Nicola Staff asked 5 hours ago
Unfortunately, this policy change is moving in the wrong direction. It is one thing to abandon that approach to nutritional deficit, in the absence of being able to measure the presence of a useful dietary constituent, and another, to abandon the possibility of even looking, when such a tool is readily available in being able to measure vitamin D levels in patients to rule out a problem.
Nutritional studies are notoriously difficult and often an inadequate way to tease out a specific problem that can be alleviated by dietary means alone; there are far too many complexities and so much variability when it comes to individual human beings, their habits, makeup, genetics, and karmic history. There are endless confounding variables in the equation, far more than science can measure with existing tools. In addition, the entire health arena is heavily monitored and subverted actively, by the interlopers, to thwart scientific investigations and skew clinical data to steer the medical community away from good ideas by making a promising idea look like a dead end.
We see the problem of vitamin D levels as a significant one, given it is a correctable problem without incurring huge expense or side effects, and so is well worth some testing to see what baseline values might be. Vitamin D is extremely important in many bodily functions, so it is not an insignificant detail. For the nutrition experts to blithely restrict the capability of physicians to explore what is taking place in their patients with regard to an important hormone-like substance, is very telling. This is a manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance, one of countless others they have carried out across human institutions and policymakers to corrupt things and undermine human existence.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
