A practitioner asks: “Pfizer is trying to prevent the public from accessing their vaccine trial data for 75 years. This indicates they are hiding something. Was the vaccine initially going to be harmful and even lethal, but did divine realm transmute the harmfulness, and is that why it turned quite effective for a while? If the vaccine was initially more dangerous before divine intervention, why?”

Your questions are winding up a conspiracy theory about dark intentions that is unjustified. Keep in mind that the desire to make a vaccine in the first place was not coming from the interlopers but from human beings wanting to serve the good of humanity. We are not saying that pharmaceutical companies do not have their problems and their ethical compromises, but we do not see that desiring to make a profit from one's efforts is unethical or a moral lapse. The grey area comes in how large a profit compared to the ability to pay, and so on, but those are issues of the upper echelons in the business end of such organizations and quite separate from the sincere desire of the scientific personnel to truly come up with medical solutions, and they are not involved with the business decisions about how it is deployed and for what kind of cost, and so on. They are also very much wanting their work to turn out to be safe enough to be effective and usable in terms of potential downside representing a liability. In such a complex undertaking, there is much room for error to happen, shortsightedness, even misplaced wishful thinking, and this is why there are many safety testing requirements. In the case of the vaccines in question, there was a relaxation of normal safety practices in order to have a timely solution for use during the pandemic as soon as possible, and so this was done as a calculated risk by government and the regulatory bodies giving a blessing to move forward with clinical trials. But those trials were, indeed, encouraging about at least immediate safety concerns, and that is how things go in the overall process for any kind of medical treatment of this kind—one goes step-by-step and begins to widen the availability to more and more individuals, and so on, based on ongoing safety monitoring. The fact that the company does not want their vaccine trial data accessible to naysayers, endless lawyers wanting to mount lawsuits based on ill-informed non‑scientific perspectives that could be confusing to juries, and so on, is not an unreasonable fear on the part of the company. They are not hiding a smoking gun, so to speak, and getting away with it. This is in keeping with other benefits vaccine makers have enjoyed for quite a long time, that doing something on a mass scale, such as vaccination, carries with it special liability concerns and without the government giving them some liability protections, no company would engage in manufacturing of vaccines whatsoever. So this looks like a comfy special arrangement that is self-serving for the profiteers at the expense of public interest, but there are legitimate reasons to mitigate risk in a carefully calculated way to balance the risk against the potential benefit the vaccine can provide to maintain public health and prevent many, many deaths in this case. One can always argue who is getting the better end of the deal and foresight is never perfect. We have said before that we implanted the idea for the mRNA vaccines within human scientists because we knew this would be needed, and this is why the availability was made possible so quickly, and helped to forestall death on a quite large scale. There is only so much prayer power available to prevent such a catastrophe, so the effectiveness of the vaccines has been instrumental in allowing a much greater divine intervention than would otherwise be possible.