DWQA Questions › Tag: academia
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Another detail that emerged was that Sharada was extremely attracted to a young man who she claimed was her husband in that previous life 150 years earlier. While she apparently languished in limbo all that time, he, on the other hand, returned to the light and reincarnated successfully. Somehow, she was able to locate him reborn in a neighboring state and appeared to have made a concerted effort to take over another woman’s body in order to be with him. Interestingly, he showed absolutely no interest in her. Can Creator tell us if all this is true, the karmic consequences for Sharada in trying to steal another woman’s life for “herself,” and also why her earlier husband showed no interest?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
272 views0 answers0 votes
Given Sharada’s aggressive commandeering of Uttara’s body and life, which she ended up reportedly sharing for a number of years, would Creator categorize her as a “hybrid spirit?” One who may have been aligning herself wittingly or unwittingly with the dark spirit interlopers? Were the interlopers indeed coaching and assisting her? Is this also a reason she remained in limbo for so long? Or was she simply a lost soul spirit taking up residence in Uttara’s energy to escape persecution, and Uttara’s meditation and karmic vulnerability created an opportunity for spirit possession the vast majority of the population are spared from?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
256 views0 answers0 votes
When Sharada occupied the body, she could only converse in Bengali. When Uttara occupied, she had no knowledge of Bengali whatsoever. There was very little in the way of mixing of the two personalities, and neither had access to each other’s long-term memories, especially in regards to language. Yet there was some awareness of the other, and some short-term memories that appear to be brain imprints, enabling some limited memory sharing. What does this tell us about the anatomy of consciousness and the role of the brain in enabling consciousness to interface with the body? It seems the seat of language memory is, indeed, not stored in the brain. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
249 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator share with us why this kind of dramatic sharing of a body by two separate souls is so rare—or is it? Could it be that it’s more common than we think, but not recognized for what it truly is, and the signs overlooked or ignored?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
271 views0 answers0 votes
Information on Uttara’s case came from an 18-page summary journal article. Dr. Stevenson wrote two entire books on Xenoglossy cases, where people could speak a language never learned or understood, which one would assume would be the most fascinating cases to study. Yet these books are out of print, and the cheapest used copy is over $70, and there is no Kindle ebook version. Dr. Stevenson’s massive compilation of 1240 cases is out of print and unavailable even in the used market. It is simply flabbergasting that such compelling evidence would have virtually no audience or interest. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
275 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can protect us from spirit intrusions such as the one Uttara experienced? And how both prayer and the LHP can help ignite genuine interest in the evidence of a spiritual reality that is NOT in short supply at all?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
255 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer writes: “I recently finished reading a fascinating and important book, The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena, by Dr. Dean Radin. But as interesting as it was, I found myself struggling mightily to get through it. No matter how much sleep I had, or how well-rested I was, after reading only about ten pages, I would suddenly feel exhausted and sleepy. Nevertheless, I persevered and recently completed the book. I was reminded of a time when a friend over breakfast asked me how GetWisdom was going, and within five minutes of asking, the friend was falling asleep at the table! Is this sudden exhaustion and sleepiness a result of mind control manipulation? How can this be counteracted?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
295 views0 answers0 votes
Is the parenting approach supported by Emmi Pikler, Magda Gerber, and Janet Lansbury, known as Resources for Infant Educarers, or RIE, safe and helpful to employ? Is it more beneficial than “attachment parenting” which some say can become too accommodating, and more authoritarian parenting styles that appear to some, to border on neglect?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
229 views0 answers0 votes
Is the thesis valid described in the book by Karin Gnaoré, The Pikler and Montessori Approach, Sensory Integration, and Psychomotor Therapy: A Comparative Study Based on Research Findings? And while they may be overlapping, are all four of these techniques of value in contributing uniquely to raising well-balanced young?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
235 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona has spent much of his career exploring paranormal phenomena shunned by the vast majority of his colleagues. He is the author of numerous books on paranormal topics and has conducted a number of high-profile experiments with astonishing results. It’s almost a miracle in its own right that he has avoided scandal and has managed to retain his employment as a tenured faculty member. Were his career and the careers of his close compatriots protected and facilitated by the divine realm? Why are there so few like Gary Schwartz as such open-minded academic scholars appear to be even rarer than the mediums he’s studied? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
217 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Schwartz and colleagues conducted a number of experiments with high profile mediums in the late nineties that resulted in both a book, The Afterlife Experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death, and an HBO special entitled “Life Afterlife.” The experiments were conducted in such a way, that no truly objective mind could dismiss the findings as essentially proving beyond a reasonable doubt, that these mediums were legitimately able to see, hear and communicate readily with the dead. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
219 views0 answers0 votes
The HBO special “Life Afterlife” was another story, however. Dr. Schwartz wrote: “HBO had made a beautiful, inspiring show. But the science was sandwiched in the middle and lost nearly all its impact. We had expected that the show would leave the audience feeling ‘Science can be brought to bear on these issues,’ and ‘Wow, those mediums were tested by science and actually were found to be doing what they claimed.’ Instead, the show was good entertainment but little more. We had thought HBO really cared about the science, but discovered what the producers most wanted was to see how many people were crying when the lights went up. After all, HBO didn’t really care about making a scientific statement.” In fact, HBO had given almost as much air time to skeptics, as they did Dr. Schwartz’s experiments. The producers apparently believed they were being “professional and fair” giving equal time to skeptics and therefore creating a “balanced” presentation. But in this case, it seems a “balanced” presentation is simply sinister. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
238 views0 answers0 votes
During the experiments, at one point Dr. Schwartz’s own mother was trying to come through and was overpowering the other dead people who were scheduled to make an appearance. This seemed to convey how little actual “control” the medium had over the channels of communication. It seemed the dead were more successful at establishing and controlling the boundaries of communication than the medium himself. Is this one of the reasons why divine partnership is so critical when one works with non-local consciousness?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
233 views0 answers0 votes
Also, during the experiments, there were a few occasions where one medium or another simply could not communicate with the dead people associated with a particular sitter. They simply got “nothing” the way most people would. Yet, a different medium would have no trouble with that sitter at all. It was summed up as the particular medium simply “wasn’t right” for that particular sitter. Yet that medium would have profound success with other sitters. Can Creator explain why this “all or nothing” anomaly occurred?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
225 views0 answers0 votes
One thing notably absent from the experiments was the entire notion of reincarnation. Nor was there any distinction made, or awareness of different states or conditions the dead might be communicating from. We know that one of three who die end up in limbo. Yet all the dead communicating appeared to be doing so from the same “place.” What was the reality of the dead in that set of experiments? Were all in the light? If so, were rescues performed for some prior to the experiments, and if so, by whom? Did the experiment itself act as a kind of “rescue entreaty” that enabled the divine to step in and “set the table” ahead of time? Or, indeed, were some in the light and some in limbo, even though there was no indication of such status during the experiments? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
234 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123456Next »
Ask Question