DWQA Questions › Category: Problems in Society
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Political loyalty draws a great deal from both culture and tradition. People like to think they can count on their political parties, and have confidence in the future as a result. But we enter an election season where absolutely no one, either supporters or detractors, can say with certainty whether a year from now Trump will be in the White House or the “Big House,” in prison, in other words. Republicans used to be considered “the war hawks” and the Democrats “the party of love and tolerance.” But it feels like roles have reversed. Nevertheless, people are still desperate to believe and have confidence in their party, no matter what, it seems. But such confidence has become fragile, and doubts and alarm in people growing with the breakdown and erosion of expectations. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
63 views0 answers0 votes
The one thing that is noticeable about the wars going on these days is that none of them have seemingly gone as expected. When a certain outcome is expected, somehow, it comes up short. Violence appears when it’s least expected, and just as mysteriously doesn’t materialize when it IS expected. The use of cell phones and pagers as bombs was something almost no one anticipated. People dread the thought of a nuclear exchange, but maybe they should be more worried about the phone in their pocket. Are these wars being conducted in such a way as to maximize everyone’s CONFUSION and paranoia? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
Google provides this as a definition of gaslighting: “Gaslighting is a type of psychological abuse that involves manipulating someone into questioning their own reality, memories, or sanity. The goal of gaslighting is to gain power and control over the victim, and it can be very effective.” Gaslighting is often done over a long period of time, so the victim may not realize they are being manipulated. Gaslighters may lie about everything, not just big things that could be covered up. Gaslighters may deny things that happened or promises they made. Gaslighters may question the victim’s memory of events, even if the victim remembers them accurately. It seems as if there is a unified strategy on the part of the interlopers, the Extraterrestrial Alliance. Is that what’s REALLY going on, the absolute historic GASLIGHTING of humanity? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
62 views0 answers0 votes
Predicting the future has always been VERY problematic, especially in an environment of rapid flux and even chaos. Is it “controlled” chaos? We know the interlopers are time travelers, and if their agenda was truly the gaslighting of humanity, then the ability to predict the future is what is, in fact, in the “crosshairs.” It’s the very attack vector the interlopers go to pains to maximize. Could this be a possible explanation as to why even divine predictions of the near future have been so uncharacteristically inaccurate? If the interlopers are, in fact, making a Herculean effort to create the most unpredictable reality for humanity imaginable, then abrupt change of plans would not be the exception but the RULE. Creator has attributed this to the “fickleness” of the interlopers, but fickleness seems pretty benign in contrast to an intentional campaign to be as unpredictable as possible. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
72 views0 answers0 votes
In an era where people cannot seemingly have faith in anything, it is all the more imperative to have faith in the divine. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the genuine means to connect with TRUE reality and have protection and clarity while the gaslighting of humanity grows to its inevitable finale?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
73 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “How do we keep children, who don’t like to be physically active, interested in things outside since many children today are not involved in farming, fishing, chopping wood for use in a fire, etc? Children who do like to be active, have tons of sports…and other activities to keep them going 24/7, such as amusement parks or activity centers with cycling, climbing, swimming, the list goes on. What about all the children who don’t like any of this? The ones who probably would have loved to be more practical with hands-on tasks, getting mucky and dirty, splashing about for no other reason than to be doing it? How do we find things for them to do in today’s world?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
175 views0 answers0 votes
Finding your soulmate, your better half, the partner of your dreams, has never been easy. But lately, it seems to have become exponentially harder than ever before. It is believed that fully half of single men have given up on dating and courting women altogether. There is even a mass movement of men known as MGTOW (mig-tao) or “Men Going Their Own Way.” Critics call this movement “male supremacy,” and hateful of women, but members would dispute that and counter that modern relationships with women are downright dangerous for men—dangerous enough to warrant complete withdrawal and avoidance of any and all non-professional involvement with women. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
172 views0 answers0 votes
Something as simple as holding a door open for a woman has suddenly become an uncertain endeavor that could just as easily elicit condemnation and accusations of bigotry and misogyny as it does a smile and warm “thank you.” As a result, many, if not by now most, men have given up on the practice altogether, leaving a great many more traditional women confused and even angry. So it’s become almost a catch-22 situation. Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
