I think I’m starting to understand the issues about going into the past and changing something and how it may not impact the future already created. Is it correct to say that if events have taken place involving me and then I go back in time and do something to cause the death of my younger self, perhaps at a very young age so that nothing in that timeline would seem to have happened from my perspective in pondering the consequences, that would clearly not be the reality? What you’ve been teaching is that by virtue of the fact I reached that child self’s future and then was able to come back, all of the consequences of my earlier days were, therefore, already created. So, in effect, if I were to go back in time and kill myself as an infant, for example, that would seem to leave a hole in that infant’s potential future. But, in actuality, there was a future already in existence from that infant growing up to become myself in that future time when I commenced to travel back and cause harm to my infant self. Am I on the right track here to understand why things will not unravel when changes to events in the past are done through time travel?

This, in fact, is a quite perceptive and accurate insight about the dynamics here. When a life is truncated through a major change of direction or the ending of the life altogether through time travel to go back and alter something in a major way, the fact that path would have already been explored and lived and many consequences created in reality, going back and then making a drastic change will not undo what has already happened but essentially ends any further energy being expended on its re-creation but, in fact, through the change will be redirected so the energies of life will head in the new direction designated and then a whole series of additional things may take place. So, in the case of a death, there are no complications because the prior life events will still continue to exist and their consequences be on file for karma to reckon with. When there is a major change in direction, the drama gets more complex because now it is as though two lives are being lived simultaneously, one already in existence with one set of outcomes and another that is overlapping and generating new experiences, new encounters, new events and consequences that must fit alongside. So this is, in effect, a new kind of life extension generated via time travel and that can be overlapping a current life, a past life, a future life, or a future life extension of any of the above. What will happen as a consequence of the changes creating that new life extension through time travel will be governed by the rules of energy. It will be as though there is simply another influencer inserted into the mix. So even though it may be the self, it will still have consequences and if one is visiting another timeline and interacting with other individuals on that timeline, the influence you have and the consequences of your appearance there, will be real and the energetic influences will persist just as though someone previously on that timeline chose to interact in the same way and do the same things. It is only that an outside being has popped up as an influence that makes this remarkable. In effect, it creates a pause in the future life where one is traveling from while their life continues on the other timeline. In effect, their akashic record will show gaps in that future origination point going forward, and then new energies will be created in the parallel lives visited for whatever purpose is being undertaken to employ time travel. So the individual will not be continuing in two places at once but will be essentially engaged in differing locations and times. To be in two places at once requires another incarnation from the soul itself.