving is a stolen one, or that you are a carrier of a deadly virus. But the dilemma is, once you are exposed to information, it is very difficult to unsee it, and so people go to great lengths to avoid being exposed if they can help it. This creates some remarkable “gymnastics” at times. Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
351 views0 answers0 votes
Placing one’s full allegiance with a consensus, and making consensus approval their top criterion for conducting their lives means that consensus acceptance can be more important than facts or truth—to the extreme extent of people not believing their own eyes, or ignoring fundamental standards of fairness and decency they learned at age five. Can Creator share the karmic hazards of living this way?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
346 views0 answers0 votes
It would seem that one of the core operating principles of effective mind control manipulation is to win people’s obedience to a consensus, by simply controlling the content of that consensus. Controlling the content of a consensus can frequently be done with simple, repeated propaganda. And yet, so few people seem to recognize just how easily a consensus can be socially engineered and manipulated. They are certainly made aware this happens, especially when it’s pointed out to them in an obvious way. Yet they continue to resist. How much stress does shutting out this awareness cause, and how damaging can it be?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
440 views0 answers0 votes
Gaining wisdom would seem to be the proper way to graduate from consensus thinking—knowing the truth but having enough awareness that putting it on full display can be hazardous to one’s health. Can Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help every human obtain that wisdom in the least painful and traumatic way possible?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
423 views0 answers0 votes
She continues: “Also, I felt a lot of clearing in my space energetically but still experience moments of impatience with my ego/identity complex. I’m now recognizing the voice of the ego having a slightly different feel and timbre than the “outside” energies that I have struggled with throughout life. Would this be a correct assessment?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
272 views0 answers0 votes
There was a young man in his youth who suffered more than his fair share of tragedy. He had two siblings die in childhood, and a third disappear after running away and becoming homeless. He lived at home with his parents well into his middle-aged adulthood and worked a modest low-paying job as a hospital orderly. Yet, he saved enough money to buy a new high-end muscle car that was a favorite with collectors. The enigmatic thing was that he would spend up to two hours every day washing and detailing the vehicle. Can Creator share what purpose this behavior served for this individual, as the car certainly did not require daily washing?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
318 views0 answers0 votes
How much do people equate consensus with safety? How much do tragic events in past lives contribute to an overwhelming need to seek acceptance from a majority or powerful minority?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
341 views0 answers0 votes
12Next »
Ask Question