DWQA Questions › Category: Coronavirus COVID-19
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Have the careful scientific studies, which essentially show no effectiveness of facemask use to prevent transmission of respiratory virus infections like influenza and COVID-19, been interfered with to discourage rigorous use and add to fears, or are there methodological problems, like many of the masks in use, such as cloth masks and surgical masks, being poorly effective compared to KN95 grade face masks?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
306 views0 answers0 votes
A long-term COVID-19 clinical trial of ivermectin as a therapeutic was just suspended. The reason given was there were supply chain issues, and because it wasn’t really expected to show promise, they were dropping the study. Some physicians have suspected an ulterior motive, as ivermectin is readily available worldwide as a generic drug and being used all around the world to treat COVID 19. They also pointed out that the study itself seemed designed to fail. It was only using a 3-day treatment with a low dose of ivermectin. In addition, it was including people anytime up to 14 days post-diagnosis, which they argue put the drug at a disadvantage because there would be patients with advanced illness, and ivermectin is in use, successfully, as an early-stage therapy. Is there something suspect here?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
283 views0 answers0 votes
The South African COVID-19 virus variant, labeled “Omicron” by the World Health Organization, reportedly is an “evolutionary leap” as it contains over 30 new mutations of the spike protein, and seems to be highly contagious, although little data are available yet. Is this a natural mutation accompanying the spread of the pandemic, or a new lab-created variant designed to worsen things?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
276 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Omicron mutant more highly contagious, and will the current COVID-19 vaccines protect effectively against it?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
277 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Omicron COVID-19 mutant more hazardous for young people and children, in terms of being more likely to produce symptomatic illness, hospitalizations, and death?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
241 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Source Creator, if I have got this right, you are in general recommending the vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. But you also warn against the nanochip in the vaccines. Could you please explain the logic in this?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
321 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “There is evidence the vaccines have been tested using HEK293 (Human Embryonic Kidney) cells of an innocent living child, a healthy little girl, born alive and outside the womb of her mother. She was then killed for and by the harvest of her organs. She was removed alive from her mother’s womb and killed by the removal of her kidneys. She was alive when all of this happened! She was an infant girl from the Netherlands born way back in 1972. We are divine beings; how can we condone this? She is also a divine being with a sacred soul! How can we take these vaccines knowing this little girl’s kidney cells (just the thought of it makes me feel sick!) were removed while she was still alive for the sake of science? How can we justify taking these vaccines?” Are these statements about what happened accurate? What can we tell him about the divine perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
323 views0 answers0 votes
Will the booster shot as a follow-up to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines be more toxic than the initial vaccination in causing a repeat exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, analogous to what you have warned will be more severe consequences with repeated actual infections with the virus?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
345 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about concerns raised by Dr. Peter McCullough, a top Cardiologist: “The problem with the vaccine is Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE). Animals under study did not have initial adverse responses to coronaviruses, but when later re-exposed to the same or similar viruses, they basically had an autoimmune response and died. We know SARS-CoV-2 is dangerous. So it stands to reason that a vaccine designed to prime the immune system will carry risks. Creator has been careful to say, that OVERALL, people are better off, and the risks to health, and perhaps even long-term health, are LESS with the vaccine, than with facing COVID without any protection. The problem is, people have NO IDEA that the vaccine has such dire risks associated with it. Risks for a “few” granted, but if you are one of the unlucky ones, the risks can be quite severe, up to and including death.” Is Antibody-dependent Enhancement a serious concern in human vaccine recipients?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
311 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “There are 14,000 deaths registered in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The swine flu vaccine was stopped after around 25 deaths. Just to put things in perspective.” Are vaccine-related deaths truly that large? Is the rate of deaths from the vaccine larger, and from a different cause, than infection with COVID-19 itself?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
341 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Some doctors were concerned about blood clots in the capillary system—too small to show up on X-rays. The only way to detect these clots, which I suspect is detecting NOT-normal blood coagulation activity and excessive clotting conditions, is a test called the D-dimer: https://labcorp.com/help/patient-test-info/d-dimer. The doctors concerned about this, believe the long-term health impacts are potentially grave. In fact, they are advising their patients to immediately get on prescription blood thinners to combat this condition. But here is the REALLY concerning piece of information. SIXTY-TWO PERCENT of all vaccine recipients who have taken the D-dimer test, test POSITIVE for excessive clotting conditions. What is Creator’s perspective? Is this anything to truly worry about? What are the implications if any? Or is it a temporary and mostly harmless response for the vast majority of vaccine recipients?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
285 views0 answers0 votes
The vaccines against COVID-19 are now known to be less perfect in preventing infection than at first thought. You told us at the beginning of the pandemic that this virus would be a challenge to vaccine-makers, but wouldn’t discount “human ingenuity.” Has the degree of success achieved been due as well to divine intervention to inspire the scientific approach being used that is at least partially effective in keeping most people symptom-free even if they become infected?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
281 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about a recent scientific article showing experimental evidence that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts. Is that a significant negative consequence that is occurring or will occur with the vaccination program underway against SARS-CoV-2?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
261 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “With many reports of harmful side effects and even deaths following the COVID vaccines, could the actual cause be that the ETs themselves are directly causing these people’s deaths or harmful side effects, in order to falsely implicate the vaccines, to create more division and consternation within the human population, just as they are the ones actually causing autism, but timing it with children’s vaccinations, to falsely implicate vaccinations as the cause of autism?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
413 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What about the reports of sterilization and permanent DNA damage from the COVID-19 vaccines? Is this also disinformation or are the young at risk for reproducing in the future?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
327 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…45678…23Next »