Winston Churchill is credited with the statement, “History is written by victors.” As far as the ET Alliance goes, they are usually the victors in any direct contest, and the control of history would seem to be a top priority. Yet, on Earth anyway, alternative histories have a seemingly persistent way of surfacing and casting doubt on the ordained and orthodox narrative of the past. How much of this “bubbling up” of the true past is the result of divine intervention and inspiration?

We would say almost without exception that pursuit of the truth is divinely inspired, otherwise people will simply not be motivated and will not go to the trouble because the rewards are often meager for those seeking deeper truth, and in fact their efforts will often be met not only with resistance but with criticism and perhaps even ostracism in the end for bringing up inconvenient truths about the workings of the powerful. The greater truth and higher wisdom in Churchill's quote is reflecting the reality that your world is heavily stage-managed to turn out the way it does. Even though you see it as often a kind of chaotic randomness that somehow works out at times and other times leads to disasters like warfare, we can tell you that in most cases, the Extraterrestrial Alliance gets their way to bring about misfortune, inequality, tragedy, and suffering of all kinds. What is hidden in the litany of woes is the many influences the divine will arrange to mitigate the damage, reduce the intensity of suffering at least, if not prevent it from happening, and to keep a lid on things, so to speak, from being even much worse than actually takes place. So you are interested in how historical accounts come to be and whether there is a divine intervention when these are not obscured, but rather survive with an honest accounting that may be a revelation that helps future generations make sense of things, and perhaps avoid errors being repeated, and that this might be an example of divine intervention when it happens. We will tell you this is very much the case. This is the reason there are interested scholars in the first place, to probe into such things. When they hit on the truth of things and end up supporting perspectives that will lead to better understanding and greater insight about human behavior and human conflict, and thereby better inform a new generation of human beings striving to do better, this will all be owing to divine inspiration. This is not to take away from the human achievements involved. You are the boots on the ground, so to speak. You may have a divine impulse to do good but if you choose to not act on that, we are helpless to intercede as we cannot do so unilaterally, we can only use your energy as a springboard to assist in some way with our energies. So the interesting interplay here is that the written accounts of history will vary in their authenticity but this will, in turn, be mirroring the reality that world events are bad or good by turns in proportion to the extent divine intervention is allowable from moment to moment based on the rules of engagement. We are looking to humans to set the agenda, be in the lead and decide what is needed, and reach out to request something of us in order for us to intervene. We will make every attempt to do so but when belief is inadequate, either in the divine or in the self, we may have to stand aside, and when there are mixed motives with people wanting to be self-serving as a major agenda in what they do, divine assistance might be withheld to some degree and perhaps to a large extent. In those cases, the victor might well be the Extraterrestrial Alliance and they will see to the recording of history in a way favorable to their intentions and agenda. So the interesting dilemma for you is developing the needed discernment to know the truth of things when you read an account of what has happened that might well be biased, and being able to discern when divine truth is, in fact, coming through or simply the propaganda of the powers that be, wanting to manipulate you to accept the status quo, for example, or embrace some of their handiwork as a blessing when in fact it might be a quite mixed influence on things, and the world would benefit from a more critical and skeptical analysis of what is being reported. It will rarely be easy to know what is based on historical accounts and secondhand information. There are so many sources of error and competing agendas to contend with, but it is a given that whoever is in direct control of things will have the greatest influence on what is recorded and then recounted during any particular interval.