A viewer asks: “We know mind control works. We know this is happening on a large and ubiquitous scale. The question is WHY does this work SO WELL? Why is logic so ineffective against artificially introduced, but clearly well-entrenched, belief?”

Logic will not override beliefs. That is the nature of the problem. You are assuming logic prevails and the current events happening have an illogical basis that, in your thinking, ought to prevail and be evident to all seeing the conflicting information, the inadequate support for the ideas, and so forth. This assumes that people can use logic unhindered by prior bias through beliefs already in place to the contrary of what is being considered. While in the past, the individuals involved in the political arena would have soundly rejected the propositions currently before congress to impeach the President of the United States because of the flimsy evidence and uncertain nature as to the intent of his actions. Because new beliefs have been imparted through mind manipulation, this will impede application of logic to cause a change in perspective caused by prior beliefs. They have simply been overridden now with new wiring, so to speak. This is the power of belief—it changes everything. It is the foundation of the mind. It determines where thoughts can go and where they cannot. It is a change in architecture, so where doors existed before, there will be walls up that cannot be penetrated. Where windows were before, one may be invited to look, but there is no window any longer and all one sees is blank wall, so anything beyond the wall will be unavailable to the mind. That is why there is such an absolute quality to the discussion. It is not that people can be won over by a careful reciting of facts and logic applied to build an argument and win the case through reason and logic that is compelling to an unhindered person. The affected individuals, by virtue of the strong beliefs implanted within their minds, simply cannot react to new data, new arguments, because they will not hold water given that the beliefs include the guilt of the president as a foregone conclusion. That being the case, any argument professing innocence, or evidence of innocence, will be rejected summarily as a false notion regardless of its origin. No matter how prestigious or lofty the person making the argument, if it flies in the face of known fact, it must be disregarded and that is the nature of what one is up against with a mind-controlled individual. There is a fortress of beliefs they will be operating under. Logic, reason, and contrary information will be rejected summarily. Another description of this situation would be that of having a mind lock, or a one-track mind. This is what is evident when an individual has a preconceived notion and accepts it as a certainty. You will not be able to talk them out of it no matter what you do. There are people who are given information to persuade them that is not fully embraced but maintained as a kind of provisional perspective. It has not fully sunk in, so to speak. It is not hard-wired as absolute. Such individuals may retreat from their perspective given artificially when there is a sufficient incentive to take the effort to explore alternatives and give them due deliberation. Most times that will not happen because it takes too much effort and people are programmed to be complacent as well, and that works against the process of awakening. But some, when left alone for a time without reinforcement of their programming, will begin to revert to prior thoughts and prior leanings because it is more natural for them based on long-standing prior history. Such individuals are in the middle. They are manipulatable but not to the same extent as having a mind lock installed. This, while one might think is a flaw in the system, actually serves the interlopers because to have people suddenly changing their perspective to an entirely opposite viewpoint of common sense and reason would appear to be a dramatic and bizarre eventuality. When there is a range of perspectives, those with very, very extremes of aberrant thinking that is completely inflexible are simply assumed to be acting as their individual selves, more obstinate, more stubborn, etc., but not raising a red flag that there might be something sinister happening other than they may be holding views others are opposed to. But those who are sympathetic will see them as stalwart champions and people will assume it is just the mix of personalities on display and nothing more sinister. When, in fact, it is entirely sinister that it exists in the first place. Unfortunately, the installation of such an extreme level of belief is permanent. When pressed by sufficient pressure or threat, an individual may deny their belief but it will be a coping mechanism only and not a true change of heart. This is the hallmark of the mind lock on display. So people can be intimidated and pressured to stop appearing in public, making speeches and pronouncements, and being a vocal opponent based on irrational thinking, but will not disbelieve their views and even though they may go into hiding, will still carry the same beliefs within and will simply feel they have just lost the contest unfairly by being outshouted. They will never be won over because they are programmed to believe their own illogical perspectives instilled within them by the interlopers.