164 views0 answers0 votes
The advent of the Internet, and the more recent widespread adoption of smartphones, has really changed the dating scene, and most men and women would agree it’s not for the better. A recent experiment had a male set up an attractive female profile, and it generated 20,000 matches in a just a few hours. A similar reverse experiment set up by a female thinking she could prove there was a level playing field, generated only a few dozen matches to the male profile she created, in the span of an entire month, and none of those turned into an actual date. The female experimenter reported feeling completely dejected by the (for her) shocking outcome of the experiment. Women are overwhelmed with attention, and men largely report feeling almost completely invisible. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
150 views0 answers0 votes
In New York City, it has been observed that dating apps have enabled many women to establish different kinds of categories for men interested in them. A study reported in the New York Post revealed that 33% of women confessed to going on dates just to get “free food.” They even have a term for it, namely, a “foodie call.” Some women have a full address book of men they can call not only for free food but free home repairs, car repairs, shopping trips, travel, you name it. The women have zero intention of ever getting romantically involved with any of these men. All of these men are in the dreaded “friend zone.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
150 views0 answers0 votes
Sixty percent of college graduates today are women. Women are increasingly filling managerial roles and displacing men in numerous professional occupations such as law and medicine. Men, by and large, have no issues “dating down” and entering relationships with women who earn much less than they do, and who are even unemployed altogether. Whereas, the opposite is almost never true for successful women. Overwhelmingly, they hold out and say yes only to men who make as much or preferably more than they do, who are taller than they are (or at least not shorter), and more “successful and worldly,” however they might personally define that. The result is that more and more women are chasing fewer and fewer “qualified” men. They are literally pricing themselves out of the dating market. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
The dating scene is especially problematic, and even deeply traumatic, for single mothers of all ages. With the divorce rate above 50%, along with the huge number of births happening out of wedlock, it’s reaching the point where more children are being raised by single mothers than are being raised by married cohabiting biological parents. Overwhelmingly, most single men, and more often than that, the more desirable single men, want nothing to do with a single mother. Men, by and large, would rather not raise another man’s children and need to be really incentivized to do so. This is a problem that just seems to keep getting worse, not better. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
160 views0 answers0 votes
We’ve already probed the problem of dating for successful women, but it’s especially difficult for older successful women (and older women in general). This is so because the majority of successful and compatible men their own age are either already in successful relationships or choose to date much younger (and therefore more attractive) women, sometimes decades younger. As a result, many of these older single women are desperately lonely and find themselves making do as best they can with women friends and even pets. The stereotype of the single cat lady is on point. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
155 views0 answers0 votes
And if things weren’t bad enough, there is the problem of the “alpha male” most women find attractive—tall, dark and handsome, confident and wealthy. Except it seems a great many women misconstrue genuine narcissism for confidence. The result is that the “qualified guy” many modern women are chasing, holding out for, and compromising themselves for, turns out to be an abusive “bad boy” who ultimately treats them inconsiderately, cheats on them with other women, and even abuses them. From his perspective, he has almost endless numbers of attractive women literally lining up and competing for him, so he has little incentive to treat any of them as special. This composite character even has a name, specifically, “Chad Chaddington.” Chad might literally date more than one woman in the same evening, sleep with most on the first date, and never consider committing to anyone. As a result, he leaves in his wake scores of “alpha widows” who can never get over being spurned by Chad and who therefore have a hard time finding any other “beta” men attractive. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
160 views0 answers0 votes
Finally, in their desperation, women turn mostly to each other for support. There are the curious phenomena of female dating coaches and Internet influencers who themselves have been unsuccessful having romantic relationships with men. What results is a kind of echo chamber where women share their pain with each other, and it often convinces them that men are simply rotten, and to double down and not lower their standards. So they often end up even more choosy, rather than less, making their odds of ever finding a successful partner even more remote. Meanwhile, most men, and many good ones, remain utterly invisible to them. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
179 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…8Next »