This is certainly a clear-cut example of what can be expected from someone who is evil and acts with evil intent. Hitler was certainly, in every respect, the opposite of a humanitarian, so it is not surprising that he held such inclinations in disdain, judging the humanitarian as not only stupid but being cowardly, as though doing something for others could only happen because of inner weakness and done out of fear. When the standard‑bearer of evil holds power over others as the greatest of attainments, only the expression of power, as evidenced by taking rather than giving, is seen as having value. This illustrates as well, that stupidity can take many forms and, in this case, it is the pot calling the kettle black in the sense that Hitler was evincing stupidity, in being completely unable to see value in humanitarianism, being a loveless and completely selfish psychopath without a conscience. As such, his state of being is another clear-cut example of how stupidity springs from ignorance and is perpetuated by it. The utter inability to care about another makes such feelings and inclinations impossible and will result in a state of ignorance, not only about how such things might be generated from within but will not be experienced by a person devoid of the very makeup needed to have any love-based feelings.
Please login or Register to submit your answer