DWQA Questions › Category: Lightworker Healing Protocol
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Are these two additions, for past lives and future lives, respectively, sufficient to keep active healing in motion to forestall effects from feasible new occurrences among past and future lifetimes looping back to current life? In other words, does one extension in both directions stay ahead of future developments adequately, so we don’t need a future extension of the future extensions?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
484 views0 answers0 votes
For the Soul Matrix Healing, do we need to have groupings to delineate the interactions of perpetrators on individuals, family, soul collective, and then also break out effects of archetypes on individuals, family, soul collective, or will this be assumed in the construction of the matrix, to be a framework for all the crosstalk among the participating entities?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
442 views0 answers0 votes
Is it of value to do a Soul Reset for all locations worked on, as we do for all human clients? Will that help Gaia heal more completely from all the harm caused by humans, spirits, and extraterrestrials?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
448 views0 answers0 votes
Can companion animals benefit from having a Soul Reset, and would this be good to add to our Protocol?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
463 views0 answers0 votes
Will fewer hybrid lost soul spirits get rescued by the divine realm with our Protocol than other lost soul spirits because of their conscious choice to collaborate with the spirit meddlers, or can that be overridden to save them?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
445 views0 answers0 votes
If a practitioner is doing a Lightworker Healing Protocol session for a list of clients and wants to be sure they are given a high priority, does the practitioner need to do a session just for them, and not just do a general session to be applied to all of humanity? Will doing the latter delay getting the quickest healing help for the known clients in need?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
544 views0 answers0 votes
If doing a Lightworker Healing Protocol session for a group of known clients while also specifying all of humanity to be included results in a compromise, can the high priority client group be requested to be worked on first, followed by a request to have the rest of humanity worked on in like fashion, in order to ensure their clients get high priority, but still do both groups with a single Protocol session? Will that preserve a potential advantage for clients a practitioner has obligations to, but still put the session work to broader use for the human population?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
535 views0 answers0 votes
Are my new Lightworker Healing Protocol requests worded correctly? Are there any inadequacies or errors we need to know about?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
459 views0 answers0 votes
Does the system in place from your creation allow people to vote for humanity’s future by requesting broad healing as many times as they choose, provided there is a new Protocol session with sincere intention behind it done with each request for healing? Can someone do multiple sessions every day, requesting it be implemented by divine realm in increments to heal all humans and their perpetrators?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
509 views0 answers0 votes
How does the divine realm decide who to work on first, given a general request to heal humanity in increments, or is the divine reach powerful enough to commence work on everyone at once even though they are segmented into increments, tied to a measurement of the initial intention of the request, as done for each segment?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
443 views0 answers0 votes
If healing cannot be commenced for everyone at once, if a practitioner has a desire to prioritize healing for certain segments of society, can that be specified, and will those specifications be acted on by divine realm?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
404 views0 answers0 votes
You counseled that doing a Lightworker Healing Protocol session every day might be too frequent and that spacing it out a bit would allow a breather to absorb the effects of the healing and re-equilibrate. So we settled on every other day as the frequency. Now I’m wondering if that might be a limitation that is not truly necessary. Would it be more ideal to say, rather than do a Protocol session every other day, to do a re-application of the Protocol session at the most frequent interval to achieve the most rapid and efficient progress?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
420 views0 answers0 votes
If we ask in the Lightworker Healing Protocol to “Explore and heal current life and parallel life traumas and limiting beliefs underlying all of the negative karma needing to be repaid or rebalanced…” will this be used as a basis to do subconscious channeling by the spirit team as part of the karma repair, or do we need yet another request to specify that approach? Is there a better process used by the divine realm for Belief Replacement?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
416 views0 answers0 votes
If the broad requests for healing traumas and limiting beliefs are used in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, is the current step requesting subconscious channeling with our Protocol questions redundant and unnecessary?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
375 views0 answers0 votes
When we request Lightworker Healing Protocol work on a large group to be done in increments, at what frequency can those sessions be launched with respect to our timeline awareness? Once an hour? Once a minute? Is the upper limit of frequency determined by the need to avoid multiple Protocol sessions being launched by the divine realm at the same moment, thereby competing for our original intention to support the initial request?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
369 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…4445464748…62Next »