You told us when someone goes in a room and interacts with another person, they are not looking in their DNA, they are not looking in their akashic record, but most likely, they are going into the thought plane and perceiving the nature of thought the person is exhibiting and has compiled within their thought plane, and they are sensing the level of positivity or negativity. You also recently told us that the energetic signature of a person in their akashic record is detectable by others, and can determine how they are seen and accepted, with the example applied to victims of bullying being seen and attacked more readily by bullies they encounter, so healing this energetic signature can be valuable. How do we reconcile these conflicting views?

The views are not conflicting, they simply reflect the answers given to specific questions that were asked in different times and places, as the thought came to you about the respective phenomena. When we are asked about the energetic signature in the akashic record, and whether that can be healed, and what the consequences might be in the circumstances in which the energetic signature may come into play to influence people around the person who may tune into it—that is what we must answer. We cannot extend that further to other similar situations where there may be something in the person on display that can be triggering others to do their worst. So both phenomena are real, both phenomena exist, and both phenomena are involved in how an individual person comes across to those around them and how they will be treated accordingly. There is a difference in terms of the depth of inspection involved in order to see these respective phenomena. It is easiest to see the mood state of a person and tune into the nature of the thoughts they are creating in their local thought plane. This is often interpreted as sensing their body language and making it a judgment according to these physical cues, but it is more the opposite. It is not that people learn body language and then this tells them what the person is feeling and how they might wish to react, it is more the case that people tune in to the individual thought plane and then see the body language and learn to associate the body language with those moods sensed intuitively. This is automatic and done by everyone, although to somewhat differing degrees of sensitivity, but is the first level of familiarity and evaluation in a social setting. When people are capable of a more in-depth assessment they may go, as well, quite quickly to the akashic record and assess the energetic signature, but that is less automatic and less routine in casual encounters. It comes into play much more so when people are thrust together day after day, for example, in the workplace and certainly as members of a family group, there will be much tuning in to the individual akashic records of the other family members and there will be reactions, accordingly, to what is found. And this will trigger their own personal karmic issues, especially when there are past entanglements with the individuals in question—as the match will be then perfect. And in comparing the potential of one with the dilemmas of another, all kinds of alarm bells may go off on a regular basis as the family members may well be a quite real threat to a person based on past history at least. And this is an invitation to a reoccurrence of a karmic tragedy and is the first step in the reawakening and reemergence of the potentials that will bring forth the behavior, causing a replay of a prior calamity if not in exactly the same way, at least in a parallel way.