DWQA Questions › Category: Limiting BeliefsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesSuperstitions may seem silly and innocuous at first glance, but some people worry about them a great deal. Some to the point of having genuine panic attacks if they discover they violated one. How does someone get in this state? Does subconscious mind control contribute? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs269 views0 answers0 votesEastern Europeans, it seems, have a much longer list of superstitions that concern them than those of the West. Does the fact these countries have been war-torn and decidedly less free have anything to do with this? A woman who came here from Ukraine twenty years ago, won’t use leftovers “because it’s pig food” even though she no longer has a pig, so leftovers end up in the garbage. She worries about knives left out because they foment discord when unsheathed. And anything used she purchases she leaves outside for “cleansing,” regardless of whether rain is in the forecast or not. As a result, more garbage is created when it inevitably rains. Yet there is simply no talking her out of any of these worries or practices. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs233 views0 answers0 votesA great many superstitions seem to revolve around an obsession with evil, and warding it off, especially. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol will do more to protect you and your loved ones than slavish adherence to timeworn superstitions, even and especially if there is something to them?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs300 views0 answers0 votesCollin’s online Dictionary defines normal as: “Something that is usual and ordinary, and is what people expect.” Yourdictionary.com defines it as: “Conforming to an accepted, usual, or typical form, model, or pattern.” Most people at some point in their life strive to be normal, and of course, some strive not to be. Many who strive not to be, do so because they earlier failed in their attempts to be and appear normal. For some, being normal is relatively easy, for others it’s a struggle, and for a few, impossible. For some, appearing normal is a major accomplishment, and for others, a necessary nuisance. People are habitual creatures. Norms should reflect successful behavior patterns that stand the test of time. But when “accepted norms” change rapidly, that should be a clue that something is wrong. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs190 views0 answers0 votesA woman reports a conversation with her ex-husband, a successful public personality and a household name in his country. She was trying to convince him that the mainstream media often told lies and created fictional narratives designed to manipulate people into acting and believing things they would not do or believe ordinarily. His response was “if we can’t trust the mainstream media, who can we trust?” Being a highly successful and duly rewarded public figure, he had a lot to lose if he challenged the narrative. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs171 views0 answers0 votesOne aspect of being normal is believing in the common good, that the two are somehow synonymous in many if not most people’s minds. If one simply strives to be normal, one will automatically and simultaneously be considered to be a good person. And to challenge a person’s normality is to simultaneously challenge their goodness. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs176 views0 answers0 votesWhat does Creator think of the idea of root beliefs representing beliefs that create the very foundations of a person’s personal worldview? Such a root belief would be “normal is good.” And from this one belief, an entire superstructure of beliefs about proper behavior, proper ideas, proper appearance, and, most problematic of all, proper politics is manifested. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs201 views0 answers0 votesA root belief is a belief that will be protected at all costs. Even, and especially, in the face of conflicting evidence to the contrary. For instance, if one held the root belief that “democracy is good,” then anything that challenges their notion of democracy is bad. So if a democratically elected leader bends or breaks the rules, but does so to protect democracy, then the behavior is justified. Even if the actions taken are decisively non-democratic. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs140 views0 answers0 votesPeople who spend nearly every waking hour doing their best to conform to social norms are easily visualized as walking around with a little spinning radar dish on their head—always trying to ascertain what today’s “norm” is and if they are successfully conforming to it. People have been observed having actual panic attacks if they suddenly realize their cover is blown and they somehow appear, or even RISK appearing, not normal. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs176 views0 answers0 votesA woman known to one of the GetWisdom founders believes fanatically that she is a GOOD person, that she values the good, exudes the good, champions the good, and that her goodness detector is functioning normally at all times. Any suggestion to the contrary is defended to her last breath. Therefore, the politics she embraces is also good, and any opposition is universally bad. She is not dumb, but she engages in a kind of black-and-white, all-or-nothing style of thinking that is nearly impossible to challenge. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs163 views0 answers0 votesIf one has a simplistic root belief upon which a substantial portion of their self appraisal and worldview is built and supported, is there any escape from that dilemma other than having that root belief utterly shattered? How does this represent a healing need, and how does the divine realm go about healing this dilemma in the gentlest manner possible?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs159 views0 answers0 votesDoes lack of sophistication in thinking represent a healing dilemma or a maturation dilemma? How much is rational and logical thinking a skill that can be enhanced, or a limitation? When we consider someone as gifted musically as Mozart, for instance, we don’t consider ourselves sick because we can’t do a fraction of what he could do. What is needed to be Mozart doesn’t appear to be healing, but PRACTICE and a build-up of skill that spans multiple lifetimes and even dimensions. Countless Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions done for me will not turn me into Mozart, or will it? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs174 views0 answers0 votesInterloper manipulation of our leaders, government, and media, has wreaked havoc with what people have traditionally considered normal—normal beliefs, behaviors, you name it. Can Creator tell us what normal would look like if the interlopers left, and how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are needed to bring that about?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs223 views0 answers0 votesThe assertions Creator is being asked to address in this episode come from the volume, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case Against Life After Death. The author, Matt McCormick, wrote, “The physical structures of the brain are causally responsible for consciousness and its capacities. A neuroscientist examining scans of a stroke victim’s brain can now predict, sometimes with remarkable accuracy (down to the millimeter), exactly what sorts of cognitive, conceptual, emotional, or psychological problems that the patient will experience as a result of his or her brain damage. The connection is too great, too pervasive, too immediate, and too strong to be ignored. The physical foundations of mental functions shows that the alleged separation of mind from brain posited by the dualistic survival hypothesis … will not occur.” What can Creator tell us about this skeptic’s conclusion?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs245 views0 answers0 votesMatt McCormick wrote this in his contribution to the collection titled Dead as a Doornail: “While most of us would acknowledge some connection between mental function and the brain, we may have failed to see just how deep the connection runs. Even the most abstract mental faculties—and the most specific features and contents of our private mental states—can be mapped directly onto brain functions. … People who suffer from Anton-Babinski syndrome are cortically blind, but they don’t believe they’re blind or consciously blind. They will adamantly insist they can see even in the face of clear evidence of their blindness, dismissing their inability to perform visual tasks by confabulating explanations for their poor performance. … The syndrome results from a specific sort of damage to the occipital lobe of the brain.” Is this wholly a result of brain damage, as the skeptics assert, or is this a clue about the underlying origins and actions of consciousness? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs248 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola