DWQA Questions › Tag: academic gatekeeping
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A friend of mine in the 1980s told me she had learned that Sutphen was kidnapped by federal authorities and flown to an east coast facility for interrogation. They asked him what he thought he was doing, and he said, “Teaching people how to think.” They told him to stop if he knew what was good for him. “We think for them,” he was reputedly told. In his last book, Sutphen said this only, “My heroes were all willing to speak out and act in response to what they believed. They have certainly influenced the way I communicate. They got me into trouble with the establishment on many occasions.” Was he hinting about what my friend shared with me? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
202 views0 answers0 votes
Sutphen’s last book, his memoir of 80 years, was in fact a summation of every important lesson that he learned in his highly adventurous and creative life. He helped millions of people and certainly earned more good karma than bad. That said, the one thing notably missing from his impressive collection of “lessons learned,” was the concept of “partnership with the divine and Creator.” There were hints here and there of prayer practice, but it appeared more hit and miss, and certainly did not rise to any kind of prominence in his many decades as a noted spiritual teacher and role model. How could he, and so many other advanced souls like him, have not been able to embrace this most important insight?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
193 views0 answers0 votes
Both Sutphen and his good friend, Richard Bach, author of the 1970s surprise bestseller, Jonathan Livingston Seagull, had their life savings and even copyrights on all their intellectual property stolen from them. The two thefts were not otherwise related. Both were left absolutely destitute. Bach’s manager stole his, and in 2011 some hacker drained Sutphen’s bank accounts, transferred his copyrights, and wiped out all the master copies of his life’s work. It took three years of lawsuits just to get his copyrights back, but everything else was gone. Can Creator share if Empowered Prayer and/or the Lightworker Healing Protocol could have prevented these evil attacks and tragedy that neither man fully recovered from?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
203 views0 answers0 votes
The late Psychiatrist Dr. M. Scott Peck M.D., bestselling author of The Road Less Traveled and who many regard as one of the important pioneers of the “self-help” genre, also wrote an important book titled The People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil from which the questions for this show are derived. Dr. Peck wrote: “… for the past three hundred years there has been a profound separation between religion and science. This divorce – sometimes acrimonious, more often remarkably amicable – has decreed that the problem of evil should remain in the custody of religious thinkers. With few exceptions, scientists have not even sought visitation rights. If for no other reason than the fact that science is supposed to be value-free. The very word ‘evil’ requires an a priori value judgment. Hence it is not even permissible for a strictly value-free science to deal with the subject.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
226 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote: “Science has also steered clear of the problem of evil because of the immensity of the mystery involved. … (Scientists) prefer little mysteries to big ones.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
219 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote: “Evil is in opposition to life. It is that which opposes the life force. It has, in short, to do with killing … Murder is not abstract … Evil is also what kills spirit. There are various essential attributes to life – particularly human life – such as sentience, mobility, growth, autonomy, will. It is possible to kill or attempt to kill one of these attributes without actually destroying the body. Thus we may ‘break’ a horse or even a child. … Evil, then … is that force, residing either inside or outside of human beings, that seeks to kill life or liveliness. And goodness is its opposite.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
227 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck had a teenage patient suffering from depression. His older brother had committed suicide with a 22 rifle a year earlier. For Christmas, his parents gave the patient the rifle his brother killed himself with. When Dr. Peck challenged the parents about the inappropriateness of the gift, the parents refused to acknowledge there was any problem with such a gift, claiming they were just simple, working people who can’t be expected to think like the doctor. They were not willing to examine and find fault with themselves at all. As a result, Dr. Peck diagnosed the boy’s depression as being the fault of the parents and threatened to call social services to get the boy to go live for an extended time with his aunt. He concluded the boy’s depression was actually healthy in this situation, and that the boy needed protection from his parents’ evil more than anything. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
205 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “Raised without love, children come to believe themselves unlovable. We may express this as a general law of child development: ‘Whenever there is a major deficit in parental love, the child will, in all likelihood, respond to that deficit by assuming itself to be the cause of the deficit, thereby developing an unrealistically negative self-image.’ … When a child is grossly confronted by significant evil in its parents, it will most likely misinterpret the situation and believe the evil resides in itself.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
209 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… evil people, refusing to acknowledge their own failures, actually desire to project their evil onto others.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
182 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… the sicker the patients – the more dishonest in their behavior and distorted in their thinking – the less able we are to help them with any degree of success. When they are very distorted and dishonest, it seems impossible.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “The feeling that a healthy person often experiences in a relationship with an evil one is revulsion. … The feeling of revulsion can be extremely useful to a therapist. It can be a diagnostic tool par excellence. … Evil is revolting because it is dangerous. The revulsion countertransference is an instinctive or, if you will, God-given and saving early warning radar system.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
199 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… while evil people are still to be feared, they are also to be pitied. Forever fleeing from the light of self-exposure and the voice of their conscience, they are the most frightened of human beings. They live their lives in sheer terror. They need not be consigned to any hell. They are already in it.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
189 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… very few evil people are willing to be psychotherapy clients in the first place. Except under extraordinary circumstances, they will do everything possible to flee the light-shedding process of therapy. So it has been difficult for psychotherapists to get together with evil people long enough to study them or their reactions.” What this observation really tells us, is that we are literally “out of our league” when it comes to solving the problem of evil. We need “outside” assistance to solve this problem, and that assistance can come only in the form of partnership with the divine. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are truly the only tools in our toolbox we can use to truly fix the problem of evil in humanity, and even the rest of all creation?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
177 views0 answers0 votes
A noted scientist exploring the idea that God is discoverable via science asked, “Can Science Take Us to God?” And not merely theoretically, but experimentally as well? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
221 views0 answers0 votes
This same scientist, in an obvious attempt to discuss God, but somehow remain “scientific,” invented the term “G.O.D.” which he used to suggest a Guiding, Organizing, Designing process. His thinking was clearly that characterizing God in this way would make Creator more “palatable” to the overwhelmingly atheist scientific community. What does Creator think of this descriptive construct? Helpful or harmful? What does Creator think of being labeled “a process?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
221 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…45678Next »
Ask Question