DWQA Questions › Tag: academic gatekeeping
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Then there is the problem of placing a collective problem squarely on the shoulders of the individual because societal leaders neglect their duty to provide a solution. Disposable batteries and fluorescent light bulbs are a good example. Both are considered toxic waste and almost everyone knows that they should not be just dumped in landfills but disposed of through careful recycling and recovery of the toxic components. Yet, the responsibility for proper disposal is placed fully on the consumer. Doing the “proper disposal” often means a long drive, wait, and expense to take these items to designated recycling centers which, on top of that, often have limited collection hours available. The result is “good” people who regret tossing their batteries into the ordinary garbage do it anyway because doing it right is simply too expensive in time, effort, and money. And even though ostensibly illegal to do so, there is virtually no enforcement to actually punish anyone for improper disposal. What is Creator’s perspective and advice for concerned individuals wanting to do the right thing?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
104 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Seasilver was a supplement containing the herb pau d’arco, cranberry, and aloe. It got a lot of fanfare back in the late 90s and early 2000s. It was run out of business by the FTC and fined $120 million. They ceased doing business in 2006. Was this an ‘honest’ product being sold for its genuine health benefits? Or a scam? Or was it a good product whose benefits were exaggerated intentionally, with awareness, or unintentionally? Did they legitimately run afoul of the FDA and FTC, or were they targeted by overzealous enforcement, reading ‘too much’ into the laws and regulations governing supplements? Who are the bad guys here and who are the good guys, or were they both breaking and bending the rules of ‘fair play?'” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
28 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Did this constitute an interloper backlash of the manufacturers and sellers of this Seasilver product? Is this an object lesson we should be mindful of?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
21 views0 answers0 votes
You clarified that Vitamin D levels of 40 to 60 ng/mL are important for healthy well-being, but not specifically how important this vitamin is for the recommended Antiviral Regimen to be effective. What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the efficacy of Creator’s antivirals affected by a person’s vitamin D levels? A recent research paper, ‘Vitamin D: A key player in COVID-19 immunity and lessons from the pandemic to combat immune-evasive variants,’ suggests all viral infections are more effectively treated when patients have vitamin D levels between 30-60ng/mL. In 2011, the Endocrine Society urged that: ‘to guarantee sufficiency, we recommend between 40 and 60 ng/mL for both children and adults.'” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
30 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will Creator’s Antiviral Regimen efficacy improve significantly at vitamin D recommended levels of 40 to 60 ng/mL? Should vitamin K2 also be taken to boost absorption of vitamin D?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
The Endocrine Society updated their guidelines for 2024 to advise against routine vitamin D screening and routine supplementation for certain populations, including non-pregnant adults aged 19 to 74. The Society cited lack of definitive clinical data to support the benefits, and this reverses previous guidelines that recommended supplementation among all age groups. Is this a good policy, and if vitamin D supplementation is truly justified, why is there a lack of conclusive scientific evidence?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
63 views0 answers0 votes
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is considered a genetic disorder for those with familial ALS. While the causes of sporadic ALS and ALS/dementia have been unknown, a recent study published in Nature showed that there is a defect in a protein degradation pathway involving ubiquilin2, which normally clears misfolded proteins in all three forms of ALS. Is this the true underlying cause of all ALS or does expression of the disease actually require a viral infection to be present as well?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Why don’t our scientific studies give some credence to belief in your own healing?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
In Dr. Anthony Fauci’s autobiography, he describes a grilling by Senator Rand Paul as the latter’s misunderstanding that gain of function research on viruses is not the same as “gain of function research of concern,” because only the latter includes potentially dangerous manipulations to increase pathogenicity and transmissibility of infectious viruses. Fauci explained what the U.S. funded in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was work on bat viruses that were non-infectious in humans, to simply study their properties. Secondly, he points out that the “molecular makeup of the bat viruses studied at the WIV under the NIAID/EHA grant was genetically so different from SARS-CoV-2 that they could not possibly be the source of SARS-CoV-2.” Is that an accurate description by Fauci and not a minimization or deceptive misstatement of fact?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
Was the condemnation and inflammatory attack on Fauci by Senator Rand Paul orchestrated through mind control manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to provide a false narrative, and was that picked up and reported many times by Fox News commentators without careful review and analysis because of mind control manipulation to create a cover story for appearance of what is actually an extraterrestrial viral creation?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
56 views0 answers0 votes
Fauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 1. “Schools should be fully reopened because COVID was not a serious threat to children and they did not transmit the virus efficiently even if they got infected.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
Fauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 2. “COVID would run its course no matter what actions were taken.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
55 views0 answers0 votes
Fauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 3. “Only the symptomatic should be tested.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
Fauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 4. “It was the vulnerable in nursing homes and other high-risk places who needed protection.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
123…8Next »
Ask Question