DWQA QuestionsCategory: Extraterrestrial InterlopersThrough channeler Barbara Marciniak, a questioner asked the Pleiadians, why it seems given the millions of years of savagery and depravity, karma seems to have favored the Anunnaki, in that nothing in the way of a ten-fold return of the negativity they dished out, seems to have visited them in any way that appears remotely equitable. Apparently, karma does need some kind of opposition in order to work as designed. The Pleiadians said the Anunnaki have not had any kind of “posse” after them for more than 500,000 years. There is no one looking for them. No one ready to bring charges. No one to hold them accountable. Without a powerful enemy, the tools karma uses to bring a tit-for-tat are greatly limited. Is this an accurate description of the karma involving their history?
Nicola Staff asked 4 years ago
This is a surface description of the state of affairs. It is more like a snapshot in seeing even this long a period of time without a major adversary as representing a vacuum in the workings of karma when, in fact, karma never rests. Karma is tracking everything. It is making a record of all that happens, good and bad, and this will have consequences. It is certain. It is guaranteed to happen. The only question is the timing. It is true that in the absence of an adversary there are fewer change agents opposing the Anunnaki who could be used as an instrument of karmic rebalancing to bring back some negativity they have launched into the universe to force a rebalancing and begin a process of instruction to learn more about their mistakes. This is unfortunate and does work against humanity in that respect because there is a lack of caution, having surmounted the problem by simply riding herd on things in the way they can and being so far ahead of other civilizations technologically as to make them untouchable through normal material means. But karma is nonetheless ongoing and one clear demonstration of this is the turmoil within their own world you will be getting to with your subsequent questions here. This is a form of karmic payback, as has been observed in many settings for humans, where becoming mean-spirited and committing acts of evil they get away with in other respects may set them up to have trouble in their own household when their own loved ones turn against them and see them for who they truly are and end up rejecting them in a way that truly is a loss. The divine realm is working steadily as well and this is not as visible. There are many things we attenuate. This is less dramatic than seeing harm come to them but, to the extent they are minimized in their reach and the magnitude of the havoc they create, will not be obvious on the surface to outside observers but may well constitute a divine intervention nonetheless. In the way we do not describe to you everything we do, we do not describe everything we do to other civilizations, except as we are asked directly and there is a high purpose served in the disclosure. There is an advantage in being circumspect, to some degree, about our methods because we must do many things through stealth and subtlety to stay in the background, but yet somehow make a difference and not have our signature boldly present on what happens, because this then is jumping into the lead which will circumvent the free will enterprise underway here. That is the major constraint on karma. In most civilizations, we would be the enforcer of karma much more than anything else because all other beings are more closely allied and visibly and knowingly intertwined with us, so it is a much easier way of living to maintain and enforce an ongoing equilibrium, so there are no major deviations from a basic middle course. That keeps things humming along and everyone has a reasonable level of satisfaction in things and that keeps people happy and content and conflict‑free.