DWQA Questions › Category: Non-Local ConsciousnessFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesMany performance artists have commented on just how important applause from an audience is. And many have said that applause is why they do what they do and that many would do it for free (and many do at the community level) just for the applause alone. Can Creator tell us about the energy dynamics of applause, and why it is so effective and even intoxicating?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness219 views0 answers0 votesOne of the more signature components of any mass protest is the slogan chant. “What do we want? Equality! When do we want it? NOW!” is an example of such a chant. Many observers think such displays are a waste of time and have very little genuine utility when it comes to creating change. Yet, it seems to arise spontaneously whenever people want something collectively. So there is a collective belief in its utility and even effectiveness in creating desired change. There was even a recent report of a march in New York City where a group was chanting the above chant but substituting the words “dead cops” for “equality.” What can Creator tell us about the true power behind protest slogan chants?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness214 views0 answers0 votesSlogans, chants, and cheers are just such a natural part of collective human expression that few people really stop to ask, “Why are we doing this?” Can Creator answer that for us? Why do we just “naturally” do this sometimes inexplicable behavior?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness235 views0 answers0 votesCollective singing is another manifestation of collective expression. One of the most intoxicating moments of popular concerts is when the performing artists invite the audience to sing along with them. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness209 views0 answers0 votesIs prayer simply the addition of a “target” to which a collective expression is focused? Creator has said the world could change tomorrow if enough people asked for it. How can we marry this collective inclination to express ourselves, with the needed entreaty to the divine? What would be the most effective prayer, slogan, chant, or anthem in ten words or less that would, indeed, “save humanity” if we could get people to say it with intention and entreaty to the divine? Something along the lines of, “God, please heal everyone in the galaxy.” Something that could potentially go viral and REALLY make a difference? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness318 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help bring about a more collective turning back to the divine?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness391 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Can creator please comment if the pineal gland is associated with or essential for communication with our higher self, Creator, and each other (telepathically)? Does the pineal gland act as an antenna or portal of sorts?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness272 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “What physical action can we take to strengthen our pineal gland?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness317 views0 answers0 votesAnyone who takes more than a passing interest in multicultural spiritual topics will inevitably encounter the writings of Carlos Castaneda. Wikipedia has this to say about Dr. Castaneda: His … “books were ethnographic accounts describing his apprenticeship with a traditional ‘Man of Knowledge’ identified as Don Juan Matus, allegedly a Yaqui Indian from Northern Mexico. The veracity of these books was doubted from their original publication, and they are now widely considered to be fictional.” Yet for anyone who takes serious time to study his works, it seems almost impossible to draw that same conclusion. What is Creator’s perspective on Castaneda and his life’s work?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness258 views0 answers0 votesIt seems incredible, to live our western secular lives, and be almost completely ignorant of the extraordinary spiritual heritage possessed by American indigenous peoples. Castaneda’s mentor, Don Juan Matus, is a most mysterious figure indeed. From the time of the Spaniard Cortez, indigenous shamanistic traditions have been brutally suppressed and pushed into the background. Castaneda writes of Don Juan in The Eagle’s Gift: “He told me that if I wanted to fly, I had to summon the intent of flying. He showed me then how he himself could summon it, and jumped in the air and soared in a circle, like a huge kite. Or he would make things appear in his hand. He said he knew the intent of many things and could call those things by intending them.” All this sounds extraordinary, but we know Jesus could do these things. The Hindus have a word “siddi” to describe these capabilities that we regard as “miraculous.” The message was that these abilities were obtainable by anyone with access to a knowledgeable mentor, and who was willing to dedicate themselves fully to the pursuit. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness261 views0 answers0 votesIt seemed the key and focus of learning to perform miracles in the waking state was to learn to first do these things in the dream state. Without mastery of the dream world, there could not be mastery of the physical world. Nearly all of Castaneda’s training was focused on gaining mastery of the dream world, or the “second attention” as Don Juan called it. It is assumed that the second attention is a synonym for our intuitive faculties. Our waking state is the first attention. Mastery of the second attention or intuitive faculties was the principal pursuit of the shaman and the source of his knowledge and ability to be used in service to his people. The sorcerer, on the other hand, is one who works to attain the same mastery, but only to serve the self and the pursuit of power and control over others. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness226 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: “The power that governs the destiny of all living beings is called the Eagle … The Eagle is devouring the awareness of all the creatures that, alive on Earth a moment before and now dead, have floated to the Eagle’s beak, like a ceaseless swarm of fireflies, to meet their owner, their reason for having had life … for awareness is the Eagle’s food.” This seems like an incomplete description of the Creator of All That Is. Accurate to a point, but missing the quality of love, and the desire on the part of Creator for partnership with his creations. This is further reflected in this passage: “The Eagle, that power that governs the destinies of all living things, reflects equally at once all those living things. There is no way, therefore, for man to pray to the Eagle, to ask favors, to hope for grace. The human part of the Eagle is too insignificant to move the whole.” As powerful as he was, was Don Juan missing the forest for the trees? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness240 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: Don Juan “said that there is nothing more dangerous than the evil fixation of the second attention (or evil mastery of the intuitive faculties). When warriors (or seekers/seers or shaman/sorcerers) learn to focus on the weak side of the second attention nothing can stand in their way. They become hunters of men, ghouls. Even if they are no longer alive, they can reach for their prey through time as if they were present here and now.” How big is the problem of dead evil sorcerers? Are these some of the human hybrid spirits that seem to have partnered with the fallen angelics? If they were particularly adept sorcerers when alive, might their powers even exceed that of some of the fallen angelics, similar in the way that Anunnaki spirits manage to control and repurpose the fallen angelics for evil aims?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness257 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: “… all archaeological ruins in Mexico, especially the pyramids, were harmful to modern man. He (Don Juan) depicted the pyramids as foreign expressions of thought and action. He said that every item, every design in them, was a calculated effort to record aspects of attention that were totally alien to us. For Don Juan, it was not only ruins of past cultures that held a dangerous element in them, anything which was the object of an obsessive concern had a harmful potential.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness296 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: “Your compulsion to possess and hold on to things is not unique, he (Don Juan) said. ‘Everyone who wants to follow the warrior’s path, the sorcerer’s way, has to rid himself of this fixation.’ My benefactor told me that there was a time when warriors did have material objects on which they placed their obsession. And that gave rise to the question of whose object would be more powerful, or the most powerful of them all. Remnants of those objects still remain in the world, the leftovers of that race for power.” For a tourist to pick up such an object found in ancient ruins and take it home, can be dangerous in the extreme. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness238 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola