DWQA Questions › Tag: academic gatekeeping
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Dr. Peck wrote: “Evil is in opposition to life. It is that which opposes the life force. It has, in short, to do with killing … Murder is not abstract … Evil is also what kills spirit. There are various essential attributes to life – particularly human life – such as sentience, mobility, growth, autonomy, will. It is possible to kill or attempt to kill one of these attributes without actually destroying the body. Thus we may ‘break’ a horse or even a child. … Evil, then … is that force, residing either inside or outside of human beings, that seeks to kill life or liveliness. And goodness is its opposite.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck had a teenage patient suffering from depression. His older brother had committed suicide with a 22 rifle a year earlier. For Christmas, his parents gave the patient the rifle his brother killed himself with. When Dr. Peck challenged the parents about the inappropriateness of the gift, the parents refused to acknowledge there was any problem with such a gift, claiming they were just simple, working people who can’t be expected to think like the doctor. They were not willing to examine and find fault with themselves at all. As a result, Dr. Peck diagnosed the boy’s depression as being the fault of the parents and threatened to call social services to get the boy to go live for an extended time with his aunt. He concluded the boy’s depression was actually healthy in this situation, and that the boy needed protection from his parents’ evil more than anything. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
198 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “Raised without love, children come to believe themselves unlovable. We may express this as a general law of child development: ‘Whenever there is a major deficit in parental love, the child will, in all likelihood, respond to that deficit by assuming itself to be the cause of the deficit, thereby developing an unrealistically negative self-image.’ … When a child is grossly confronted by significant evil in its parents, it will most likely misinterpret the situation and believe the evil resides in itself.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
199 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… evil people, refusing to acknowledge their own failures, actually desire to project their evil onto others.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
177 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… the sicker the patients – the more dishonest in their behavior and distorted in their thinking – the less able we are to help them with any degree of success. When they are very distorted and dishonest, it seems impossible.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
177 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “The feeling that a healthy person often experiences in a relationship with an evil one is revulsion. … The feeling of revulsion can be extremely useful to a therapist. It can be a diagnostic tool par excellence. … Evil is revolting because it is dangerous. The revulsion countertransference is an instinctive or, if you will, God-given and saving early warning radar system.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
180 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… while evil people are still to be feared, they are also to be pitied. Forever fleeing from the light of self-exposure and the voice of their conscience, they are the most frightened of human beings. They live their lives in sheer terror. They need not be consigned to any hell. They are already in it.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… very few evil people are willing to be psychotherapy clients in the first place. Except under extraordinary circumstances, they will do everything possible to flee the light-shedding process of therapy. So it has been difficult for psychotherapists to get together with evil people long enough to study them or their reactions.” What this observation really tells us, is that we are literally “out of our league” when it comes to solving the problem of evil. We need “outside” assistance to solve this problem, and that assistance can come only in the form of partnership with the divine. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are truly the only tools in our toolbox we can use to truly fix the problem of evil in humanity, and even the rest of all creation?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
174 views0 answers0 votes
A noted scientist exploring the idea that God is discoverable via science asked, “Can Science Take Us to God?” And not merely theoretically, but experimentally as well? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
This same scientist, in an obvious attempt to discuss God, but somehow remain “scientific,” invented the term “G.O.D.” which he used to suggest a Guiding, Organizing, Designing process. His thinking was clearly that characterizing God in this way would make Creator more “palatable” to the overwhelmingly atheist scientific community. What does Creator think of this descriptive construct? Helpful or harmful? What does Creator think of being labeled “a process?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
211 views0 answers0 votes
This same scientist was contacted by Chris Robinson, a man who claimed to get prophetic dreams after a near-death experience ten years earlier. Over the years, evidence obtained through his dreams had helped put many criminals behind bars. Murderers who thought they had escaped were caught. Given this means of uncovering evidence, there truly cannot be such a thing as a “perfect crime.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
207 views0 answers0 votes
The scientist mentioned in the previous questions put together a scientific experiment to test Chris Robinson’s prophetic dreaming ability, which he called “The Ten Days in Arizona Experiment.” Before falling asleep, Chris Robinson would ask the universe, in his head, to be shown in his dreams, where he would be taken the next day. In the morning he would write down the details of his dream. Meanwhile, the scientist preselected ten unusual local locations and placed them in envelopes that were to be shuffled before one was selected as the day’s destination. To make a long story short, Chris Robinson was shockingly correct for all ten locations, including one that was substituted unintentionally because of unanticipated obstacles. What can Creator tell us about Chris Robinson’s ability?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
207 views0 answers0 votes
The above experiment proposes a number of intriguing, and some might regard disquieting questions. We are told the future is not preordained. Yet this experiment seems to propose otherwise. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
186 views0 answers0 votes
Was Chris Robinson’s ability a result of time travel on the part of his deep subconscious and other participants such as his higher self and even Creator, and simply relaying to him in the dream state what was discovered?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
181 views0 answers0 votes
Assuming there are always multiple timelines, was it just coincidence that all ten timelines were successfully dreamed of? What if the experiment was run for 100 days, or 1000? Would he still be 100% accurate? Because the dream was always about the next day, and not the next week or next month, or next year, was the timeline more certain, more “crystalized?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
187 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…45678Next »