DWQA Questions › Tag: 4-15-22Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “We have learned that the Anunnaki lived in the world openly with Humans and were worshiped as gods, for example in the time of Sumeria. Were the Greek and Roman gods, like Zeus, Hercules and Athena, considered mythology in poetry and academia, really Anunnaki or other physical beings? Were these the giants referred to in Genesis, the mighty men of old? If so, it brings a whole new perspective to those old stories.” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers398 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner writes: “I recently did an LHP session for Source Creator. I assume, and maybe naively so, that Source Creator does not need healing in the way that we humans do, however, when looking at the requests in the Protocol, I wondered about the energies involved that could be ‘banked’ for future use by the divine realm, when those energies are not required in the healing for the LHP client and can thus be re-directed for use elsewhere. I suspect, for example, that there may be a lot of negativity directed at ‘God’ which can be transmuted to positive via the Protocol. Not only that, but is not Source Creator connected to every soul in all time domains and as such, would there be a ripple effect of healing for all via the various requests in the Protocol? I imagine the energies involved would be enormous. If this is the case, would including Source Creator as a primary client in every Protocol, hasten the healing of the free will galaxy?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol269 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “I often do Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions for prominent and well-known psychics, channelers, etc., as I come across them, in an effort to provide at least a nudge to connecting with the divine should they be compromised. Can these people, being psychic, notice ‘something’ (hopefully positive) when someone like myself is doing the LHP for them?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol256 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Why does winter get a little bit more difficult for some every year and what causes seasonal blues for some more than the average person? Anthony William says our livers do send feelings about such things, including Seasonal Affective Disorder, to our emotional selves. Is that what’s happening with me? I’ve been working hard to cleanse my liver, but do not know how effective that has been so far.” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Healing Modalities241 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “On March 30 I went into the ER for severe back pain and they did a CT scan and found a small (4mm) kidney stone in my right ureter on its way down to the bladder. That night I experienced the hellish pain kidney stones are known for, for about 2 hrs. I was praying constantly for it to dissolve, and had already requested LHPs from our group to help ease the pain and heal it all ASAP. In the morning I painlessly passed a very small fragment (1mm?) of a stone. The next day I had two or three small incidents of discomfort, but, so far, I’ve felt fine since then. I now add my kidney stone issue to my LHPs and daily prayers. The urologist I spoke to today suspects I may not have passed the stone however, since what came out was so small; that it may have broken into other smaller fragments that are yet to come out. He scheduled me for an X-ray in three weeks to double check, if I don’t pass anything else. Did my prayers and everyone’s LHPs indeed dissolve most of the stone? What were the karmic causes for the kidney stone?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma213 views0 answers0 votesThe practitioner continues: “Will continued prayers and LHPs (as well as more hydration!) prevent any future kidney stones, or is a Deep Subconscious Channeling with Trauma Resolution session for kidney stones needed in addition?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma206 views0 answers0 votesThe assertions Creator is being asked to address in this episode come from the volume, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case Against Life After Death. The author, Matt McCormick, wrote, “The physical structures of the brain are causally responsible for consciousness and its capacities. A neuroscientist examining scans of a stroke victim’s brain can now predict, sometimes with remarkable accuracy (down to the millimeter), exactly what sorts of cognitive, conceptual, emotional, or psychological problems that the patient will experience as a result of his or her brain damage. The connection is too great, too pervasive, too immediate, and too strong to be ignored. The physical foundations of mental functions shows that the alleged separation of mind from brain posited by the dualistic survival hypothesis … will not occur.” What can Creator tell us about this skeptic’s conclusion?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs245 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote this in his contribution to the collection titled Dead as a Doornail: “While most of us would acknowledge some connection between mental function and the brain, we may have failed to see just how deep the connection runs. Even the most abstract mental faculties—and the most specific features and contents of our private mental states—can be mapped directly onto brain functions. … People who suffer from Anton-Babinski syndrome are cortically blind, but they don’t believe they’re blind or consciously blind. They will adamantly insist they can see even in the face of clear evidence of their blindness, dismissing their inability to perform visual tasks by confabulating explanations for their poor performance. … The syndrome results from a specific sort of damage to the occipital lobe of the brain.” Is this wholly a result of brain damage, as the skeptics assert, or is this a clue about the underlying origins and actions of consciousness? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs248 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Capgras syndrome results from lesions in the occipital, temporal, and frontal lobes of the brain. Afflicted patients have the powerful sense that someone they know, particularly a loved one, has been replaced by an imposter. Vilayanur Ramachandran postulates that the problem arises from a failure of the temporal regions responsible for face recognition to communicate with the limbic system regions responsible for emotional responses.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs259 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Cotard’s syndrome, or the delusional belief that you are dead, that you don’t exist, or that you have lost your organs or blood, results from damage to the channels of interaction between the fusiform face area and the limbic system.” What can Creator tell us about this? Are the researchers over-attributing causality to the brain damage alone? Would the same symptoms and delusions inevitably result in any person that suffered similar brain damage?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs219 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Research shows remarkable relationships between brain tumors and brain chemistry, on the one hand, and bizarre thoughts or behaviors, on the other. In one patient the onset of hypersexuality, obsession with pornography, and pedophilia paralleled the growth of a tumor in his right orbitofrontal lobe. When the tumor was removed, his urges lapsed. When the tumor grew back, his pedophilia returned.” What can Creator tell us about this tumor-to-behavior relationship?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs252 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Patients with no history of gambling find themselves overwhelmed with the urge to gamble when their dosages (of Parkinson’s drug pramipexole) cross a particular threshold, sometimes leading them to gamble away their life savings. But when the dosage is reduced, the urge vanishes.” Can Creator tell us what is REALLY going on here?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs235 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Even something as common as the effects of a cup of espresso show that those elements of consciousness alleged to survive biological death depend directly upon the brain.” This seems like missing the forest for the trees. Stimulus effects are conditions that arouse the “decision-maker” within, but they do not decide for her or him! Otherwise, it would be impossible to resist ANYTHING. And life calls for a great deal of discerning resistance! Is it safe to say that DECISION is a spiritual function, not a biological function? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs227 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote, “Even rats are responsive to the pain of others, refusing to eat when their eating inflicts electric shocks on other rats.” He used this to argue that even morality is a product of evolution. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs263 views0 answers0 votesAtheist evolutionists have a tendency to showcase theory as fact. Matt McCormick wrote, “(Experts)… have now converged on the view that evolution favored hyperactive agency detection devices (HADD). The basic idea is there is survival benefit to detecting or attributing agency or intentionality to many things in our environment. ‘It is better to mistake a boulder for a bear, than a bear for a boulder.’ Mistaking too many things as conscious agents is a helpful error since detecting too few of them can be deadly.” McCormick speculates that this is why we are so quick to believe in brainless consciousness. We can’t help it. McCormick writes, “The prevailing view is that seeing manifestations of God’s conscious will, desires, and goals in the world is a byproduct of HADD.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs247 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola